Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T16:18:52.524Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The importance of communication skills required to reduce set-up errors in the radiotherapy planning phase

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2019

A. Merlotti Open the ORCID record for A. Merlotti [Opens in a new window] ,
A. Reali  and
E. Russi
A. Merlotti*
Affiliation:
Department of Radiation Oncology, S. Croce University Hospital, Cuneo, Italy
A. Reali
Affiliation:
Department of Radiation Oncology, S. Croce University Hospital, Cuneo, Italy
E. Russi
Affiliation:
Department of Radiation Oncology, S. Croce University Hospital, Cuneo, Italy
*
Author for correspondence: A. Merlotti, via M.Coppino 26, 12100 Cuneo, Italy. Tel: +39 0171641327. E-mail: anna.merlotti@virgilio.it
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

During the planning computed tomography (CT) scan, patients experience the position and any immobilisation technique required for radiotherapy.

Patient’s stress and anxiety can cause muscle tension that can introduce systematic set-up errors if not recognised and corrected.

We discuss two clinical cases that highlight the importance of time dedicated to communication and revision of the first CT acquisition during a virtual simulation procedure.

Keywords

communicationradiotherapyset-up errorstreatment accuracyvirtual simulation
Type
Case Study
Information
Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice , Volume 18 , Issue 4 , December 2019 , pp. 395 - 396
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Malicki, J. The importance of accurate treatment planning, delivery, and dose verification. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2012; 17: 63–65.10.1016/j.rpor.2012.02.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van der Merwe, D, Van Dyk, J, Healy, B et al. Accuracy requirements and uncertainties in radiotherapy: a report of the International Atomic Energy Agency. Acta Oncol 2017; 56: 1–6.10.1080/0284186X.2016.1246801CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, F, Merckaert, I, Liénard, A et al. Anxiety and its time courses during radiotherapy for non-metastatic breast cancer: a longitudinal study. Radiother Oncol J Eur Soc Ther Radiol Oncol 2014; 111: 276–280.10.1016/j.radonc.2014.03.016CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Budach, W, Bölke, E, Fietkau, R et al. Evaluation of time, attendance of medical staff, and resources during radiotherapy for head and neck cancer patients: the DEGRO-QUIRO trial. Strahlenther Onkol 2011; 187: 449–460.10.1007/s00066-011-2273-zCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed