Lausch, A, Chen, J, Ward, A, Gaede, S, Lee, T, Wong, E. An augmented parametric response map with consideration of image registration error: towards guidance of locally adaptive radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol
2014; 59 (22): 7039–7058.
Lim, G, Bezjak, A, Higgins, J
et al. Towards adaptive radiotherapy—role of image guidance on the radiotherapy treatment unit in assessing tumour change during a course of radical chemo-radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). J Thorac Oncol
2009; 4 (9): S530–S531.
Dutta, D, Balaji, S, Murli, V, Sudahar, H, Gopalakrishna, K, Potharaju, M. Dosimetric comparison of Linac-based (BrainLAB®) and robotic radiosurgery (CyberKnife®) stereotactic system plans for acoustic schwannoma. J Neurooncol
2012; 106 (3): 637–642.
Adams, R B, Marks, L, Pawlicki, T, Hayman, J, Church, J. The new radiation therapy clinical practice: the emerging role of clinical peer review for radiation therapists and medical dosimetrists. Med Dosim
2010; 35 (4): 320–323.
Marks, L B, Adams, R D, Pawlicki, T
et al. Enhancing the role of case-oriented peer review to improve quality and safety in radiation oncology: executive summary. Pract Radiat Oncol
2013; 3 (3): 149–156.
Boxer, M, Forstner, D, Kneebone, A
et al. Impact of a real-time peer review audit on patient management in a radiation oncology department. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol
2009; 53 (4): 405–411.
Brundage, M, Foxcroft, S, McGowan, T, Gutierrez, E, Sharpe, M, Warde, P. A survey of radiation treatment planning peer-review activities in a provincial radiation oncology programme: current practice and future directions. BMJ Open
2013; 3 (7): e003241.
Chamunyonga, C, Bridge, P. Radiation therapist peer review: raising the bar on quality and safety in radiation oncology. J Radiother Pract
2014; 13 (4): 484–489.
Matuszak, M M, Hadley, S W, Feng, M
et al. Enhancing safety and quality through preplanning peer review for patients undergoing Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy. Pract Radiat Oncol
2016; 6 (2): e39–e46.
Lo, A C, Liu, M, Chan, E
et al. The impact of peer review of volume delineation in Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy planning for primary lung cancer: a multicenter quality assurance study. J Thorac Oncol
2014; 9 (4): 527–533.
Kaewlai, R, Abujudeh, H. Peer review in clinical radiology practice. AJR Am J Roentgenol
2012; 199 (2): W158–W161.
Boehm, H, Bonnel, W. The use of peer review in nursing education and clinical practice. J Nurses Staff Dev
2010; 26 (3): 108–115.
Brunskill, K, Nguyen, T K, Boldt, R G
et al. Does peer review of radiation plans impact clinical care? A systematic review of the literature. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
2016; 96 (2): E541.
Hoopes, D J, Johnstone, P A, Chapin, P S
et al. Practice patterns for peer review in radiation oncology. Pract Radiat Oncol
2015; 5 (1): 32–38.
Rouette, J, Gutierrez, E, O’Donnell, J
et al. Directly improving the quality of radiation treatment through peer review: a cross-sectional analysis of cancer centres across a provincial cancer program. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.10.017.
Pham, N, Asper, J A, Bonnen, M, Jhaveri, P M. Pretreatment peer review: a way to increase efficiency and effectiveness of departmental peer review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
2016; 96 (2): E541.
Moeller, B, Liang, M, Bobo, W
et al. Rotational peer review: prospective evaluation of a novel physician peer review model in radiation oncology. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
2015; 93 (3): E493–E494.
Chi, M, Siler, S A, Jeong, H, Yamauchi, T, Hausmann, R G. Learning from human tutoring. Cogn Sci
2001; 25 (4): 471–533.
Drane, D, Smith, H D, Light, G, Pinto, L, Swarat, S. The gateway science workshop program: enhancing student performance and retention in the sciences through peer-facilitated discussion. J Sci Educ Technol
2005; 14 (3): 337–352.
Gormally, C, Evans, M, Brickman, P. Feedback about teaching in higher ed: neglected opportunities to promote change. CBE Life Sci Educ
2014; 13 (2): 187–199.
Braxton, J M, Jones, W A, Hirschy, A S, Hartley, I H. The role of active learning in college student persistence. New Dir Teach Learn
2008; 2008 (115): 71–83.
Bonwell, C C, Eison, J A. Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. Washington, DC: School of Education and Human Development, George Washington University, 1991.
Micari, M, Drane, D. Intimidation in small learning groups: the roles of social-comparison concern, comfort, and individual characteristics in student academic outcomes. Active Learn High Educ
2011; 12 (3): 175–187.
Bloom, L, Dole, S, Kowalske, K. Transforming pedagogy: changing perspectives from teacher-centered to learner-centered. Interdiscip J Probl Based Learn
2015; 10 (1): 45–58.
Volet, S, Vauras, M, Salonen, P. Self- and social regulation in learning contexts: an integrative perspective. Educ Psychol
2009; 44 (4): 215–226.
Athanassiou, N, McNett, J M, Harvey, C. Critical thinking in the management classroom: bloom’s taxonomy as a learning tool. J Manag Educ
2003; 27 (5): 533–555.
Semper, J, Halvorson, B, Hersh, M, Torres, C, Lillington, L. Clinical nurse specialists guide staff nurses to promote practice accountability through peer review. Clin Nurse Spec
2016; 30 (1): 19–27.
George, V, Haag-Heittman, B. Nursing peer review: the managers’ role. J Nurs Manag
2011; 19 (2): 254–259.
La Lopa, J M. A scholarly approach to a peer review of teaching. J Culinary Sci Technol
2012; 10 (4): 352–364.