Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Torsional magnetic reconnection: The effects of localizing the non-ideal (ηJ) term

  • PETER F. WYPER (a1) and REKHA JAIN (a1)

Abstract

Magnetic reconnection in three dimensions (3D) is a natural extension from X-point reconnection in two dimensions. Of central importance in the 3D process is a localized non-ideal region within which the plasma and magnetic field decouple allowing for field line connectivity change. In practice, localized current structures provide this localization; however, mathematically a similar effect can be achieved with the localization of plasma resistivity instead. Physically though, such approaches are unrealistic, as anomalous resistivity requires very localized currents. Therefore, we wish to know how much information is lost in localizing η instead of current? In this work we develop kinematic models for torsional spine and fan reconnection using both localized η and localized current and compare the non-ideal flows predicted by each. We find that the flow characteristics are dictated almost exclusively by the form taken for the current profile with η acting only to scale the flow. We do, however, note that the reconnection mechanism is the same in each case. Therefore, from an understanding point of view, localized η models are still important first steps into exploring the role of non-ideal effects.

Copyright

References

Hide All
[1]Pontin, D. I. and Priest, E. R. 2009 Three-dimensional null point reconnection regimes. Phys. Plasmas 16, 122101.
[2]Priest, E. R. and Titov, V. S. 1996 Magnetic reconnection at three-dimensional null points. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lon. A 354, 29512992.
[3]Hesse, M. and Schindler, K. 1988 A theoretical foundation of general magnetic reconnection. J. Geophys. Res. 93, 55595567.
[4]Pontin, D. I., Bhattacharjee, A. and Galsgaard, K. 2007 Current sheet formation and non-ideal behavior at three-dimensional magnetic null points. Phys. Plasmas 14 052106.
[5]Pontin, D. I. and Galsgaard, K. 2007 Current amplification and magnetic reconnection at a three-dimensional null point: Physical characteristics. J. Geophys. Res. 112, 3103.
[6]Priest, E. and Forbes, T. 2000 Magnetic Reconnection. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
[7]Gunnar, H. and Priest, E.Evolution of magnetic flux in an isolated reconnection process. Phys. Plasmas 10, 27122721
[8]Pontin, D. I., Hornig, G. and Priest, E. R. 2004 Kinematic reconnection at a magnetic null point: Spine-aligned current. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 98, 407428.
[9]Pontin, D. I., Hornig, G. and Priest, E. R. 2005 Kinematic reconnection at a magnetic null point: Fan-aligned current. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 99, 7793.
[10]Wyper, P. F. and Jain, R. 2010 Torsional magnetic reconnection at 3D null points: A phenomenological study. Phys. Plasmas. 17, 092902.
MathJax
MathJax is a JavaScript display engine for mathematics. For more information see http://www.mathjax.org.

Torsional magnetic reconnection: The effects of localizing the non-ideal (ηJ) term

  • PETER F. WYPER (a1) and REKHA JAIN (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed