Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Do policy instruments matter? Governments’ choice of policy mix and higher education performance in Western Europe

  • Giliberto Capano (a1), Andrea Pritoni (a2) and Giulia Vicentini (a3)

Abstract

Governments pursue their goals by adopting various mixes of policy instruments. This article proposes a specific operationalisation of these mixes and applies it to the analysis of reforms that many Western European governments have pursued, as they have adopted a similar policy design in their higher education systems (HESs) over the last 20 years. In fact, although these policies have similar templates, performance indicators exhibit remarkable variation between countries. Thus, by applying Qualitative Comparative Analysis to a large data set containing all changes in policy instruments undertaken in the last 20 years in 12 HESs in Western Europe, this article explores the possibility that differences in performance across national HESs could be associated – ceteris paribus – with different policy mixes. This article finds not only that the common template has been applied through very different national policy mixes but also that only a few instruments are regularly linked to good teaching performance, regardless of the other components of the actual policy mix.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Do policy instruments matter? Governments’ choice of policy mix and higher education performance in Western Europe
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Do policy instruments matter? Governments’ choice of policy mix and higher education performance in Western Europe
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Do policy instruments matter? Governments’ choice of policy mix and higher education performance in Western Europe
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Corresponding author. Email: giliberto.capano@unibo.it

Footnotes

Hide All

Cite this article: Capano G, Pritoni A, Vicentini G. 2019. Do policy instruments matter? Governments’ choice of policy mix and higher education performance in Western Europe. Journal of Public Policy XX: 1–27, doi: 10.1017/S0143814X19000047

Footnotes

References

Hide All
Aghion, P, Dewatripont, M, Hoxby, C, Mas-Colell, A Sapir, A (2008) Higher Aspirations: An Agenda for Reforming European Universities. Brussels: Bruegel.
Aghion, P, Dewatripont, M, Hoxby, C, Mas-Colell, A Sapir, A (2010) The Governance and Performance of Universities: Evidence from Europe and the US. Economic Policy 25(61): 759.
Ansell, BW (2008) University Challenges: Explaining Institutional Change in Higher Education. World Politics 60(1): 189230.
Bouwma, I, Liefferink, D, Apeldoorn, RV Arts, B (2016) Following Old Paths or Shaping New Ones in Natura 2000 Implementation? Mapping Path Dependency in Instrument Choice. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 18(2): 214233.
Braumoeller, BF (2015) Guarding Against False Positives in Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Political Analysis 23(4): 471487.
Braun, D Merrien, F-X (eds.) (1999) Towards a New Model of Governance for Universities?. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Braga, M, Checchi, D Meschi, E (2013) Educational Policies in a Long-Run Perspective. Economic Policy 28(73): 45100.
Bressers, H, Laurence, TA O’Toole, J (2005) Instrument Selection and Implementation in a Networked Context. In Eliades P , Hill M and Howlett M (eds.), Designing Government: From Instruments to Governance. Montreal, QC and Kingston, ON: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 132153.
Capano, G (2011) Government Continues to Do Its Job. A Comparative Study of Governance Shifts in the Higher Education Sector. Public Administration 89(4): 16221642.
Capano, G, Howlett, M Ramesh, M (eds.) (2015) Varieties of Governance. London: Palgrave.
Capano, G, Rayner, J Zito, AR (2012) Governance from the Bottom Up: Complexity and Divergence in Comparative Perspective. Public Administration 90(1): 5673.
Capano, G Regini, M (2014) Governance Reforms and Organizational Dilemmas in European Universities. Comparative Education Review 56(1): 73103.
Capano, G, Regini, M Turri, M (2016) Changing Governance in Universities. Italian Higher Education in Comparative Perspective. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
Capano, G Pritoni, A (2019) Varieties of Hybrid Systemic Governance in European Higher Education. Higher Education Quarterly 73(1): 1028.
Capano, G Turri, M (2017) Same Governance Template but Different Agencies. Types of Evaluation Agencies in Higher Education. Comparing England, France, and Italy. Higher Education Policy 30(2): 225243.
CHEPS (2006) The Extent and Impact of Higher Education Governance Reform Across Europe. Final Report to the Directorate General for Education and Culture OfEuropean Commission, http://ec.europa.eu/education/ (accessed 12 January 2018).
Clark, BR (1983) The Higher Education System. Academic Organization in Cross National Perspective. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Considine, M Lewis, JM (1999) Governance at Ground Level: The Frontline Bureaucrat in the Age of Markets and Networks. Public Administration Review 59(6): 467480.
Dobbins, M Knill, C (2009) Higher education policies in central and eastern Europe: Convergence toward a common model? Governance 22(3): 397430.
Dobbins, M Knill, C (2014) Higher Education Governance and Policy Change in Western Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Enders, J, De Boer, H Weyer, E (2013) Regulatory Autonomy and Performance: The Reform of Higher Education Revisited. Higher Education 65(1): 523.
Flannery, D O’Donoghue, C (2011) The Life-Cycle Impact of Alternative Higher Education Finance Systems in Ireland. The Economic and Social Review 42(3): 237270.
Gornitzka, Å, Kogan, M Amaral, A (eds.) (2005) Reform and Change in Higher Education. Dordrecht: Springer.
Hacker, JS (2004) Reform Without Change, Change Without Reform: The Politics of US Health Policy Reform in Comparative Perspective. In Levin MA and Shapiro M (eds.), Transatlantic Policymaking in an Age of Austerity: Diversity and Drift. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 1363.
Hood, C (1983) The Tools of Government. London: Macmillan.
Horeau, C, Ritzen, J Marconi, G (2013) Higher Education and Economic Innovation, a Comparison of European Countries. IZA Journal of European Labor Studies 2(1): 224.
Howlett, M (2000) Managing the ‘Hollow State’: Procedural Policy Instruments and Modern Governance. Canadian Public Administration 43(4): 412431.
Howlett, M (2005) What is a Policy Instrument? Policy Tools, Policy Mixes and Policy-Implementation Styles. In Eliadis P , Hill MM and Howlett M (eds.), Designing Government. From Instruments to Governance. Montreal, QC and Kingston, ON: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 311350.
Howlett, M (2009) Governance Modes, Policy Regimes and Operational Plans: A Multi-Level Nested Model of Policy Instrument Choice and Policy Design. Policy Sciences 42(1): 7389.
Howlett, M (2011) Designing Public Policies: Principles and Instruments. London: Routledge.
Howlett, M Del Rio, P (2015) The Parameters of Policy Portfolios: Verticality and Horizontality in Design Spaces and Their Consequences for Policy Mix Formulation. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 33, 12331245.
Huisman, J (eds.) (2009) International Perspectives on the Governance of Higher Education. London: Routledge.
Huitema, D Meijerink, S (eds.) (2009) Water Policy Entrepreneurs: A Research Companion to Water Transitions Around the Globe. Camberley, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Knott, JH Payne, A (2004) The Impact of State Governance Structures on Management and Performance of Public Organizations: A Study of Higher Education Institutions. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 23(1): 1330.
Koontz, TM Thomas, CW (2012) Measuring the Performance of Public-Private Partnerships: A Systematic Method for Distinguishing Outputs from Outcomes. Public Performance & Management Review 35(4): 769786.
Ingram, H Schneider, AI (1990) The Behavioral Assumptions of Policy Tools. The Journal of Politics 52(2): 510529.
Jordan, A, Benson, D, Zito, A Wurzel, RKW (2012) Environmental Policy: Governing by Multiple Policy Instruments?. In Richardson J (ed.), Constructing a Policy State? Policy Dynamics in the EU. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 104124.
Lazzaretti, L Tavoletti, E (2006) Governance Shifts in Higher Education: A Cross National Comparison. European Educational Research Journal 5(1): 1837.
Liefner, I (2003) Funding, Resource Allocation, and Performance in Higher Education Systems. Higher Education 46(4): 469489.
Linder, S Peters, GB (1990) An Institutional Approach to the Theory of Policymaking: The Role of Conscious Choice in Policy Formulation. The Journal of Theoretical Politics 2, 5983.
Maassen, P Olsen, JP (eds.) (2007) University Dynamics and European Integration. Dordrecht: Springer.
Neave, G (2012) The Evaluative State, Institutional Autonomy and Re-engineering Higher Education in Western Europe. London: Palgrave.
Organization for Economic, Cooperation and Development (OECD) (1998) Education at a Glance 2008. Paris: OECD.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2007) Instruments Mixes for Environmental Policy. Paris: OECD.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2010) OECD Science,Technology and Industry Outlook 2010. Paris: OECD.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2016) Education at a Glance 2016. Paris: OECD.
Paradeise, C, Reale, E, Bleiklie, I Ferlie, E (eds.) (2009) University Governance. Western European Comparative Perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer.
Phidd, RW Doern, GB (eds.) (1983) Canadian Public Policy: Ideas, Structure, Process. Toronto, ON: Methuen.
Pierson, C (2004) The Modern State. London: Routledge.
Rabovsky, TM (2012) Accountability in Higher Education: Exploring Impacts on State Budgets and Institutional Spending Patterns. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 22(4): 675700.
Ragin, CC (1987) The Comparative Method. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Ragin, CC (2000) Fuzzy-Set Social Science. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Ragin, CC (2006) Set Relations in Social Research: Evaluating their Consistency and Coverage. Political Analysis 14(3): 291310.
Ragin, CC (2008) Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Richardson, R Martinez, M (2009) Policy and Performance in American Higher Education: An Examination of Cases Across State Systems. Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press.
Rihoux, B, Álamos-Concha, P, Bol, D, Marx, A Rezsöhazy, I (2013) From Niche to Mainstream Method? A Comprehensive Mapping of QCA Application in Journal Articles from 1984 to 2011. Political Research Quarterly 66(1): 175184.
Rihoux, B Ragin, CC (eds.) (2009) Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques. Los Angeles, CA, USA: Sage.
Ring, I Schroter-Schlaack, C (2010) Instrument Mixes for Biodiversity Policies. Leipzig: Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research.
Rohlfing, I (2018) Power and False Negatives in Qualitative Comparative Analysis: Foundations, Simulation and Estimation for Empirical Studies. Political Analysis 26(1): 7289.
Rosa, MJ Amaral, A (eds.) (2014) Quality Assurance in Higher Education. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Rutherford, A Rabovsky, T (2014) Evaluating Impacts of Performance Funding Policies on Student Outcomes in Higher Education. The Annals of The American Academy of Political and Social Science 655(1): 185209.
Salamon, LM (ed.) (2002) The Tools of Government: A Guide to the New Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schaffrin, A, Sewerin, S Seubert, S (2014) The Innovativeness of National Policy Portfolios – Climate Policy Change in Austria, Germany, and the UK. Environmental Politics 23(5): 860883.
Schneider, CQ Rohlfing, I (2013) Combining QCA and Process Tracing in Set-Theoretic Multi-Method Research. Sociological Methods & Research 42(4): 559597.
Schneider, CQ Wagemann, C (2010) Standards of Good Practice in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Fuzzy-Sets. Comparative Sociology 9(3): 397418.
Schneider, CQ Wagemann, C (2012) Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shattock, ML (ed.) (2014) International Trends in University Governance. London: Routledge.
Tandberg, D Hillman, N (2014) State Higher Education Performance Funding: Data, Outcomes, and Policy Implications. Journal of Education Finance 39(3): 222243.
Tollefson, C, Zito, AR Gale, F (2012) Symposium Overview: Conceptualizing New Governance Arrangements. Public Administration 90(1): 318.
Tosun, J (2013) Risk Regulation in Europe. Assessing the Application of the Precautionary Principle. New York: Springer.
Trakman, L (2008) Modelling University Governance. Higher Education Quarterly 62(1–2): 6383.
Treib, O, Bahr, H Falkner, G (2007) Modes of Governance: Towards a Conceptual Clarification. Journal of European Public Policy 14(1): 120.
Vedung, E (1998) Policy Instruments: Typologies and Theories. In Bemelmans-Videc M-L , Rist RC and Vedung E (eds.), Carrots, Sticks, and Sermons: Policy Instruments and Their Evaluation. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 2158.
Vis, B (2012) The Comparative Advantages of fsQCA and Regression Analysis for Moderately Large-N Analysis. Sociological Methods & Research 41(1): 168198.
Volkwein, JF Tandberg, D (2008) Measuring Up: Examining the Connections Among State Structural Characteristics, Regulatory Practices, and Performance. Research in Higher Education 49(2): 180197.
Willemse, N De Beer, P (2012) Three Worlds of Educational Welfare States? A Comparative Study of Higher Education Systems Across Welfare States. Journal of European Social Policy 22(2): 105117.
Williams, R, de Rassenfosse, G, Jensen, P Marginson, S (2013) The Determinants of Quality National Higher Education Systems. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 35(6): 599611.
Winter-Ebmer, R Wirz, A (2002) Public Funding and Enrolment into Higher Education in Europe. IZA Discussion Papers 503. Berlin: Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
Woodside, K (1983) The Political Economy of Policy Instruments: Tax Expenditures and Subsidies. In Atkinson MM and Chandler MA (eds.), The Politics of Canadian Public Policy. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press, 173197.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Public Policy
  • ISSN: 0143-814X
  • EISSN: 1469-7815
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-public-policy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Capano et al. supplementary material
Capano et al. supplementary material 1

 Word (78 KB)
78 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed