Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Business as usual: interest group access and representation across policy-making venues

  • Frederick J. Boehmke (a1), Sean Gailmard (a2) and John W. Patty (a3)

Abstract

We provide the first comprehensive study of lobbying across venues by studying interest group registrations in both the legislative and administrative branches. We present four major findings based on Federal and state data. Firstly, groups engage in substantial administrative lobbying relative to legislative lobbying. Secondly, the vast majority of groups lobby the legislature, but a large proportion of groups also lobby the bureaucracy. Thirdly, representational biases in legislative lobbying are replicated across venues: business groups dominate administrative lobbying at least as much as they do legislative lobbying. Finally, the level of interest group activity in one venue for a given policy area is strongly related to its level in the other venue. The findings potentially have important implications for the impact of institutional design on both the form and promotion of broad participation in policy-making as well as the ultimate content of policies chosen by democratic governments, broadly construed.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Frederick J. Boehmke Associate Professor Department of Political Science University of Iowa 341 Schaeffer Hall Iowa City, IA 52242 USA Email: frederick-boehmke@uiowa.edu
Sean Gailmard Associate Professor Travers Department of Political Science University of California, Berkeley 734 Barrows Hall Berkeley, California 94720 USA Email: gailmard@berkeley.edu
John W. Patty Associate Professor Department of Political Science Washington University Campus Box 1063 1 Brookings Drive St. Louis, MO 63130 USA Email: jpatty@wustl.edu

References

Hide All
Abney, G. (1988) Lobbying by the Insiders: Parallels of State Agencies and Interest Groups. Public Administration Review 48(5): 911917.
Ainsworth, S. (1993) Regulating Lobbyists and Interest Group Influence. Journal of Politics 55(1): 4156.
Ainsworth, S.Sened, I. (1993) The Role of Lobbyists: Entrepreneurs with Two Audiences. American Journal of Political Science 37(3): 834866.
Austen-Smith, D. (1993) Information and Influence: Lobbying for Agendas and Votes. American Journal of Political Science 37(3): 799833.
Austen-Smith, D.Wright, J. R. (1992) Competitive Lobbying for a Legislator's Vote. Social Choice and Welfare 9(3): 229257.
Austen-Smith, D.Wright, J. R. (1994) Counteractive Lobbying. American Journal of Political Science 38(1): 2544.
Austen-Smith, D.Wright, J. R. (1996) Theory and Evidence for Counteractive Lobbying. American Journal of Political Science 40(2): 543564.
Baumgartner, F. R.Leech, B. L. (1998) Basic Interests: The Importance of Groups in Politics and in Political Science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Baumgartner, F. R.Leech, B. L. (1999) Studying Interest Groups Using Lobbying Disclosure Reports. VOX POP, Newsletter of the Political Organizations and Parties Section of APSA 17(3): 13.
Baumgartner, F. R.Leech, B. L. (2001) Interest Niches and Policy Bandwagons: Patterns of Interest Group Involvement in National Politics. Journal of Politics 63(4): 11911213.
Baumgartner, F. R., Berry, J. M., Hojnacki, M., Kimball, D. C.Leech, B. L. (2009) Lobbying and Policy Change: Who Wins, Who Loses, and Why. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Beckmann, M. N. (2008) The President's Playbook: White House Strategies for Lobbying Congress. The Journal of Politics 70(2): 407419.
Bendor, J.Meirowitz, A. (2004) Spatial Models of Delegation. American Political Science Review 98(2): 293310.
Bennedsen, M.Feldmann, S. E. (2006) Lobbying Bureaucrats. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 108(4): 643668.
Boehmke, F., Gailmard, S.Patty, J. W. (2006) Whose Ear to Bend? Information Sources and Venue Choice in Policy Making. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 1(2): 139169.
Caldeira, G. A.Wright, J. R. (1988) Organized Interests and Agenda Setting in the US Supreme Court. The American Political Science Review 82(4): 11091127.
Caldeira, G. A., Hojnacki, M.Wright, J. R. (2000) The Lobbying Activities of Organized Interests in Federal Judicial Nominations. Journal of Politics 62(1): 5169.
Demir, T.Nyhan, R. C. (2008) The Politics–Administration Dichotomy: An Empirical Search for Correspondence between Theory and Practice. Public Administration Review 68(1): 8196.
Furlong, S. R. (1997) Interest Group Influence on Rule Making. Administration & Society 29(3): 325347.
Furlong, S. R. (1999) The Lobbying Disclosure Act and Interest Group Lobbying Data: Two Steps Forward and One Step Back. VOX POP, Newsletter of the Political Organizations and Parties Section of APSA 17(3): 46.
Furlong, S. R.Kerwin, C. M. (2005) Interest Group Participation in Rulemaking: A Decade of Change. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15(3): 353370.
Gailmard, S.Patty, J. W. (2013) Formal Models of Bureaucracy. Annual Review of Political Science 15: 353377.
Golden, M. M. (1998) Interest Groups in the Rule-Making Process: Who Participates? Whose Voices Get Heard? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 8(2): 245270.
Gray, V.Lowery, D. (1996) The Population Ecology of Interest Representation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Greene, S.Heberlig, E. S. (2002) Finding the Weak Link: The Choice of Institutional Venues by Interest Groups. The American Review of Politics 23: 1938.
Griffith, E. S. (1939) The Impasse of Democracy. New York, NY: Harrison-Hilton.
Hansen, J. M. (1991) Gaining Access: Congress and the Farm Lobby, 1919–1981. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Heclo, H. (1978) Issue Networks and the Executive Establishment. In The New American Political Enterprise, ed. Anthony King. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
Heinz, J. P., Laumann, E. O., Nelson, R. L.Salisbury, R. H. (1993) The Hollow Core: Private Interests in National Policy Making. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hojnacki, M., Kimball, D. C., Baumgartner, F. R., Berry, J. M.Leech, B. L. (2012) Studying Organizational Advocacy and Influence: Reexamining Interest Group Research. Annual Review of Political Science 15(1): 379399.
Holyoke, T. T. (2003) Choosing Battlegrounds: Interest Group Lobbying across Multiple Venues. Political Research Quarterly 56(3): 325336.
Kerwin, C. M. (2003) Rulemaking, 3rd ed. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.
Kollman, K. (1997) Inviting Friends to Lobby: Interest Groups, Ideological Bias, and Congressional Committees. American Journal of Political Science 41(2): 519544.
Kollman, K. (1998) Outside Lobbying. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Laffont, J.Tirole, J. (1993) A Theory of Incentives in Procurement and Regulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Leech, B. L., Baumgartner, F. R., La Pira, T.Semanko, N. A. (2005) Drawing Lobbyists to Washington: Government Activity and the Demand for Advocacy. Political Research Quarterly 58(1): 1930.
Lohmann, S. (1993) A Signaling Model of Informative and Manipulative Political Action. American Political Science Review 88(2): 319333.
Lohmann, S. (1995a) Information, Access, and Contributions: A Signaling Model of Lobbying. Public Choice 85(3): 267284.
Lohmann, S. (1995b) A Signaling Model of Competitive Political Pressures. Economics & Politics 7(3): 181206.
Lohmann, S. (1998) An Information Rationale for the Power of Special Interests. American Political Science Review 92(4): 809827.
Lowery, D., Gray, V., Fellowes, M.Anderson, J. (2004) Living in the Moment: Lags, Leads, and the Link Between Legislative Agendas and Interest Advocacy. Social Science Quarterly 85(2): 463477.
Lowi, T. J. (1969) The End of Liberalism: Ideology, Policy, and the Crisis of Public Authority. New York, NY: WW Norton & Company.
McCubbins, M.Schwartz, T. (1984) Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols versus Fire Alarms. American Journal of Political Science 28(1): 165179.
McKay, A. M. (2011) The Decision to Lobby Bureaucrats. Public Choice 147(1): 123138.
McKay, A.Yackee, S. W. (2007) Interest Group Competition on Federal Agency Rules. American Politics Research 35(3): 336357.
Miller, G. J. (2005) The Political Evolution of Principal-Agent Models. Annual Review of Political Science 8: 203225.
Mosher, F. C. (1982) Democracy and the Public Service, 2 ed.New York: Oxford University Press.
Olson, M. (1965) The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Riccucci, N. (1995) Unsung Heroes: Federal Execucrats Making a Difference. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
Rosenbloom, D. H.Piotrowski, S. J. (2005) The Legal-Institutional Framework for Interest Group Participation in Federal Administrative Policymaking. In The Interest Group Connection: Electioneering, Lobbying, and Policymaking in Washington, ed. Paul S. Herrnson, Ronald G. Shaiko Clyde Wilcox. 2 ed.Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press, pp. 258281.
Rourke, F. E. (1976) Bureaucracy, Politics, and Public Policy, 2 ed. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
Schattschneider, E. E. (1960) The Semisovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Schlozman, K. L. (1984) What Accent the Heavenly Chorus? Political Equality and the American Pressure System. The Journal of Politics 46(4): 10061032.
Sloof, R. (1998) Game-Theoretic Models of the Political Influence of Interest Groups. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Sloof, R. (2000) Interest Group Lobbying and the Delegation of Policy Authority. Economics and Politics 12(3): 247274.
Spiller, P. T. (1990) Politicians, Interest Groups, and Regulators: A Multiple-Principals Agency Theory of Regulation, or “Let Them Be Bribed”. Journal of Law & Economics 33(1): 65.
Stewart, R. B. (1975) Reformation of American Administrative Law, The Harvard Law Review 88(8): 16671813.
Truman, D. B. (1951) The Governmental Process. New York: Knopf.
Walker, J. L. Jr (1991) Mobilizing interest groups in America: Patrons, professions, and social movements. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Wilson, W. (1887) The Study of Administration. Political Science Quarterly 2: 197222.
Yackee, J. W.Yackee, S. W. (2006) A Bias towards Business? Assessing Interest Group Influence on the US Bureaucracy. Journal of Politics 68(1): 128139.

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed