Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T23:17:50.114Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Plasma models of the topside ionosphere and electrostatic wave propagation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2009

M. T. C. Fang
Affiliation:
Imperial College, University of London
M. K. Andrews
Affiliation:
Imperial College, University of London

Abstract

The circumstances under which certain plasma dispersion equations may be used in electrostatic ray tracing problems connected with studies of ionospheric topside plasma resonances are investigated. Three plasma ‘models’ of increasing complexity are compared with each other. The models are based on the assumption of: (i) an adiabatic process with a scalar pressure, (ii) a fully adiabatic process (Buneman 1961), and (iii) an electrostatic kinetic description. It is found that near fN, and within 10° of the static magnetic field, all three models may be used with good accuracy, and collisionless damping is very small. Near fT, and for propagation nearly across the field, only the second model (ii) gives tolerably accurate results as judged by the kinetic equation. For frequencies within 10 kc s-1 of fT such as are encountered in ray tracing, collisionless damping may be neglected within a cone of ∽ 10° about the perpendicular to the field for fT < 2fH, and within ∽ 20° whenfT ≫ 2fH Model (iii) may be used to examine the dispersion equation near the electron gyroharmonics: this topic is discussed in Andrews & Fang (1971).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andrews, M. K. & Fang, M. T. C. 1971 J. Plasma Phys. 6, 579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aubry, M. P., Bitoun, J. & Graff, PH. 1970 Radio Science, 5, 635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buneman, O. 1961 Phys. Fluids, 4, 669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvert, W. & McAfee, J. R. 1969 Proc. IEEE, 57, 1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fried, R. D. & Conte, S. D. 1961 The Plasma Dispersion Function. Academic.Google Scholar
Ginzburg, V. C. 1964 The Propagation of Electromagnetic Waves in Plasma. Pergamon.Google Scholar
McAfee, J. R. 1968 J. Geophys. Res. 73, 5577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAfee, J. R. 1969 a J. Geophys. Res. 74, 802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAfee, J. B. 1969 b J. Geophys. Res. 74, 6403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seshadri, S. R. 1964 Radio Sci. J. Res. NBS 68 D (12), 1285.Google Scholar
Sitenko, A. G. & Stepanov, K. N. 1957 Sov. Phys. JETP, 4, 512.Google Scholar
Stix, T. H. 1962 Theory of Plasma Waves. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Thomas, J.O. & Landmark, B. J. (eds.) 1969 Plasma Waves in Space and Laboratory, vol. 1 Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar