Skip to main content Accessibility help

Theoretical analysis of the ICRH antenna's impedance matching for ELMy plasmas on EAST

  • DAN DU (a1), XUEYU GONG (a2), ZHENHUA WANG (a2), JUN YU (a1) and PINGWEI ZHENG (a3)...


A well-optimized design of an ion cyclotron resonance heating (ICRH) antenna is very important for steady-state plasma heating with high radio frequency (RF) power of several tens of megawatts. However, a sharp decrease in the coupling RF power because of impedance mismatch of ICRH system is an issue that must be resolved for present-day fusion reactors and International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor. This paper has theoretically analyzed the ICRH antenna's impedance matching for ELMy plasmas on experimental advanced superconducting tokamak (EAST) by the transmission line theory. The results indicate that judicious choice of the optimal feeder location is found useful for adjustable capacitors' tolerance to the variations of the antenna input impedance during edge-localized mode (ELM) discharge, which is expected to be good for the design of ICRH antenna system and for real-time feedback control during ELM discharge on EAST.



Hide All
[1]Messiaen, al. 2006 Nucl. Fusion 46, S514S539.
[2]Pinsker, R. I. 1998 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 40, A215A229.
[3]Noterdaeme, J. al. 2005 Fusion Eng. Des. 74, 191198.
[4]Lin, Y., Binus, A. and Wukitch, S. J. 2009 Fusion Eng. Des. 84, 3337.
[5]Faugel, al. 2005 Proceedings of the 23rd symposium of fusion technology, Venice, Italy, Fusion Eng. Des. 74, 319324.
[6]Argouarcha, al. 2009 Fusion Eng. Des. 84, 275278.
[7]Monakhov, al. 2005 Fusion Eng. Des. 74, 467471.
[8]Qin, Ch. al. 2007 17th topical conference on radio frequency power in plasmas, Florida, USA, AIP Conf. Proc. 933, 183186.
[9]Kumazawa, al. 2008 Nucl. Fusion 48, 115002.
[10]Wan, B. al. 2009 Nucl. Fusion 49, 104011.
[11]Du, al. 2011 Contrib. Plasma Phys. 51, 754759.
[12]Bhatnagar, V. al. 1982 Nucl. Fusion 22, 280288.
[13]Messiaen, al. 2009 Nucl. Fusion 49, 055004.
[14]Messiaen, al. 1989 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 31, 921939.
[15]Parisot, al. 2004 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 46, 17811792.
MathJax is a JavaScript display engine for mathematics. For more information see


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed