Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T02:08:25.330Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dynamics of Alfvén waves in partially ionized astrophysical plasmas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2009

DASTGEER SHAIKH
DASTGEER SHAIKH*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Center for Space Physics and Aeronomic Research (CSPAR), University of Alabama at Huntsville, Huntsville, AL 35805, USA (dastgeer.shaikh@uah.edu, das0007@uah.edu)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We develop a two dimensional, self-consistent, compressible fluid model to study evolution of Alfvenic modes in partially ionized astrophysical and space plasmas. The partially ionized plasma consists mainly of electrons, ions and significant neutral atoms. The nonlinear interactions amongst these species take place predominantly through direct collision or charge exchange processes. Our model uniquely describe the interaction processes between two distinctly evolving fluids. In our model, the electrons and ions are described by a single-fluid compressible magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) model and are coupled self-consistently to the neutral fluid via compressible hydrodynamic equations. Both plasma and neutral fluids are treated with different energy equations that adequately enable us to monitor non-adiabatic and thermal energy exchange processes between these two distinct fluids. Based on our self-consistent model, we find that the propagation speed of Alfvenic modes in space and astrophysical plasma is slowed down because these waves are damped predominantly due to direct collisions with the neutral atoms. Consequently, energy transfer takes place between plasma and neutral fluids. We describe the mode coupling processes that lead to the energy transfer between the plasma and neutral and corresponding spectral features.

Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Plasma Physics , Volume 76 , Special Issue 3-4: In Honor of Professor Padma Kant Shukla on the Occasion of His 60th Birthday , August 2010 , pp. 305 - 315
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Balsara, D. 1996 ApJ. 465, 775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fite, W. L., Smith, A. C. H. and Stebbings, R. F. 1962 Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 268, 527.Google Scholar
Gigliotti, A., Gekelman, W., Pribyl, P., Vincena, S., Karavaev, A., Shao, X., Sharma, A. and Papadopoulos, D. 2009 Phys. Plasmas 16, 092106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gekelman, W. 2004 J. Geophys. Res. 109, A01311.Google Scholar
Groebner, R. J. et al. 2001 Nuclear Fusion 41, 1789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulsrud, R. and Pearce, 1969 ApJ. 156, 445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leake, J., Arber, T. D. and Khodachenko, M. L. 2005 Astronom. Astrophys. 442, 1091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oishi, J. S. and Mac Low, M. 2006 ApJ. 638, 281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padoan, P., Zweibel, E. and Nordlund, A. 2000 ApJ. 540, 332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauls, H. L., Zank, G. P. and Williams, L. L. 1995 J. Geophys. Res. A11, 21595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaikh, D., Eliasson, B. and Shukla, P. K. 2009 Phys. Rev. E 79 (6), 066404.Google Scholar
Shaikh, D. and Shukla, P. K. 2008 AIP Conf. Proc. 1061, 66–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaikh, D. and Shukla, P. K. 2009a Nonlinear Process. Geophys. 16 (2), 189–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaikh, D. and Shukla, P. K. 2009b Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (4), 045004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaikh, D. and Shukla, P. K. 2009c J. Plasma Phy. 75 (01), 133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaikh, D. and Zank, G. P. 2006 Astrophys. J. 640 (2), L195–L198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaikh, D. and Zank, G. P. 2008 Astrophys. J. 688 (1), 683–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, R., Rogister, A. and Kaw, P. 2004 Phys. Plasmas 11, 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shukla, P. K., Eliasson, B., Kourakis, I. and Stenflo, L. 2006 J. Plasma Phys. 72, 397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shukla, P. K. and Stenflo, L. 2000 J. Plasma Phys. 64, 353.Google Scholar
Zank, G. P. 1999 Space Sci. Rev. 89, 413–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar