Skip to main content Accessibility help

Lobbying, learning and policy reinvention: an examination of the American States’ drunk driving laws

  • Jinhai Yu (a1), Edward T. Jennings (a2) and J. S. Butler (a2)


Scholars have consistently shown that learning of successful policies in other states leads to higher likelihood of policy adoption. This study extends this finding two ways. First, policy learning can also lead to more comprehensive adoption of successful policies. Second, the effect of policy learning on policy comprehensiveness is conditional on lobbying by interest groups, an alternative source of information about policy success. To test these hypotheses, we conduct a directed dyad-year analysis using a dataset on American state drunk driving regulations from 1983 to 2000. The results show that more comprehensive policy adoption by states is positively related to policy success in other states when lobbying by Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD) is relatively low. Moreover, lobbying by MADD increases policy comprehensiveness when policy success is relatively low. This study advances the literature by examining the conditional effects of lobbying on the relationship between policy learning and policy reinvention.


Corresponding author

*Corresponding author. Email:


Hide All
Austen-Smith, D (1993) Information and Influence: Lobbying for Agendas and Votes. American Journal of Political Science 37(3): 799833.
Austen-Smith, D (1995) Campaign Contributions and Access. American Political Science Review 89(3): 566581.
Austen-Smith, DJohn, RW (1994) Counteractive Lobbying. American Journal of Political Science 38(1): 2544.
Balla, SJ (2001) Interstate Professional Associations and the Diffusion of Policy Innovations. American Politics Research 29(3): 221245.
Bennedsen, MSven, EF (2006) Informational Lobbying and Political Contributions. Journal of Public Economics 90(4): 631656.
Berry, WD, Ringquist, EJ, Fording, RCHanson, RL (1998) Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States, 1960–93. American Journal of Political Science 42(1): 327348.
Berry, WD, Fording, RC, Ringquist, EJ, Hanson, RLKlarner, CE (2010) Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the US States: A Re-appraisal. State Politics & Policy Quarterly 10(2): 117135.
Boehmke, FJ (2009a) Policy Emulation or Policy Convergence? Potential Ambiguities in the Dyadic Event History Approach to State Policy Emulation. The Journal of Politics 71(3): 11251140.
Boehmke, FJ (2009b) Approaches to Modeling the Adoption and Diffusion of Policies with Multiple Components. State Politics & Policy Quarterly 9(2): pp. 229252.
Boushey, G (2010) Policy Diffusion Dynamics in America. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Brambor, T, Clark, WRGolder, M (2006) Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses. Political analysis 14(1): 6382.
Butler, DM, Volden, C, Dynes, AMShor, B (2015) Ideology, Learning, and Policy Diffusion: Experimental Evidence. American Journal of Political Science 61(1): 4749.
Callander, S (2011) Searching for Good Policies. American Political Science Review 105(4): 643662.
Carley, S, Nicholson-Crotty, SMiller, CJ (2016) Adoption, Reinvention and Amendment of Renewable Portfolio Standards in the American States. Journal of Public Policy 37(4), 128.
Clark, J (1985) Policy Diffusion and Program Scope: Research Directions. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 15(4): 6170.
Cotton, C (2012) Pay-to-Play Politics: Informational Lobbying and Contribution Limits When Money Buys Access. Journal of Public Economics 96(3): 369386.
Eisenberg, D (2003) Evaluating the Effectiveness of Policies Related to Drunk Driving. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 22(2): pp. 249274.
Fell, JCRobert, BV (2006) Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD): The First 25 Years. Traffic Injury Prevention 7(3): 195212.
Garrett, KNJoshua, MJ (2015) Interest Group Influence in Policy Diffusion Networks. State Politics & Policy Quarterly 15(3): 387417.
Gilardi, F (2010) Who Learns from What in Policy Diffusion Processes? American Journal of Political Science 54(3): 650666.
Gilardi, FFüglister, K (2008) Empirical Modeling of Policy Diffusion in Federal States: The Dyadic Approach. Swiss Political Science Review 14(3): 413450.
Gilardi, F, Füglister, KLuyet, S (2009) Learning from Others: The Diffusion of Hospital Financing Reforms in OECD Countries. Comparative Political Studies 42(4): 549573.
Glick, HRScott, PH (1991) Innovation and Reinvention in State Policymaking: Theory and the Evolution of Living Will Laws. The Journal of Politics 53(03): 835850.
