Skip to main content Accessibility help

The American Legislative Process as a Signal

  • Robert A. Katzmann (a1)


The signals of the American legislative process cannot be understood simply by focusing on the formal and technical processes of legislative drafting. Rather, it is important to appreciate the political and institutional dynamics which affect how and to whom signals are sent, and why some signals emerging from the legislative process are clearer than others. Legislative policymaking often does not conform to the textbook ideal of deliberation and clarity. By the way that legislation is drafted, through the use of legislative history and various materials, legislators send signals to agencies, courts, their colleagues and interest groups. How bills are drafted - tight or loose - gives institutions more or less authority to make policy. Accounting for the sometimes absence of clear direction in legislation in the American system, and the consequences of that absence for agencies and courts, raises questions in a comparative context about how the structure of government affects the signals of the legislative process.



Hide All
Ackermann, Bruce A., AND HasslerWilliam, T. William, T. (1981). Clean Coal Dirty Air. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Atiyah, Patrick S. (1988). ‘Judicial-Legislative Relations in England’ in Katzmann, R. A., cd.,Judges and Legislators: Toward Institutional Comity. Washington, D.C.: Brookings, 129–61.
Brest, Paul (1980). ‘The Misconceived Quest for the Original UnderstandingBoston University Law Review, 60, 221–24.
Chayes, Abram (1976). ‘The Role of the Judge in Public Law Litigation’, Harvard Law Review, 89, 1281.
Coffin, Frank M. (1988). ‘The Federalist Number 86: On Relations between the Judiciary and Congress’, in Katzmann, R. A., ed., Judges and Legislators: Toward Institutional Comity. Washington, D.C.: Brookings, 2130.
Davidson, Roger, H. (1981). ‘Subcommittee Government: New Channels for Policy Making’ in Mann, T. E. and Ornstein, N. J., eds., The New Congress. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute, 99133.
Easterbrook, Frank, H. (1984). ‘The Supreme Court 1983 Term - Foreword: The Court and the Economic System’, 98, 4.
Epstein, Richard (1985), Takings: Private Property and the Constitution. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Eskridge, William N. Jr. , and Frickey, Philip P. (1987). ‘Legislation Scholarship and Pedagogy in the Post-Legal Process Era’, University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 48, 691.
Fenno, Richard, F. (1973). Congressmen in Committees. Boston: Little, Brown.
Fisher, Louis (1988). Constitutional Dialogues: Interpretation as a Political Process. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Fiss, Owen (1979). ‘Foreword: The Forms of Justice’, Harvard Law Review, 93, I.
Godamer, Hans-Georg (1982). Truth and Method. N.Y.: Crossroad Publishing.
Hart, Jr., Henry, M. and Sacks, Albert (1958). The Legal Process: Basic Problems in the Making and Application of Law. Cambridge: Harvard Law School.
Henschen, Beth (1983). ‘Statutory Interpretations of the Supreme Court: Congressional Response’, American Politics Quarterly, II, 441–57.
Horowitz, Donald L. (1977). Courts and Social Policy. Washington, D.C.: Brookings.
Jones, Charles O. (1982). The United States Congress: People, Place ad Policy. Homewood, Illinois: Dorsey Press.
Kastenmeier, Robert W., AND Remington, Michael J. (1988). ‘A Judicious Legislator's Lexicon to the Federal Judiciary’, in Katzmann, R., ed., Judges and Legislators: Toward Institutional Comiy. Washington. D.C.: Brookings.
Katzmann, Robert A. (1986). Institutional Disability: The Saga of Transportation Polity for the Disabled. Washington, D.C.: Brookings.
Katzmann, Robert A. ed. (1988). judges and Legislators: Toward Institutional Comity. Washington, D.C.: Brookings.
Kingdon, John W. (1984). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston: Little, Brown.
Malbin, Michael J. (1979). Unelected Representatives: Congressional Staff and the Future of Repersentative Government. N.Y.: Basic Books.
Melnick, R. Shep. (1985). ‘The Politics of Partnership’, Public Administration Review, 45, 653–60.
Menard, Alfred (1954). ‘Legislative Bill Drafting’, Rocky Mountain Law Review, 26, 368384.
Michelman, Frank (1986). ‘The Supreme Court 1985 Term - Foreword: Traces of Self-Government’, Harvard Law Review, 100, 4.
MikvaAbner, J. Abner, J. (1987). ‘Reading and Writing Statutes’, University of Pittsburg Law Review, 48, 627.
Muir, William K. J. (1982). Legislature: California's School for Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Murphy, Walter, F. (1962). Congress and the Court: A Case Study in the American Political Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Oleszek, Walter, J. (1984). Congressional Procedures and the Policy Process. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press.
Olson, Jr., Mancur, (1965). The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Posner, Richard A. (1985). The Federal Courts: Crisis and Reform. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Price, David E. (1972). Who Makes the Laws? Creativity and Power in Senate Committees. Schenkman Publishing Co.
Rose, Richard (1984). Understanding Big Government: The Programme Approach. London & Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
Shapiro, Martin M. (1986). Courts: A Comparative Political Perspective. Chicago. University of Chicago Press.
Shapiro, Martin, M. (1988). Who Guards the Guardians: Judicial Control of Administration. Georgia: University of Georgia Press.
Smith, Steven S. and Deering, Christopher J. (1984). Committees in Congress. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press.
Starr, Kenneth (1987). ‘Judicial Review of Administrative Action in a Conservative Era’, Administrative Law Review, 39, 363.
Stumpf, Harry (1965). ‘Congressional Response to Supreme Court Rulings: The Interaction of Law and Politics’, Journal of Public Law, 377.
Sunstein, Cass (1986). ‘Legal Interference with Private Preferences’, University of Chicago Law Review, 53, 1129.
Van, Mechelen, Denis, , and Rose, Richard (1986). Patterns of Parliamentary Legislation. Aldershot, Hants. Gower Publishing Company.
Weisberg, Robert (1983). ‘The Calabresian Judicial Artists: Statutes and the New Legal Process’, Stanford Law Review 35, 213.
Wildaysky, Aaron, Speaking Truth to Power: The Art and Craft of Policy Analysis, 1979. Boston: Little, Brown.

The American Legislative Process as a Signal

  • Robert A. Katzmann (a1)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed