Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T12:56:33.280Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reducing the skin dose from secondary electrons in kilovoltage radiotherapy: a pliable coating for custom lead cut-outs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2009

D.W. Thomas*
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, ABM University NHS Trust, Singleton Hospital, Sketty, Swansea, UK
J.A. Clark
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, ABM University NHS Trust, Singleton Hospital, Sketty, Swansea, UK
*
Correspondence to: D.W. Thomas, Radiotherapy Physics Service, Department of Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, ABM University NHS Trust, Singleton Hospital, Sketty, Swansea, UK. Email: Walter.Thomas@abm-tr.wales.nhs.uk

Abstract

Lead cut-outs used to shape fields in kilovoltage radiotherapy can increase the surface dose on the patient. The physical processes leading to increased surface doses are summarised, and an empirical investigation of the efficacy of various coatings in reducing the skin dose generated by secondary electrons released in the lead during irradiation is presented, based on measurements using a thin window parallel plate ionisation chamber in 135 kVp and 225 kVp beams from a Pantak DXT-300 kilovoltage therapy unit. A new flexible coating for lead cut-outs has been formulated and tested. This coating, which is a combination of Copydex and emulsion paint, has been shown to be effective in reducing the skin dose generated by secondary electrons released in the lead during irradiation. The coating is easy to clean, and its inherent elasticity prevents cracking of the coating in clinical use. Its only disadvantage is that rough handling, or contact with sharp objects, can peel the coating at the point of contact.

Type
Short Communication
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldrich, JE, Meng, JS, Andrew, JW. The surface doses from orthovoltage x-ray treatments. Med Dosim 1992; 17: 6972.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitton, JT. New values for epidermal thickness and their importance. Health Phys 1973; 24: 18.Google Scholar
ICRP. Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Publication 60. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press, 1991, pp. 152.Google Scholar
Klevenhagen, SC, D'Souza, D, Bonnefoux, I. Complications in low energy x-ray dosimetry caused by electron contamination. Phys Med Biol 1991; 36: 11111116.Google Scholar
Aukett, RJ, Thomas, DW, Seaby, AW, Gittins, JT. Performance characteristics of the Pantak DXT-300 kilovoltage X-ray treatment machine. Br J Radiol 1996; 69: 726734.Google Scholar