Gracey, KJ (2015) Mapping Geographical Variation in Denominational Adherence: Finding the Faithful and the Faithless.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, CA, 2–6 September.
Grasse, NHeidbreder, B (2011) The Influence of Lobbying Activity in State Legislatures: Evidence from Wisconsin. Legislative Studies Quarterly 36(4): 567589.
Haider-Markel, DP (2001) Policy Diffusion as a Geographical Expansion of the Scope of Political Conflict: Same-Sex Marriage Bans in the 1990s. State Politics & Policy Quarterly 1(1): 526.
Hall, RLAlan, VD (2006) Lobbying as Legislative Subsidy. American Political Science Review 100(1): 6984.
Hays, SP (1996a) Influences on Reinvention during the Diffusion of Innovations. Political research quarterly 49(3): 631650.
Hays, SP (1996b) Patterns of Reinvention. Policy Studies Journal 24(4): 551566.
Karch, A (2007) Democratic Laboratories: Policy Diffusion among the American States. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
Kim, A-SJennings, E (2012) The Evolution of an Innovation: Variations in Medicaid Managed Care Program Extensiveness. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 37(5): 815849.
Kreitzer, RJ (2015) Politics and Morality in State Abortion Policy. State Politics & Policy Quarterly 15(1): pp. 4166.
Langbein, LIMark, AL (1990) The Political Efficacy of Lobbying and Money: Gun Control in the US House, 1986. Legislative Studies Quarterly 15(3): 413440.
Lohmann, S (1995) Information, Access, and Contributions: A Signaling Model of Lobbying. Public Choice 85(3): 267284.
Macinko, JSilver, D (2015) Diffusion of Impaired Driving Laws among US States. American Journal of Public Health 105(9): 18931900.
Macinko, J, Silver, D, Bae, JY, Jimenez, G, Paul, MMueller, A (2014) The State Health Policy Research Dataset (SHEPRD): 1980-2010. ICPSR34789-v2. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2014-09-24.
Marshall, MOleson, A (1994) In the Pink: MADD and Public Health Policy in the 1990s. Journal of Public Health Policy 15(1): 5470.
Mero, JR (2009) Under the Influence: Has MADD’s Policy Agenda Limited the Elks’ Capability to Create Social Capital?. Dissertation: Syracuse University.
Mooney, CZLee, M-H (1999) Morality Policy Reinvention: State Death Penalties. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 566(1): 8092.
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (2014) “Drivers Involved in Fatal Traffic Crashes By State and Their BAC.”, (March, 2015).
Nicholson-Crotty, SCarley, S (2016) Effectiveness, Implementation, and Policy Diffusion: Or “Can We Make That Work for Us?”. State Politics & Policy Quarterly 16(1): 7897.
Pianin, E Alcohol Lobby Fights Drunken Driving Bill”, Washington Post, March 26, 1998.
Reinarman, C (1988) The Social Construction of an Alcohol Problem. Theory and Society 17(1): 91120.
Rice, REEverett, MR (1980) Reinvention in the Innovation Process. Knowledge 1(4): 499514.
Rogers, EM (2003) Diffusion of Innovations. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
Russell, A, Voas, RB, DeJong, WChaloupka, M (1995) MADD Rates the States: A Media Advocacy Event to Advance the Agenda Against Alcohol-Impaired Driving. Public Health Reports 110(3): 240.
Schnakenberg, KE (2017) Informational Lobbying and Legislative Voting. American Journal of Political Science 61(1): 129145.
Shipan, CRVolden, C (2008) The Mechanisms of Policy Diffusion. American Journal of Political Science 52(4): 840857.
Shipan, CRVolden, C (2014) When the Smoke Clears: Expertise, Learning and Policy Diffusion. Journal of Public Policy 34(03): 357387.
Squire, P (2007) Measuring State Legislative Professionalism: The Squire Index Revisited. State Politics & Policy Quarterly 7(2): 211227.
Stratmann, T (1991) What Do Campaign Contributions Buy? Deciphering Causal Effects of Money and Votes. Southern Economic Journal 57(3): 606620.
Stratmann, T (1998) The Market for Congressional Votes: Is Timing of Contributions Everything? The Journal of Law and Economics 41(1): 85114.
Stratmann, T (2002) Can Special Interests Buy Congressional Votes? Evidence from Financial Services Legislation. The Journal of Law and Economics 45(2): 345373.
Volden, C (2006) States as Policy Laboratories: Emulating Success in the Children’s Health Insurance Program. American Journal of Political Science 50(2): 294312.
Volden, C, Michael, MTDaniel, PC (2008) A Formal Model of Learning and Policy Diffusion. American Political Science Review 102(03): 319332.
Walker, JL (1969) The Diffusion of Innovations among the American States. American Political Science Review 63(03): 880899.


Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

Yu et al. supplementary material
Appendices 1-4

 Word (31 KB)
31 KB
Supplementary materials

Yu et al. Dataset



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed