Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

A Basic Income Trilemma: Affordability, Adequacy, and the Advantages of Radically Simplified Welfare

  • LUKE MARTINELLI (a1)

Abstract

As basic income (BI) has ascended the policy agenda, so proposals have come under increasing scrutiny for their affordability and adequacy for meeting need. One common objection to BI has been that it is impossible to design a scheme that simultaneously conforms to these two criteria. In this article, I develop a conceptual framework for analysing the trade-offs that afflict BI policy design. I suggest that while the idea of a policy dilemma between affordability and adequacy does indeed afflict ‘full’ BI schemes, it is possible to design an affordable and adequate ‘partial’ BI scheme. However, this comes at the cost of (at least partly) forfeiting some key advantages that motivate interest in BI in the first place, since these only arise as a consequence of the elimination of means testing and related conditionality from the welfare system. Thus, BI proponents face a three-way trade-off in policy design between affordability, adequacy, and securing the full advantages of BI as a radical simplification of existing welfare policy. The trilemma is illustrated with reference to original microsimulation evidence for the UK, which demonstrates that at most two of the three criteria can be achieved in a single scheme.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Footnotes

Hide All

The results presented here are based on EUROMOD version H1.0+ (ISER, 2017). EUROMOD is maintained, developed and managed by the Institute for Social and Economic Research (ISER) at the University of Essex, in collaboration with national teams from the EU member states. We are indebted to the many people who have contributed to the development of EUROMOD. The process of extending and updating EUROMOD is financially supported by the European Union Programme for Employment and Social Innovation (2014-2020). The results and their interpretation are the author’s responsibility.

Footnotes

References

Hide All
Atkinson, A. (1996), “The case for a participation income.The Political Quarterly, 67(1), 6770.
Birnbaum, S. and De Wispelaere, J. (2016), “Basic Income in the Capitalist Economy: The Mirage of “Exit” from Employment.Basic Income Studies, 11(1): 6174.
Crocker, G. (2015), “Keynes, Piketty, and Basic Income.Basic Income Studies, 10(1): 91113.
Davala, S., Jhabvala, R., Standing, G. and Mehta, S. K. (2015), Basic income: A transformative policy for India. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Department for Work and Pensions (2016) “Family Resources Survey, 2014-2015”, National Centre for Social Research, Office for National Statistics, Social and Vital Statistics Division. UK Data Service, SN: 8013, http://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-8013-1
De Wispelaere, J. and Stirton, L. (2012) “A Disarmingly Simple Idea? Practical Bottlenecks in Implementing a Universal Basic Income”, International Social Security Review, 65(2): 103121.
De Wispelaere, J. and Stirton, L. (2013), “The Politics of Unconditional Basic Income: Bringing Bureaucracy Back In”, Political Studies, 61(4): 915932.
Gaffney, D. and Buck, K. (2018), “The practical response to our society’s widening inequality? A partial basic income.” Left Foot Forward, 3rd September 2018. https://leftfootforward.org/2018/09/the-practical-response-to-our-societys-widening-inequality-a-partial-basic-income/ [accessed 1.10.2018].
Gamel, C., Balsan, D., and Vero, J. (2006), “The impact of basic income on the propensity to work: Theoretical issues and micro-econometric results.The Journal of Socio-Economics, 35(3): 476497.
Goodin, R. (1992), “Towards a Minimally Presumptuous Social Welfare Policy” in Van Parijs, P. (ed.) Arguing for Basic Income: Ethical Foundations for a Radical Reform. London/New York: Verso.
Gough, I. (2016), “Potential benefits and pitfalls of a universal basic income.” The Guardian Letters, 10th June 2016. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jun/10/potential-benefits-and-pitfalls-of-a-universal-basic-income [accessed 02.02.2018].
Goulden, C. (2018), Universal Basic Income – not the answer to poverty. Joseph Rowntree Foundation. https://www.jrf.org.uk/blog/universal-basic-income-not-answer-poverty [accessed 1.10.2018].
Groot, L. and Van Der Veen, R. (2000), “How Attractive is a Basic Income for European Welfare States?” in Van Der Veen, R. and Groot, L. (eds.) Basic Income on the Agenda: Policy Objectives and Political Chances. Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Press.
Hirsch, D. (2015), Could a ‘Citizen’s Income’ Work? Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
Institute of Fiscal Studies (IFS) (2017), Estimating the responsiveness of top incomes to tax: a summary of three new papers. IFS Briefing Note BN214. https://www.ifs.org.uk/uploads/publications/bns/BN214.pdf [accessed 1/10/2018].
Institute for Social and Economic Research (2017), EUROMOD: Version H1.0+, December 2017. University of Essex.
Kay, J. (2017), “The Basics of Basic Income.Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, 52(2): 6974.
Kela (2016), From Idea to Experiment: Report on universal basic income experiment in Finland. Kela Working Paper 106/2016. Helsinki: Kela.
Marinescu, I. (2017), No Strings Attached: The Behavioral Effects of U.S. Unconditional Cash Transfer Programs. New York: Roosevelt Institute.
Martinelli, L. (2017a), The fiscal and distributional implications of alternative universal basic income schemes in the UK. Bath: Institute for Policy Research, University of Bath. https://www.bath.ac.uk/publications/the-fiscal-and-distributional-implications-of-alternative-universal-basic-income-schemes-in-the-uk/ [accessed 1/10/2018].
Martinelli, L. (2017b), Assessing the case for a universal basic income in the UK. Bath: Institute for Policy Research, University of Bath. https://www.bath.ac.uk/publications/assessing-the-case-for-a-universal-basic-income-in-the-uk/ [accessed 1/10/2018].
Martinelli, L. and Pearce, N. (2019), “Basic income in the UK: political impediments and feasible schemes.Social Policy & Society, April 18(2): 265275.
Mian, E. (2016), “Don’t fall for universal basic income – it’s a utopian fiction that wastes public money on the rich.” The Independent, 22nd March 2016. https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/don-t-fall-for-universal-basic-income-it-s-a-utopian-fiction-that-wastes-public-money-on-the-rich-a6945881.html [accessed 1.10.2018].
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2017), Basic income as a policy option: Can it add up? Policy Brief on the Future of Work. Paris: OECD.
Piachaud, D. (2018), “Basic income: confusion, claims and choices.Journal of Poverty and Social Justice, 26(3), 299314.
Reed, H. and Lansley, H. (2016), Universal Basic Income: An idea whose time has come? London: Compass.
Sloman, P. (2018), “Universal Basic Income in British Politics, 1918–2018: From a ‘Vagabond’s Wage’ to a Global Debate.Journal of Social Policy, 47(3), 625642.
Standing, G. (2005), “Why basic income is needed for a right to work.Rutgers Journal of Law & Urban Policy, 2(1): 91102.
Standing, G. (2017), Basic Income: And How We Can Make It Happen. Pelican.
Torry, M. (2016), An evaluation of a strictly revenue neutral Citizen’s Income scheme. Euromod working paper EM 5/16. University of Essex.
Torry, M. (2017), A variety of indicators evaluated for two implementation methods for a Citizen’s Basic Income. Euromod working paper 12/17. University of Essex.
Van Parijs, P. (2004), “Basic Income: a simple and powerful idea for the twenty-first century.Politics and Society, 32(1): 739.
Van Parijs, P. and Vanderborght, Y. (2017), Basic Income: A Radical Proposal for a Free Society and a Sane Economy. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.
Widerquist, K. (2005), “A failure to communicate: what (if anything) can we learn from the negative income tax experiments?The Journal of Socio-Economics, 34(2005): 4981.
Widerquist, K. (2013), Independence, propertylessness, and basic income: A theory of freedom as the power to say no. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Widerquist, K. (2017), “The Cost of Basic Income Back-of-the-Envelope Calculations.Basic Income Studies, 12(2): 113.
Work and Pensions Select Committee (2017), Citizen’s Income. Eleventh Report of Session 2016–17. London: House of Commons. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmworpen/793/793.pdf [accessed 1.10.2018].

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed