Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T08:49:25.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Impact of software changes: Transit dose and source position accuracy of the Eckert & Ziegler BEBIG GmbH MultiSource® high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy treatment unit

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 August 2012

A. Palmer
A. Palmer*
Affiliation:
Radiotherapy Physics, Medical Physics Department, Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, United Kingdom Department of Physics, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Science, University of Surrey, United Kingdom
*
Correspondence to: Antony Palmer, Head of Radiotherapy Physics, Medical Physics Department (Radiotherapy), F-Level, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Portsmouth, United Kingdom. E-mail: antony.palmer@porthosp.nhs.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Purpose: Medical device performance checks are essential following changes to control system software. This work investigates the effects of new software on the performance of a high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy treatment unit.

Methods and Materials: A performance assessment was undertaken of the Eckert & Ziegler BEBIG GmbH MultiSource® HDR treatment unit following software upgrade. Video recordings of source transits were used to calculate transit doses, and autoradiography used to measure source dwell positions. Results were compared to a previous study.1

Results: All results showed improved performance with the new compared to old control software. Optimal source movement profiles were observed with maximum transit speeds of 63 (+/−4) mm s−1 between dwells of 5.0 mm separation. The maximum error in transit dose correction with the new software was 2.5 % at 10.0 mm perpendicular from the source axis, compared to 5.6 % previously. The new software eliminated a causal relationship between curvature of the source transfer tubes and dwell position uncertainty.

Conclusions: This work demonstrates the need for comprehensive medical device system checks following software changes. Technical improvements in HDR device performance have been achieved with the new software; reducing transit doses, improving transit dose correction, and improving source positioning accuracy.

Keywords

HDR high dose rateQCtransit dosedwell positionaccuracysoftware
Type
Technical Note
Information
Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , March 2013 , pp. 80 - 87
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Palmer, A, Mzenda, B. Performance assessment of the BEBIG Multisource® high dose rate brachytherapy treatment unit. Phys Med Biol 2009; 54:7417–7434.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Menon, GV, Carlone, MC, Sloboda, RS. Transit dose contributions to intracavitary and interstitial PDR brachytherapy treatments. Phys Med Biol 2008; 53:3447–3462.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Minamisawa, RA, Rubo, RA, Seraide, RM, Rocha, JRO and Almeida, A. Direct measurement of instantaneous source speed for a HDR brachytherapy unit using an optical fiber based detector. Med Phys 2010; 37:5407–5411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yewondwossen, M. Measurement of transit dose of an Ir-192 HDR brachytherapy stepping source using a 2D-array of ion chambers. Med Phys 2011; 38:3573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rickey, DW, Sasaki, D, Bews, J. A quality assurance tool for high-dose-rate brachytherapy. Med Phys 2010; 37:2525–2532.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pawlicki, T, Dunscombe, PB, Mundt, AJ, Scalliet, P. Quality and safety in radiotherapy. Boca Raton, Taylor & Francis 2011. ISBN: 978-1-4398-0436-0.Google Scholar
McDermott, PN, Somnay, AR, Alecu, R. Acceptance testing and commissioning of a new model HDR afterloader. Radiother Oncol 1996; 39:S25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, AB. Acceptance testing, commissioning and quality assurance for a 370GBq Ir-192 HDR brachytherapy afterloader. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 1997; 20:112–116.Google Scholar
McGarry, C, O’Toole, M, Cosgrove, V. Characterising intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) software following upgrades in a commercial treatment planning system. Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice 2010; 9:209–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granero, D, Perez-Calatayud, J. Study of a new Co-60 source used in brachytherapy. Med Phys 2007; 34:3485–3488.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spiller, A; on behalf of Eckert & Ziegler GmbH. Personal communication with the author via email, July 2011.Google Scholar