1. International Atomic Energy Agency. Safety Glossary: Terminology Used in Nuclear Safety and Radiation Protection, 2007 edition. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency, 2007.
2. Atomic Energy Regulatory Board. Glossary of Terms for Nuclear and Radiation Safety, Guide No. AERB/SG/GLO. Mumbai: Atomic Energy Regulatory Board, 2005.
4. Atomic Energy (Radiation Protection) Rules 2004. Published in the Gazette of India: 11 September 2004] Part –II, Section 3, Sub-Section (i). http://dae.nic.in/writereaddata/RPR2004.pdf. Accessed on 12th May 2017.
5. Atomic Energy Regulatory Board. Surveillance Procedures for Medical Application of Radiation 1989. Mumbai: Atomic Energy Regulatory Board, 2005.
6. Atomic Energy Regulatory Board. Safety Code on Radiation Therapy Sources, Equipment, and Installations, AERB/RF-MED/SC-1 (Rev.1). Mumbai: Atomic Energy Regulatory Board, 2011.
7. Atomic Energy Regulatory Board. Safety Code on Safe Transport of Radioactive Material, AERB/NRF-TS/SC-1 (Rev.1). Mumbai: Atomic Energy Regulatory Board, 2016.
8. Atomic Energy Regulatory Board. Testing and Classification of Sealed Radioactive Sources, AERB/SS/3 (Rev.1). Mumbai: Atomic Energy Regulatory Board, 2001.
9. Atomic Energy Regulatory Board. Safety Guide on Security of Radioactive Sources in Radiation Facilities, AERB/RF-RS/SG-1. Mumbai: Atomic Energy Regulatory Board, 2011.
10. Atomic Energy Regulatory Board. Safety Guide on Security of Radioactive Material During Transport, AERB/NRF-TS/SG-10. Mumbai: Atomic Energy Regulatory Board, 2008.
12. Chang, D W, Cheetham, L, te Marvelde, L et al. Risk factors for radiotherapy incidents and impact of an online electronic reporting system. Radiother Oncol 2014; 112 (2): 199–204.
13. International Atomic Energy Agency. Lessons Learned From Accidental Exposures in Radiotherapy, Safety Reports Series No. 17. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency, 2000.
14. International Commission on Radiological Protection. Prevention of Accidents to Patients Undergoing Radiation Therapy. ICRP Publication 86. Annals of ICRP 30(3). Oxford: Pergamon Press, 2000.
15. Ortiz, P, Oresegun, M, Wheatley, J. Lessons from major radiation accidents. Proceedings of the 10th International Congress of the International Radiation Protection Association, 14th–19th May, Hiroshima 2000. http://www.irpa.net/irpa10/cdrom/00140.pdf. Accessed on 15th May 2017.
16. Stavem, P, Brøgger, A, Devik, F et al. Lethal acute gamma radiation accident at Kjeller, Norway: Report of a case. Acta Radiol Oncol 1985; 24 (1): 61–63.
17. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Lessons Learned from the Response to Radiation Emergencies (1945–2000). Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), 2012.
18. Nénot, J C. Radiation accidents over the last 60 years. J Radiol Prot 2009; 29 (3): 301.
19. Covello, V T, Slovic, P, Von Winterfeldt, D. Risk Communication: A Review of the Literature. Risk Abstracts 1986; 3 (4): 172–182.
20. Mary, D. Risk Acceptability According to the Social Sciences. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1986.
21. Freudenburg, W R. Perceived risk, real risk: social science and the art of probabilistic risk assessment. Science 1988; 242 (4875): 44–49.
22. Gregory, R, Mendelsohn, R. Perceived risk, dread, and benefits. Risk Anal 1993; 13 (3): 259–264.
23. Hoos, I. Risk Assessment in Social Perspective. Perceptions of Risk. Washington: National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurement, 1980.
24. Hughes, P, Ferrett, E. Introduction to International Health and Safety at Work. London: Routledge, 2010.
25. Mazur, A. Does public perception of risk explain the social response to potential hazard. Q J Ideol 1987; 11 (2): 41–45.
26. Kasperson, R E, Renn, O, Slovic, P et al. The social amplification of risk: a conceptual framework. Risk Anal 1988; 8 (2): 177–187.
27. Renn, O, Burns, W J, Kasperson, J X, Kasperson, R E, Slovic, P. The social amplification of risk: theoretical foundations and empirical applications. J Soc Issues 1992; 48 (4): 137–160.
28. Slovic, P, Fischhoff, B, Lichtenstein, S. Why study risk perception. Risk Anal 1982; 2: 83–93.
29. Slovic, P. The Perception of Risk. London: Routledge, 2016.
30. Singh, T D, Jayaraman, T, Sharma, B A. Assessment of radiological protection systems among diagnostic radiology facilities in North East India. J Radiol Prot 2016; 37 (1): 68.
31. Stenzel, P L. Acceptable risk?: Making decisions in a toxic environment by Lee Clarke. DePaul Law Rev 2014; 40 (4): 1165.
32. Barke, R P, Jenkins‐Smith, H C. Politics and scientific expertise: scientists, risk perception, and nuclear waste policy. Risk Anal 1993; 13 (4): 425–439.
33. Johnson, B B. Advancing understanding of knowledge’s role in lay risk perception. Risk 1993; 4: 189.
34. Tversky, A, Kahneman, D. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science. 1974; 185 (4157): 1124–1131.
35. Finucane, M L, Alhakami, A, Slovic, P, Johnson, S M. The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. J Behav Decis Mak 2000; 13 (1): 1–17.
36. Kumar, R V, Bhasker, S. Is the fast-paced technological advancement in radiation treatment equipment good for Indian scenario?. J Cancer Policy 2015; 4: 26–30.
37. Dikshit, K R, Dikshit, J K. North-east India: land, people and economy. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer, 2014.
38. Shimray, U A. Socio-political unrest in the region called North-East India. Econ Polit Wkly 2004; 39 (42): 4637–4643.
39. Atomic Energy Regulatory Board. Regulatory Inspection and Enforcement in Radiation Facilities, Manual NO. AERB/RF/SM/G-3. Mumbai: Atomic Energy Regulatory Board.
40. International Atomic Energy Agency. Applying Radiation Safety Standards in Radiotherapy, Safety Reports Series No. 38. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency, 2006.
41. International Atomic Energy Agency. Inspection of Radiation Sources and Regulatory Enforcement (Supplement to IAEA Safety Standards Series No. GS-G-1.5). Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), 2007.
42. Cha, Y J. An analysis of nuclear risk perception: with focus on developing effective policy alternatives. Int Rev Public Admin 2004; 8 (2): 33–47.
43. World Health Organization (WHO). Quality Assurance in Radiotherapy. Geneva: WHO, 1988.
45. Yeung, T K, Bortolotto, K, Cosby, S, Hoar, M, Lederer, E. Quality assurance in radiotherapy: evaluation of errors and incidents recorded over a 10 year period. Radiother Oncol 2005; 74 (3): 283–291.
46. Diefenbach, T. Hierarchy and Organisation: Toward a General Theory of Hierarchical Social Systems. New York, NY: Routledge, 2013.
47. Stoddart, M C. Ideology, hegemony, discourse: a critical review of theories of knowledge and power. Social Thought Res 2007; 28: 191–225.