Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Recusatio as Political Theatre: Horace's Letter to Augustus*

  • Kirk Freudenburg (a1)

Abstract

Among the most potent devices that Roman emperors had at their disposal to disavow autocratic aims and to put on display the consensus of ruler and ruled was the artful refusal of exceptional powers, or recusatio imperii. The practice had a long history in Rome prior to the reign of Augustus, but it was Augustus especially who, over the course of several decades, perfected the recusatio as a means of performing his hesitancy towards power. The poets of the Augustan period were similarly well practised in the art of refusal, writing dozens of poetic recusationes that purported to refuse offers urged upon them by their patrons, or by the greater expectations of the Augustan age, to take on projects. It is the purpose of this paper to put the one type of refusal alongside the other, in order to show to what extent the refusals of the Augustan poets are informed not just by aesthetic principles that derive, most obviously, from Callimachus, but by the many, high-profile acts of denial that were performed as political art by the emperor himself.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Footnotes

Hide All
*

For their many helpful comments and criticisms I wish to thank the journal's anonymous readers, as well as the two editors of JRS who helped guide me through the process of publication: Greg Woolf gave the paper a fair chance and provided crystal clear and sensible suggestions for its improvement, and Catherine Steel helped me re-think some of the paper's basic assertions on my way to cleaning up and solidifying the final version. The basic ideas of this paper were tested out in lecture form at Yale University, at the International Conference on Poetics in the Greco-Roman World, held at the University of Belgrade in October 2011 (co-sponsored by the Institute of Classical Studies, University College, London), and at the University of São Paulo in March of 2013. Helpful criticisms were provided at each of these venues. Special thanks are owed to Alessandro Barchiesi and Maurizio Bettini for commenting on early versions of the paper, and to Joe Farrell for providing several criticisms of, and expressing an encouraging degree of enthusiasm for, a near-final version. Given the paper's large size, I was not able to incorporate all of the ideas and further considerations that my readers urged me to take on. But I plan on giving this article a second, expanded life as a book chapter, and it is there that I hope to give my readers’ suggestions all the room they need to breathe.

Footnotes

References

Hide All
Ahl, F. 1984: ‘The rider and the horse: politics and power in Roman poetry from Horace to Statius’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der romischen Welt 2.32.1, 40124
Alföldi, A. 1959: ‘Hasta summa imperii: the spear as embodiment of sovereignty in Rome’, American Journal of Archaeology 63, 127
Allen, W. 1956: ‘O Fortunatam Natam …’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 87, 130–46
Ando, C. 2000: Imperial Ideology and Provincial Loyalty in the Roman Empire, Berkeley
Armstrong, D. 1986: ‘Horatius eques et scriba: Satires 1.6 and 2.7’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 116, 255–88
Barchiesi, A. 1993: ‘Insegnare ad Augusto: Orazio, Epistole 2.1 e Ovidio, Tristia II’, Materiali e Discussioni per l'Analisi dei Testi Classici 31, 149–84
Barchiesi, A. 1994: Il poeta e il principe. Ovidio e il discorso augusteo, Rome
Barchiesi, A. 2001: Speaking Volumes: Narrative and Intertext in Ovid and Other Latin Poets, London
Barchiesi, A. 2011: ‘Roman Callimachus’, in Acosta-Hughes, B., Lehnus, L. and Stephens, S. (eds), Brill's Companion to Callimachus, Leiden and Boston, 511–33
Bellinger, A. 1957: ‘The immortality of Alexander and Augustus’, Yale Classical Studies 15, 91100
Béranger, J. 1948: ‘Le refus du pouvoir’, Museum Helveticum 5, 178–96
Béranger, J. 1953: Recherches sur l'aspect idéologique du principat, Basel
Bourdieu, P. 1984: Distinction: a Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste, Cambridge, MA
Bowditch, P. 2001: Horace and the Gift Economy of Patronage, Berkeley
Brink, C. O. 1982: Horace on Poetry: Epistles Book II, Cambridge
Cameron, A. 1995: Callimachus and his Critics, Princeton
Charlesworth, M. P. 1939: ‘The refusal of divine honours, an Augustan formula’, Papers of the British School at Rome 15, 110
Cooley, A. 2009: Res Gestae Divi Augusti: Text, Translation, and Commentary, Cambridge
Courtney, E. 1993: The Fragmentary Latin Poets, Oxford
Crawford, M., and Coarelli, F. 1977: ‘Public building in Rome between the Second Punic War and Sulla’, Papers of the British School at Rome 45, 123
D'Arms, J. 1981: Commerce and Social Standing in Ancient Rome, Cambridge, MA
Eder, W. 2005: ‘Augustus and the power of tradition’, in Galinsky, K. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Augustus, Cambridge, 1332
Farrell, J. 2002: ‘Greek lives and Roman careers in the classical vita tradition’, in Cheney, P. and de Armas, F. A. (eds), European Literary Careers: the Author from Antiquity to the Renaissance, Toronto, 2446
Feeney, D. C. 1998: Literature and Religion at Rome, Cambridge
Feeney, D. C. 2009: ‘Una cum scriptore meo: poetry, Principate and the traditions of literary history in the epistle to Augustus’, in Freudenburg, K. (ed.), Oxford Readings in Classical Studies, Horace: Satires and Epistles, Oxford, 360–85; reprinted with revisions and corrections from D. C. Feeney in A. J. Woodman and D. C. Feeney (eds), Traditions and Contexts in the Poetry of Horace (Cambridge, 2002), 172–87
Fiske, G. C. 1920: Lucilius and Horace: A Study in the Classical Theory of Imitation, University of Wisconsin Studies in Language and Literature 7, Madison
Flaig, E. 2010: ‘The transition from Republic to Principate: loss of legitimacy, revolution, and acceptance’, in Arnason, J. and Raaflaub, K. (eds), The Roman Empire in Context: Historical and Comparative Perspectives, London, 6784
Flower, M. 1988: ‘Agesilaus of Sparta and the origins of the ruler cult’, Classical Quarterly 38, 123–34
Fowler, D. 1995: ‘Horace and the aesthetics of politics’, in Harrison, S. J. (ed.), Homage to Horace: a Bimillenary Celebration, Oxford, 248–66
Fowler, D. 2008: ‘Lectures on Horace's Epistles’, The Cambridge Classical Journal 54, 80113
Fraenkel, E. 1957: Horace, Oxford
Freudenburg, K. 1993: The Walking Muse: Horace on the Theory of Satire, Princeton
Freudenburg, K. 2006: ‘Playing at lyric's boundaries: dreaming forward in Book Two of Horace's Sermones’, Dictynna 3, 135–72
Freudenburg, K. 2010: ‘Horatius anceps: persona and self-revelation in satire and song’, in Davis, G. (ed.), A Companion to Horace, London, 271–90
Fullerton, M. 1985: ‘The Domus Augusti in imperial iconography of 13–12 BC’, American Journal of Archaeology 89.3, 473–83
Galinsky, K. 1996: Augustan Culture, Princeton
Goldberg, S. 2005: Constructing Literature in the Roman Republic, Cambridge
Gowers, E. 2012: Horace: Satires Book I, Cambridge
Gradel, I. 2002: Emperor Worship and Roman Religion, Oxford
Green, S. J. 2004: Ovid, Fasti I: a Commentary, Leiden
Griffin, J. 1984: ‘Augustus and the poets: “Caesar qui cogere posset”’, in Millar, F. and Segal, E. (eds), Caesar Augustus: Seven Perspectives, Oxford, 189218
Gruen, E. 2005: ‘Augustus and the making of the Principate’, in Galinsky, K. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Augustus, Cambridge, 3351
Habicht, C. 1973: ‘Die augusteische Zeit und das erste Jahrhundert nach Christi Geburt’, in Boer, W. den (ed.), Le Culte des souverains dans l'empire romaine, Vandoevres, Geneva, 4188
Habicht, C. 2006: The Hellenistic Monarchies, Ann Arbor
Habinek, T. 1990: ‘The politics of candor in Cicero's de Amicitia’, Apeiron 23.4, 165–85
Habinek, T. 1998: The Politics of Latin Literature: Writing, Identity, and Empire in Ancient Rome, Princeton
Harbach, A. 2010: Die Wahl des Lebens in der antiken Literatur, Heidelberg
Harrill, J. A. 2011: ‘Paul and empire: studying Roman identity after the cultural turn’, Early Christianity 2, 281311
Haß, K. 2007: Lucilius und der Beginn der Persönlichkeitsdichtung in Rom, Stuttgart
Hooley, D. 1998: The Knotted Thong: Structures of Mimesis in Persius, Ann Arbor
Hunter, R. 2006: The Shadow of Callimachus, Cambridge
Huttner, U. 2004: Recusatio imperii. Ein politisches Ritual zwischen Ethik und Taktik, Hildesheim
Kaster, R. 2005: Emotion, Restraint, and Community in Ancient Rome, Oxford
Kindstrand, J. 1976: Bion of Borysthenes: a Collection of the Fragments with Introduction and Commentary, Uppsala
Klingner, F. 2009: ‘Horace's letter to Augustus’, in Freudenburg, K. (ed.), Oxford Readings in Horace: Satires and Epistles, Oxford, 335–59 = trans. K. Freudenburg of F. Klingner, ‘Horazens Brief an Augustus’, Sitzungsberichte der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Berlin 5 (1950), 1–32
Koenen, L. 1993: ‘The Ptolemaic king as a religious figure’, in Bulloch, A., Gruen, E. S., Long, A. A. and Steward, A. (eds), Images and Ideologies: Self-definition in the Hellenistic World, Berkeley, 25115
Labate, M. 1996: ‘Il sermo oraziano e i generi letterari’, in Krasser, H. and Schmidt, E. A. (eds), Zeitgenosse Horaz: der Dichter und seine Leser seit zwei Jahrtausenden, Tübingen, 424–41
Langlands, R. 2006: Sexual Morality in Ancient Rome, Cambridge
Lejay, P. 1911: Oeuvres d'Horace, Satires, Paris
Lowrie, M. 2002a: ‘Beyond performance envy: Horace and the modern in the Epistle to Augustus’, in Paschalis, M. (ed.), Horace and Greek Lyric Poetry, Rethymnon Classical Studies 1, 141–71
Lowrie, M. 2002b: ‘Horace, Cicero and Augustus, or the poet statesman at Epistles 2.1.256’, in Woodman, A. J. and Feeney, D. C. (eds), Traditions and Contexts in the Poetry of Horace, Cambridge, 158–71
Lyne, R. O. A. M. 1995: Horace: Behind the Public Poetry, New Haven
Ma, J. 2008: ‘Kings’, in Erskine, A. (ed.), A Companion to the Hellenistic World, Oxford, 177–95
Marks, R. 2005: From Republic to Empire: Scipio Africanus in the Punica of Silius Italicus, Frankfurt
Matthews, J. 2010: Roman Perspectives, Swansea
Millar, F. 1964: A Study of Cassius Dio, Oxford
Moles, J. 2007: ‘Philosophy and ethics’, in Harrison, S. J. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Horace, Cambridge, 165–80
Mueller, H. 2002a: Roman Religion in Valerius Maximus, London and New York
Mueller, H. 2002b: ‘The extinction of the Potitii and the sacred history of Augustan Rome’, in Levene, D. S. and Nelis, D. P. (eds), Clio and the Poets: Augustan Poetry and the Traditions of Ancient Historiography, Leiden, 313–29
Nauta, R. 2006: ‘The Recusatio in Flavian poetry’, in Nauta, R., van Dam, H.-J. and Smolenaars, J. (eds), Flavian Poetry, Leiden, 2140
Nisbet, R., and Rudd, N. 2004: A Commentary on Horace: Odes Book III, Oxford
Oliensis, E. 1998: Horace and the Rhetoric of Authority, Cambridge
Oost, S. 1958: ‘The career of M. Antonius Pallas’, American Journal of Philology 79, 113–39
Osgood, J. 2011: Claudius Caesar: Image and Power in the Early Roman Empire, Cambridge
Peirano, I. 2012: The Rhetoric of the Roman Fake: Latin Pseudepigrapha in Context, Cambridge
Pelling, C. 2009: ‘The first biographers: Plutarch and Suetonius’, in Griffin, M. (ed.), A Companion to Julius Caesar, London, 252–66
Pollitt, J. 1978: ‘The impact of Greek art on Rome’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 108, 155–74
Price, S. R. F. 1984: Rituals and Power: the Roman Imperial Cult in Asia Minor, Cambridge
Putnam, M. 1986: Artifices of Eternity: Horace's Fourth Book of Odes, Ithaca
Reinhold, M. 1933: Marcus Agrippa: a Biography, Geneva
Ridley, R. 2003: The Emperor's Retrospect. Augustus’ Res Gestae in Epigraphy, Historiography and Commentary, Leuven and Dudley, Mass.
Roller, M. 2001: Constructing Autocracy: Aristocrats and Emperors in Julio-Claudian Rome, Princeton
Rudd, N. 1989: Horace Epistles Book II and Epistle to the Pisones (‘Ars Poetica’), Cambridge
Seo, J. M. 2009: ‘Statius Silvae 4.9 and the poetics of saturnalian exchange’, Materiali e Discussioni per l'Analisi dei Testi Classici 61, 243–56
Severy, B. 2003: Augustus and the Family at the Birth of the Roman Empire, New York and London
Skutsch, O. 1968: Studia Enniana, London
Skutsch, O. 1985: The Annals of Q. Ennius, Oxford
Sullivan, J. P. 1976: Propertius: a Critical Introduction, Cambridge
Syme, R. 1989: ‘Janus and Parthia in Horace’, in Diggle, J., Hall, J. B., and Jocelyn, H. D. (eds), Studies in Latin Literature and its Tradition in Honour of C. O. Brink, Cambridge Philological Society, Supplementary Volume 15, 113–24
Tatum, J. 2000: ‘Aspirations and divagations: the poetics of place in Propertius 2.10’, Transations and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 130, 394410
Thomas, R. 1988: Virgil Georgics, vol. 2, Books III–IV, Cambridge
Uden, J. 2011: The Invisibility of Juvenal, unpub. PhD dissertation, Columbia University
Wallace-Hadrill, A. 1982: ‘Civilis Princeps: between citizen and king’, Journal of Roman Studies 72, 3248
White, P. 1993: Promised Verse: Poets in the Society of Augustan Rome, Cambridge, MA
Williams, R. D. 1996: Aeneid: Books 1–6, London

Keywords

Recusatio as Political Theatre: Horace's Letter to Augustus*

  • Kirk Freudenburg (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed