Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-m9pkr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T10:24:57.938Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Compensation for Disability

The Social and Economic Objectives of Disability Benefits*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2009

Helen Bolderson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Difficulties encountered in the transfer of money to a minority group in society are explored. Should benefits for disabled people seek to mitigate earnings loss, functional incapacity or damage? Should they take the form of contingency benefits, merited payment, or compensatory and reparatory ‘gifts’? What are the reasons for the different approaches adopted in the War Pensions, Industrial Injuries, and Invalidity Benefit schemes?

An historical account of the development of these schemes shows that payments related to attributed characteristics or ‘condition’ avoid the pitfalls of undue stress on status, performance and achievement inherent in alternative, and apparently more integrative, benefits. Payments related to condition accentuate ‘difference’ but if they represent a collective liability for society's vicariously caused diswelfares, they need not be experienced as stigmatizing. It may therefore be possible to conceive of a compensatory / reparatory payment for all disabled people, as of right, independent of insurance status, average life earnings, current wage, and other measured achievements. To avoid ‘physiological and psychological means testing’ the basic payment would be assessed on a disabled person's assumed ‘loss of faculty’ but, in the interest of equity, individual measurements of functional limitation may be necessary for additional cash benefits and services.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 3 , Issue 3 , July 1974 , pp. 193 - 211
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Tony, Lvnes., ‘Disabled Income’, New Society, 3 05 1973, pp. 244–6Google Scholar, and Willmott, Phyllis, ‘Social Security in Disablement’, Appendix, Hunt, P. (ed.), Stigma, London: Chapman, 1966.Google Scholar

2 Harris, A. I., Handicapped and Impaired in Great Britain, Office of Population Censuses and Surveys, Social Survey Division, London: HMSO, 1971Google Scholar, Part I.

3 House of Lords, Hansard, Vol. 344, No. 108, 4 July 1973.

4 Disablement Income Group, Creating a National Disability Income, DIG Occasional Paper No. 12, 1972.

5 Ibid., p. 18.

6 Townsend, Peter, ‘Enabling the Disabled’, Guardian, 2 05 1973.Google Scholar

7 Department of Health and Social Security, War Pensions, Appendix B, London: 03 1970.Google Scholar

8 House of Commons Second Reading, National Insurance (Industrial Injuries) Bill, . Hansard, Vol. 414, col. 277, 10 11 1945.Google Scholar

9 Disablement Income Group, Social Security and Disability: A Study of the Financial Provisions for Disabled People in Seven Western Countries, DIG Charitable Trust, 1971, p. 28.

10 Ibid., p. 33.

11 Department of Health and Social Security, Cash Benefits for the Handicapped: A Selective Stttdy of the Schemes of some European Countries in operation, June 1972 (unpublished), para. 336.

12 SirCrutchley, Charles to Henderson, Arthur, 28 08 1916.Google Scholar Public Records Office (PRO), PIN 15/822.

13 House of Commons, 1915, Hansard, Vol. 68, col. 469.

14 Ibid., col. 468.

15 SirWorthington-Evans, L., Minister of Pensions, in evidence to Select Committee on Pensions, 1919, London: H.M.S.O., Cmd. 247Google Scholar, para. 2078.

16 Cole, M. (ed.), Beatrice Webb's Diaries 1912–1924, London: Longmans, 1952.Google Scholar

17 Beveridge Committee Meeting, 23 July 1942. PRO, CAB 87/78.

18 Home Office, Supplementary Memorandum on Workmen's Compensation, PRO, CAB 87/76.

19 Departmental Committee on Workmen's Compensation, Cmd. 816, London: HMSO, 1920.

20 Home Office, Supplementary Memorandum on Workmen's Compensation, op. cit.

21 Cmd. 816, op. cit., Q.12, 827.

22 Ibid., p. 44.

23 Although one writer considered that ‘in many cases contributions from clubs and other sources … together with the weekly compensation, approximated to, or exceeded the income received whilst at work’ and that ‘there is little: inducement to resume work so long as such benefits can be obtained’. Collie, Sir John, ‘Workmen's Compensation: Its Medical Aspect’, cited in Wilson, Sir A. and Levy, H., Workmen's Compensation, London: OUP, 1941, p. 183.Google Scholar

24 There is ample evidence of these practices in departmental papers; see, for example, PRO, PIN 7/118, also Nuffield College Social Reconstruction Survey, evidence on Workmen's Compensation to Beveridge Committee, PRO, CAB 87/80.

25 Meeting, Beveridge and TUC Representatives, 4 January 1942, PRO, CAB 87/77.

26 In Evidence to Beveridge Committee, 20 May 1942, PRO, CAB 87/77.

27 A scheme of compensation for civilians injured by enemy action, introduced in the Second World War.

28 The number of Special Hardship Allowances in payment at 30 September 1970 was 143,000 compared with 17,000 on 31 December 1949, an eight-fold increase. In the same period the number of Disability Pensions in payment rose from 39,000 to 205,000, a five-fold increase. The relatively slower rise in the number of Disability Pensions is partly accounted for by an increase in the number of gratuities awarded. In 1970, 41 per cent of Allowances in payment had been awarded in conjunction with gratuities, compared with 17 per cent in 1951. The number of Allowances in payment at any one time are also affected by the age and sex composition of the recipients of Industrial Disablement Benefit and by the duration of the Pensions paid. National insurance (Industrial Injuries) Act, 1946. Report by the Government Actuary on First and Second Quinquennial Reviews, 1955 and 1960, H.C. 22 and H.C. 300, London: HMSO. Department of Health and Social Security Annual Report, 1971, Cmd. 5019, London: HMSO, Table 97.

29 Hutson, T., PRO, PIN 8/17.

30 Hansard, vol. 404, col. 1437, 8 November 1944.

31 Epilogue, in Robson, W. (ed.), Social Security, 3rd Edition, London: Allen and Unwin, 1948.Google Scholar

32 Rehabilitation, Report of a Sub-Committee of the Standing Medical Advisory Committee, London: HMSO, 1972Google Scholar, Appendix IX.

33 Social Insurance: Proposals for Earnings-Related Short-Term and Invalidity Benefits, Cmd. 4124, London: HMSO, 1969.

34 Strategy for Pensions: The Future Development of State and Occupational Provision, Cmd. 4755, London: HMSO, 1971, para. 10.

35 For details and conditions of private group disability insurance, see ‘Permanent Health Insurance – 1973’, Policy Holder PH1 Supplement, 1973. For trends in Ill-Health Pensions, see Occupational Pension Schemes, 1971, Fourth Survey by the Government Actuary. London: HMSO, 1972.

36 DIG Occasional Paper No. 12, op. cit., p. 18.

37 Ibid., p. 17

38 e.g. Atiyah, P. S., Accidents, Compensation and the Law, London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1970.Google Scholar

39 Harris A. I., op. cit.

40 Office of Population Censuses and Surveys, The General Household Survey, London: HMSO, 1973, Table 8.2.

41 Ibid., p. 279.

42 Smith, R. T. and Lilienfeld, A. M., The Social Security Disability Programme, US Dept. of Health Education and Welfare, Social Security Administration, Office of Research and Statistics Research Report No. 39, Washington: US Government Printing Office, 1971.Google ScholarStanley, Gertrude L., ‘Work and Earnings of the Disabled’, Social Security Survey of the Disabled 1966, US Dept. of Health, Education and Welfare, Social Security Administration, Office of Research and Statistics Report No. 17, Washington: 1971.Google Scholar Administration of the Wage-Stop, Report by the Supplementary Benefits Commission to the Minister of Social Security, London: HMSO, 1967.

43 Resettlement Policy and Services for Disabled People, Discussion Paper for the National Advisory Council on the Employment of the Disabled, London: Department of Employment, 1972, paras. 152 and 153.

44 Titmuss, R. M., Commitment to Welfare, London: Allen and Unwin, 1963, p. 63.Google Scholar

45 A survey of war pensioners and industrially injured people is being undertaken by Sally Sainsbury (forthcoming publication).

46 Paul Valéry, quoted in DHSS Cash Benefits for the Handicapped, op. cit.