Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Radiotherapy educational research: a decade of innovation

  • Pete Bridge (a1)
  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Radiotherapy educational research: a decade of innovation
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Radiotherapy educational research: a decade of innovation
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Radiotherapy educational research: a decade of innovation
      Available formats
      ×

Abstract

Copyright

Corresponding author

Correspondence to: Pete Bridge, Directorate of Medical Imaging and Radiotherapy, University of Liverpool, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK. Tel: +44 0151 795 8366. E-mail: Pete.Bridge@liverpool.ac.uk

References

Hide All
1.Probst, H, Harris, R, McNair, H A, Baker, A, Miles, E A, Beardmore, C. Research from therapeutic radiographers: an audit of research capacity within the UK. Radiography 2015; 21 (2): 112118.
2.NHS England. Vision for radiotherapy (2014–2024). London: NHS, 2014.
3.Francis, R. Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry. London: The Stationery office, 2013.
4.Henriksen, A H, Ringsted, C. Learning from patients: students’ perceptions of patient-instructors. Med Educ 2011; 45 (9): 913919.
5.Hill, G, Thompson, G, Willis, S, Hodgson, D. Embracing service user involvement in radiotherapy education: a discussion paper. Radiography 2014; 20 (1): 8286.
6.Gidman, J. Listening to stories: valuing knowledge from patient experience. Nurse Educ Pract 2013; 13 (3): 192196.
7.Stickley, T, Stacey, G, Pollock, K, Smith, A, Betinis, J, Fairbank, S. The practice assessment of student nurses by people who use mental health services. Nurse Educ Today 2010; 30 (1): 2025.
8.Thomson, D, Hilton, R. An evaluation of students’ perceptions of a college-based programme that involves patients, carers and service users in physiotherapy education. Physiother Res Int 2012; 17 (1): 3647.
9.Carpenter, R. Using story theory to create an innovative honors level nursing course. Nurse Educ Perspect 2010; 31 (1): 2830.
10.Turnbull, P, Weeley, F M. Service user involvement: inspiring student nurses to make a difference to patient care. Nurse Educ Pract 2013; 13 (5): 454457.
11.Bleiker, J, Knapp, K M, Frampton, I. Teaching patient care to students: a blended learning approach in radiography education. Radiography 2011; 17 (3): 235240.
12.Perry, J, Watkins, M, Gilbert, A, Rawlinson, J. A systematic review of the evidence on service user involvement in interpersonal skills training of mental health students. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2013; 20 (6): 525540.
13.Towle, A, Bainbridge, L, Godolphin, Wet al.Active patient involvement in the education of health professionals. Med Educ 2010; 44 (1): 6474.
14.Williamson, K, White, E, Pope, E, Mundy, L. Learning from patients—an example of service user involvement in radiotherapy education. Clin Oncol 2009; 21 (3): 253255.
15.Bridge, P, Pirihi, C, Carmichael, M. The role of radiotherapy patients in provision of student interpersonal skills feedback. J Radiother Pract 2014; 13 (2): 141148.
16.Schon, D. Educating the Reflective Practitioner. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1987.
17.Newnham, J. To reflect or not? Reflective practice in radiation therapy. J Radiother Pract 1999; 1 (1): 109116.
18.The College of Radiographers. A Strategy for Continuing Professional Development. London: SCoR, 2003.
19.Brackenridge, S A. Perceptions of reflective practice among recent Australian radiation therapy graduates. Radiographer 2007; 54: 1823.
20.Smith, J. Emotional intelligence and professional education: the use of narrative journaling. Int J Learn 2009; 16 (7): 8192.
21.Codier, E, Codier, D. Do emergency nurses have enough emotional intelligence? Emerg Nurs 2015; 23 (3): 2629.
22.Libbrecht, N, Lievens, F, Carette, B, Côté, S. Emotional intelligence predicts success in medical school. Emotion 2014; 14 (1): 6473.
23.Carmichael, M, Bridge, P, Harriman, A. Emotional intelligence development in radiation therapy students; a longitudinal study. J Radiother Pract 2015 (In Press).
24.Fletcher, I, Leadbetter, P, Curran, A, O’Sullivan, H. A pilot study assessing emotional intelligence training and communication skills with third-year medical students. Patient Educ Couns 2009; 76: 376379.
25.Flowers, L K, Thomas-Squance, R, Brainin-Rodriguez, J E, Yancey, A K. Interprofessional social and emotional intelligence skills training: study findings and key lessons. J Interprof Care 2014; 28 (2): 157159.
26.Findlay, N, Dempsey, S, Warren-Forward, H. Validation and use of the Newcastle Reflective Analysis Tool: a three-year longitudinal study of RT students’ reflective journals. Reflect Pract 2010; 11 (1): 8394.
27.Guden, M, Ceylan, C, Berberoglu, Ket alContribution of PET-CT to staging, gross tumour volume definition, planning and response assessment in IMRT for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J Radiother Pract 2011; 10 (4): 272282.
28.Qi, X S, Wu, S, Newman, F, Li, X A, Hu, A Y. Evaluation of interfraction patient setup errors for image-guided prostate and head-and-neck radiotherapy using kilovoltage cone beam and megavoltage fan beam computed tomography. J Radiother Pract 2013; 12 (4): 334343.
29.Maungwe, P, Chamunyonga, C. A dosimetric retrospective planning study comparing volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) treatment plans for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). J Radiother Pract 2015; 14 (3): 260267.
30.Bridge, P. Does the photon have a future? An overview of potential benefits associated with hadron therapy. J Radiother Pract 2004; 4 (1): 2532.
31.RANZCR. Techniques and technologies in radiation oncology—2011 Horizon Scan. RANZCR, 2011. http://www.ranzcr.edu.au/organisation/faculty-radiation-oncology/899-faculty-publication. Accessed on 12 November 2015.
32.Bridge, P, Dempsey, S, Giles, Eet alPractice patterns of radiation therapy technology in Australia: results of a national audit. J Med Radiat Sci 2015 (In Press).
33.Waldon, A, Plank, A, Middleton, M. Analysis of online and offline head and neck image-guided radiation therapy. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 2014; 45 (2): 7984.
34.Hoskin, P J, Bhattacharya, I S. Protons and more: state of the art in radiotherapy. Clin Med 2014; 14 (suppl): s61s65.
35.Sale, C, Batson, A. Implementing results of a change process at the Andrew Love Cancer Centre—the axillary technique. Radiographer 2011; 58 (3): 1220.
36.Amols, H I. New technologies in radiation therapy: ensuring patient safety, radiation safety and regulatory issues in radiation oncology. Health Phys 2008; 95 (5): 658665.
37.Eynon, R. Harnessing technology: the learner and their context; how young people use technologies outside formal education. Survey Report. Coventry: Becta, 2009.
38.Horowitz, B. After Gen X, Millennials, what should next generation be? USA Today, 2012. http://usatoday30. usatoday.com/money/advertising/story/2012-05-03/naming-the-next-generation/54737518/1. Accessed on 12 November 2015.
39.Tapscott, D. Grown Up Digital: How the Net Generation is Changing Your World. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 2009.
40.Howe, N, Strauss, W. The next 20 years; how customer and workforce attitudes will evolve. Harvard Business Review, 2007. http://hbr.org/2007/07/the-next-20-years-how-customer-andworkforce-attitudes-will-evolve/ar/1. Accessed on 12 November 2015.
41.Robinson, S, Stubberud, H A. Communication preferences among university students. Acad Educ Leadersh J 2012; 16 (2): 105113.
42.Jones, C, Healing, G. Net generation students: agency and choice and the new technologies. J Comput Assist Learn 2010; 26 (5): 344356.
43.Tamim, R M, Mohammed, H B, Bernard, R M, Borokhovski, E, Abrami, P C, Schmid, R F. What forty years of research says about the impact of technology on learning: a second-order meta-analysis and validation study. Rev Educ Res 2011; 81 (1): 428.
