Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-11T20:20:58.863Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Do Institutions Make a Difference? Financing Systems of Labor Market Policy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Günther Schmid  and
Bernd Reissert
Günther Schmid
Affiliation:
Labour Market and Employment, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin
Bernd Reissert
Affiliation:
Labour Market and Employment, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In recent years the hopes of finding a solution for the puzzle of mass unemployment shifted to labor market institutions such as the system of regulation and industrial relations. The following study takes up a much neglected aspect of labor market institutions, the issue of financing labor market policy. After developing the analytical framework, the systems of financing labor market policy in six countries are briefly described. Next are analyzed the effects of different financing systems on expenditures for active labor market policy – as an essential element in fighting unemployment. Financial systems, however, influence not only the level but also the structure of labor market policy which in turn has implications for its allocational and distributional effects. Finally, some lessons are drawn from the international comparison, the main thesis is illustrated by the German case. Institutional incongruity, i.e. a mismatch between organizational structures and functions, may have two effects, leading political decision makers to behave in a generally unexpected way, and channelling the effects of political programmes in unintended directions.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Public Policy , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , April 1988 , pp. 125 - 149
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bosch, G. (1986). Perspektiven der Finanzierung der Arbeitsmarktpolitik, in Bieback, K.-J. ed., Die Sozialversicherung und ihre Finanzierung, Frankfurt and New York: Campus, 320–348.Google Scholar
Bruche, G. (1984a). Die Finanzierung der Arbeitsmarktpolitik: Frankreich, Discussion Paper IIM/LMP 84–21b, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin.Google Scholar
Bruche, G. (1984b). Die Finanzierung der Arbeitsmarktpolitik: Österreich, Discussion Paper IIM/LMP 84–21d, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin.Google Scholar
Bruche, G./Reissert, B. (1985). Die Finanzierung der Arbeitsmarktpolitik: System, Effektivität, Reformansätze, Frankfurt and New York: Campus.Google Scholar
Cameron, D. R. (1984). Social Democracy, Corporatism, Labor Quiescence, and the Representation of Economic Interest in Advcanced Capitalist Society, in Goldthorpe, J. H. ed., Order and Conflict in Contemporary Capitalism, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 143–178.Google Scholar
Clark, K. B., and Summers, L. H. (1982). Unemployment Insurance and Labor Market Transitions, in Baily, M. N. ed., Workers, Jobs, and Inflation, Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, 279–323.Google Scholar
Commons, J. R. (1959; 1st edn., 1934). Institutional Economics. Its Place in Political Economy, Madison.Google Scholar
Disney, R. (1984). The Regional Impact of Unemployment Insurance in the United Kingdom, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 46, 241–254.Google Scholar
Fürst, D. (1982). Budgetpolitik, in Hesse, J. J. ed., Politikwissenschaft und Verwaltungswissenschaft. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, Special Issue 13, 414–430.Google Scholar
Hibbs, D. A. (1977). Political Parties and Macroeconomic Policy, American Political Science Review, 1467–1487.Google Scholar
Hamermesh, D. S. (1979). Entitlement Effects, Unemployment Insurance and Employment Decisions, Economic Inquiry 17, 317–332.Google Scholar
Kühl, J. (1987). Wirkungsanalyse der Arbeitsmarktpolitik, in: Bombach, G. et al. eds., Arbeitsmärkte und Beschäftigung, Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr, 355–383.Google Scholar
Lane, J.-E. (1987). Balancing Theory and Data in Comparative Politics, European Political Data Newsletter, 62, 4–28.Google Scholar
Lange, P. and Garrett, G. (1985). The Politics of Growth: Strategic Interaction and Economic Performance in the Advanced Industrial Democracies, 1974–1980, Journal of Politics, 47, 792–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luhmann, N. (1964). Funktionen und Folgen formaler Organisation, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
Offe, C. (1972) Klassenherrschaft und politisches System – Die Selektivität politischer Institutionen, in C. Offe, Strukturprobleme des kapitalistichen Staates. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 65–105.Google Scholar
Reissert, B. (1985). Die Finanzierung der Arbeitsmarktpolitik: Groβbritannien, Discussion Paper IIM/LMP 84–21C, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin.Google Scholar
Reissert, B. (1986). Kommunales Hebesatzrecht zur Einkommensteuer, in Demokratische Gemeinde, Special Issue (Kommunale Finanzen in der Krise – Beiträge zur Neuordnung des Gemeindefinanzsystems), 40–45.Google Scholar
Rose, R. (1987). The Political Appraisal of Employment Policies, Journal of Public Policy, 7, 283–303.Google Scholar
Scharpf, F. W. (1983). Zur Bedeutung institutioneller Forchungsansätze, in Scharpf, F. W. and Brockmann, M., eds., Institutionelle Bedingungen der Arbeitsmarkt – und Beschäftigungspolitik, Frankfurt and New York: Campus, 9–20.Google Scholar
Scharpf, F. W. (1984) Plädoyer für ein kommunales Hebesatzrecht bei der Einkommensteuer, in Demokratische Gemeinde, 8, 36–37.Google Scholar
Scharpf, F. W. (1987a). A Game-Theoretical Interpretation of Inflation and Unemployment in Western Europe, Journal of Public Policy, 7, 227–257.Google Scholar
Scharpf, F. W. (1987b). Grenzen der institutionellen Reform, in Ellwein, T. et al. eds., Jahrbuch zur Staats – und Verwaltungswissenschaft, Vol. 1, Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlag, 111–151.Google Scholar
Scharpf, F. W. (1987c). Sozialdemokratische Krisenpolitik in Europa, Frankfurt and New York: Campus.Google Scholar
Schmid, G. (1984). Die Finanzierung der Arbeitsmarktpolitik: Schweden, Discussion Paper 11M/LMP 84–21a, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin.Google Scholar
Schmid, G. (1986). Steuer-oder Beitragsfinanzierung der Arbeitsmarktpolitik?, Wirtschaftsdienst, 66, 141–147.Google Scholar
Schmid, G. (1987). Zur politisch-institutionellen Theorie des Arbeitsmarkts. Die Rolle der Arbeitsmarktpolitik bei der Wiederherstellung der Vollbeschäftigung, Politische Vierteljahresschrift 28, 133–161.Google Scholar
Schmid, G. (1988). Labor Market Policy in Transition, Trends and Effectiveness in the Federal Republic of Germany, Stockholm: EFA-Report No. 17.Google Scholar
Schmid, G., Reissert, B. and Bruche, G. (1987). Arbeitslosenversicherung und aktive Arbeitsmarktpolitik. Finanzierungssysteme im intemationalen Vergleich, Berlin: Edition Sigma.Google Scholar
Schmidt, M. G. (1982). Does Corporatism Matter? Economic Crisis, Politics and Rates of Unemployment in Capitalist Democracies in the 1970s, in: Lehmbruch, G. and Schmitter, P., eds, Patterns of Corporatist Policy-Making, London: Sage Publications, 237–258.Google Scholar
Schmidt, M. G. (1986). Politische Bedingungen erfolgreicher Wirtschaftspolitik – Einevergleichende Analyse westlicher Industrieländer, Journal für Sozialforschung, 26, 251–273.Google Scholar
Sharpe, L. J. and Newton, K. (1984). Does Politics Matter? The Determinants of Public Policy, Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Therborn, G. (1986). Why Some Peoples Are More Unemployed Than Others. The Strange Paradox of Growth and Unemployment, London: Verso.Google Scholar
Therborn, G. (1987). Does Corporatism Really Matter? The Economic Crisis and Issues of Political Theory, Journal of Public Policy, 7, 257–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webber, D. (1987). Eine Wende in der deutschen Arbeitsmarktpolitik? Sozial-liberale und christlich-liberale Antworten auf die Beschäftigungskrise, in: Adomeit, H. and Blanke, B. eds., Arbeitsmarkt, Arbeitsbcziehungen und Politik in den 80er Jahren, Leviathan, Special Issue 8, 74–85.Google Scholar
WZB (Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung) (1980ff): Internationale Chronik zur Arbeitsmarktpolitik, Berlin.Google Scholar