44.Bernard, R M, Borokhovski, E, Schmid, R F. A meta-analysis of blended learning and technology use in higher education: from the general to the applied. J Comput High Educ 2014; 26 (1): 87122.
45.Bridge, P, Appleyard, R M. A comparison of electronic and paper-based assignment submission and feedback. Br J Educ Technol 2008; 39 (4): 644650.
46.Phillips, C R, Trainor, J E. Millennial students and the flipped classroom. J Bus Educ Lead 2014; 5 (1): 102112.
47.Probst, H, Eddy, D, Doughty, J. Integrating e-learning into postgraduate radiotherapy and oncology education: a case study. E-Learning 2009; 6 (4): 363371.
48.Ree, A H, Redalen, K R. Personalized radiotherapy: concepts, biomarkers and trial design. Br J Radiol 2015; 88 (1051): 113.
49.Vazquez-Cano, E. Mobile distance learning with smartphones and apps in higher education. Educ Sci Theory Pract 2014; 14 (5): 15051520.
50.Bridge, P, Appleyard, R M, Ward, J W, Philips, R, Beavis, A W. The development and evaluation of a virtual radiotherapy treatment machine using an immersive visualisation environment. Comput Educ 2007; 49 (2): 481494.
51.Flinton, D. Competency based assessment using a virtual environment for radiotherapy. Proc Comput Sci 2013; 25: 399401.
52.Carter, P J, Birak, K S, Magias, D, Hulse, M A, Willis, S J. The effectiveness of the Virtual Environment Radiotherapy Training (VERT) system as a teaching tool for anatomy. The First Annual Cyberpsychology Conference (ACPC), 19 September, Leicester: De Montfort University, 2013.
53.James, J, Sim, J, McDonald, M, Ryan, T. Using second life for health professional learning: informing multidisciplinary understanding. Int J Mod Educ Forum 2012; 1 (1): 2431.
54.Luctkar-Flude, M, Pulling, C, Medves, Jet alDevelopment and evaluation of an interprofessional simulation-based learning module on infection control skills for prelicensure health professional students. Clin Simul Nurs 2014; 10 (8): 395405.
55.Mosalanejad, L, Shahsavari, S, Sobhanian, S. The effect of virtual versus traditional learning in achieving competency-based skills. Turk Online J Distance Educ 2012; 13 (2): 6975.
56.Kim, S Y, Prestopnik, N, Biocca, F A. Body in the interactive game: how interface embodiment affects physical activity and health behavior change. Comput Hum Behav 2014; 36: 376384.
57.Ball, S, Bluteau, P, Clouder, L, Adefila, A, Graham, S. myShoes: an immersive simulation of dementia. Proceedings of the European Conference on e-Learning, 2015: 16–23.
58.Waters, J K. Could Oculus Rift redeem virtual reality in higher ed? Campus Technology Magazine 2014; 28 (3): 810.
59.Harris, M A, Pittiglio, L, Newton, S E, Moore, G. Using simulation to improve the medication administration skills of undergraduate nursing students. Nurs Educ Perspect 2014; 35 (1): 2629.
60.Cunico, L, Sartori, R, Marognolli, O, Meneghini, A M. Developing empathy in nursing students: a cohort longitudinal study. J Clin Nurs 2012; 21: 1314.
61.Rush, S, Firth, T, Burke, L, Marks-Maran, D. Implementation and evaluation of peer assessment of clinical skills for first year student nurses. Nurse Educ Pract 2012; 12 (4): 1926.
62.Hoskin, P J, Forbes, H, Ball, C, Riley, D, Cooper, T. Variations in radiotherapy delivery in England—evidence from the national radiotherapy dataset. Clin Oncol 2013; 25 (9): 531537.
63.Haviland, J S, Owen, J R, Dewar, J Aet alThe UK Standardisation of Breast Radiotherapy (START) trials of radiotherapy hypofractionation for treatment of early breast cancer: 10-year follow-up results of two randomised controlled trials. Lancet Oncol 2013; 14 (11): 10861094.
64.Siska, J, van Swet, J, Pather, S, Rose, D. From vision to reality: managing tensions in the development and implementation of an international collaborative partnership programme for institutional change and sustainable development in inclusive education. Int J Inclus Educ 2013; 17 (4): 336348.

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed