Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T04:43:07.929Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cranial morphology and systematics of an extraordinary sample of the Late Neogene dwarf tapir, Tapirus polkensis (Olsen)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Richard C. Hulbert Jr. ,
Steven C. Wallace ,
Walter E. Klippel  and
Paul W. Parmalee
Richard C. Hulbert Jr.
Affiliation:
Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville 32611-7800,
Steven C. Wallace
Affiliation:
Don Sundquist Center of Excellence in Paleontology, Department of Geosciences, East Tennessee State University, Box 70357, Johnson City 37614,
Walter E. Klippel
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville 37996
Paul W. Parmalee
Affiliation:
Frank H. McClung Museum, University of Tennessee, Knoxville 37996
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The previously poorly known “Tapiravus” polkensis Olsen, 1960 (Mammalia, Perissodactyla, Tapiridae) is now known from abundant, well preserved specimens from both the type area in central Florida and from the Gray Fossil Site (GFS) in eastern Tennessee. The latter has produced over 75 individuals, the greatest number of tapirids from a single fossil site, including many articulated skeletons. Almost all linear measurements taken on skulls, mandibles, and cheek teeth from GFS have coefficients of variation less than 10 (most between 3 and 7), indicating the presence of a single species. However, the sample reveals considerable intraspecific variation for a few key morphologic features, including development of the sagittal crest, outline shape of the nasals, and number and relative strength of lingual cusps on the P1. The Florida sample of T. polkensis is more limited, but has the same state as the GFS sample for all preserved characters of systematic significance, and while the Florida teeth are on average smaller (especially narrower lower cheek teeth), they fall either within or just below the observed range of the Gray Fossil Site population. The new material supports a reassignment of “Tapiravus” polkensis to the genus Tapirus, and demonstrates that the geologic age of the species is significantly younger than previously thought, Hemphillian rather than Barstovian. Tapirus polkensis is the smallest known North American Tapirus, and smaller than any of the extant species in the genus, with an estimated average mass of 125 kg.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 83 , Issue 2 , March 2009 , pp. 238 - 262
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benson, R. N. 1998. Radiolarians and diatoms from the Pollack Farm Site, Delaware: marine-terrestrial correlation of Miocene vertebrate assemblages of the middle Atlantic Coastal Plain, pp. 5–19. In Benson, R. N. (ed.), Geology and Paleontology of the Lower Miocene Pollack Farm Fossil Site, Delaware. Delaware Geological Survey Special Publication 21.Google Scholar
Boeuf, O. 1991. Tapirus jeanpiveteaui nov. sp., nouvelle espèce de Tapiridae (Perissodactyla) du Pliocène de Charente (France). Palaeontographica, Abteilung A, 217:177–194.Google Scholar
Colbert, M. W. 2005. The facial skeleton of the early Oligocene Colodon (Perissodactyla, Tapiroidea). Paleontologica Electronica, 8:12A <http://palaeo-electronica.org/2005_l/colbert12/issue1_05.html>.Google Scholar
Colbert, M. W. and Schoch, R. M. 1998. Tapiroidea and other moropomorphs, pp. 569–582. In Janis, C. M., Scott, K. S., and Jacobs, L. L. (eds.), Evolution of Tertiary Mammals of North America, Volume 1: Terrestrial Carnivores, Ungulates, and Ungulatelike Mammals. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cook, H. J. 1927. A new rhinoceros of the genus Teleoceras from Colorado. Proceedings of the Colorado Museum of Natural History, 7:1–5.Google Scholar
Croizet, J.-B. and Jobert, A. C. G. 1828. Reserches sur les Ossements Fossiles du Department du Puy-de-Dôme. Paris, 224 p.Google Scholar
Desantis, L. R. G. and Wallace, S. C. 2008. Neogene forest refugium from the Appalachians of Tennessee, USA: Geochemical evidence from fossil mammal teeth. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 266:59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desmarest, A. G. 1819. Tapirs fossiles, pp. 458–461. In Nouveau Dictionnaire d'Histoire Naturelle (ed.), Nouvelle Edition. Chez Deterville, Paris, vol. 32.Google Scholar
Fejar, O. 1964. The lower-Villafranchian vertebrates from Hajnáōka near Filákovo in southern Slovakia. Ústrední Ústav Geologický, Praha, 116 pp.Google Scholar
Ferrero, B. S. and Noriega, J. I. 2007. A new upper Pleistocene tapir from Argentina: remarks on the phylogenetics and diversification of Neotropical Tapiridae. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 27:504–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Florida Geological Survey. 1959. Known active mineral producers of Florida 1956-1957. Biennial Report, Florida Geological Survey, 13:70–84.Google Scholar
Frick, C. 1921. Extinct vertebrate faunas of the badlands of Bautista Creek and San Timoteo Cañon, southern California. University of California Publications, Bulletin of the Department of Geology, 12:277–424.Google Scholar
Frick, C. 1926. The Hemicyoninae and an American Tertiary bear. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 56:1–119.Google Scholar
Gazin, C. L. and Collins, R. L. 1950. Remains of land mammals from the Miocene of the Chesapeake Bay Region. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 116(2): 1–21.Google Scholar
Gill, T. N. 1865. Description of the genus Elasmognathus . Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences Philadelphia, 17:183.Google Scholar
Guérin, C. and Eisenmann, V. 1994. Les tapirs (Mammalia, Perissodactyla) du Miocène supérieur d'Europe occidentale. Geobios, 27:113–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatcher, J. B. 1894. A median horned rhinoceros from the Loup Fork Beds of Nebraska. American Geologist, 13:149–150.Google Scholar
Hershkovitz, P. 1954. Mammals of northern Colombia, preliminary report no. 7: tapirs (genus Tapirus), with a systematic review of American species. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 103:465–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holbrook, L. T. 2002. The unusual development of the sagittal crest in the Brazilian tapir (Tapirus terrestris). Journal of Zoology, London, 256:215–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooijer, D. A. 1947. On fossil and prehistoric remains of Tapirus from Java, Sumatra, and China. Zoologische Mededeelingen Museum Leiden, 27:253–299.Google Scholar
Huang, W. and Qiren, F. 1991. Wushan Homind Site. China Ocean Press, Beijing, 205 p. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
Hulbert, R. C. 1995. The giant tapir, Tapirus haysii, from Leisey Shell Pit 1A and other Florida Irvingtonian localities. Bulletin of the Florida Museum of Natural History, 37:515–551.Google Scholar
Hulbert, R. C. 1999. Nine million years of Tapirus (Mammalia, Perissodactyla) from Florida. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 19(3, supplement):53A.Google Scholar
Hulbert, R. C. 2005. Late Miocene Tapirus (Mammalia, Perissodactyla) from Florida, with description of a new species, Tapirus webbi . Bulletin of the Florida Museum of Natural History, 45:465–494.Google Scholar
Hulbert, R. C., MacFadden, B. J., and Waldrop, J. S. 2001. Perissodactyla, pp. 280–306. In Hulbert, R. C. (ed.), The Fossil Vertebrates of Florida. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
Hulbert, R. C. and Wallace, S. C. 2005. Phylogenetic analysis of late Cenozoic Tapirus (Mammalia, Perissodactyla). Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 25(3, supplement):72A.Google Scholar
Janis, C. M. 1990. Correlation of cranial and dental variables with body size in ungulates and macropodids, pp. 255–291. In Damuth, J. and MacFadden, B. J. (eds.), Body Size in Mammalian Paleobiology, Estimation and Biological Implications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Jefferson, G. T. 1989. Late Cenozoic tapirs (Mammalia: Perissodactyla) of western North America. Los Angeles County Museum Contributions in Science, Number 406, 21 p.Google Scholar
Kaup, J. J. 1833. Description d'ossements fossils de Mammifères inconnus jusqu'à présent, qui se trouvent au Muséum grand-ducal de Darmstadt. 2ème cahier (Chalicotherium, Tapir, Porcs, Carnivores). Darmstadt, 31 pp.Google Scholar
Kretzoi, M. 1951. The Hipparion-fauna von Csakvar. Földtany Közlöny, 81: 402–417.Google Scholar
Leidy, J. 1859. Descriptions of vertebrate fossils, pp. 99–122. In Holmes, F. S. (ed.), Post-Pleiocene Fossils of South Carolina. Russell and Jones, Charleston.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. 1758. Systema naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus differentiis, synonymis, locis. Tenth Edition. Laurentii Salvii, Stockholm, 824 p.Google Scholar
Lundelius, E. L. and Slaughter, B. H. 1976. Notes on American Pleistocene tapirs, pp. 226–243. In Churcher, C. S. (ed.), Athlon: Essays in Paleobiology in Honour of Loris Shano Russell. Royal Ontario Museum, Toronto.Google Scholar
Marsh, O. C. 1871. Description of Lophiodon validus . Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, 23:9–10.Google Scholar
Marsh, O. C. 1877. Notice of some new vertebrate fossils. American Journal of Science, series 3, 14:249–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, H. T. 1928. Two new carnivores from the Pliocene of Kansas. Journal of Mammalogy, 9:233–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthew, W. D. and Granger, W. 1923. New fossil mammals from the Pliocene of Szechuan, China. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 48:563–598.Google Scholar
Merriam, J. C. 1911. Tertiary mammal beds of Virgin Valley and Thousand Creek in northwestern Nevada. University of California Publications, Bulletin of the Department of Geological Sciences, 6:199–304.Google Scholar
Merriam, J. C. 1913. Tapir remains from late Cenozoic beds of the Pacific coast region. University of California Publications, Bulletin of the Department of Geology, 7:169–175.Google Scholar
Olsen, S. J. 1959. Fossil mammals of Florida. Florida Geological Survey Special Publication Number 6, 75 p.Google Scholar
Olsen, S. J. 1960. Age and faunal relationships of Tapiravus remains from Florida. Journal of Paleontology, 34:164–167.Google Scholar
Owen, R. 1870. On fossil remains of mammals found in China. Journal of the Geological Society of London, 26:417–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padilla, M. and Dowler, R. C. 1994. Tapirus terrestris. Mammalian Species, Number 481, 8 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parmalee, P. W., Klippel, W. E., Meylan, P. A., and Holman, J. A. 2002. A Late Miocene-early Pliocene population of Trachemys (Testudines: Emydidae) from East Tennessee. Annals of the Carnegie Museum of Natural History, 71:233–239.Google Scholar
Ray, C. and Sanders, A. E. 1984. Pleistocene tapirs in the eastern United States, pp. 283–315. In Genoways, H. H. and Dawson, M. R. (eds.), Contributions in Quaternary Vertebrate Paleontology: A Volume in Memorial to John E. Guilday. Carnegie Museum of Natural History, Pittsburgh, Special Publication 8.Google Scholar
Robertson, J. S. 1976. Latest Pliocene mammals from Haile XVA, Alachua County, Florida. Bulletin of the Florida State Museum, 20:111–186.Google Scholar
Roulin, X. 1829. Memoir pour servir a l'histoire du tapir; et description dune espece nouvelle appartenant aux hautes regions de la Cordillere des Andes. Annales des Sciences Naturelle Zoologie Paris, 17:26–55.Google Scholar
Rustioni, M. 1992. On Pliocene tapirs from France and Italy. Bollettino della Societá Paleontologica Italiana, 31:269–294.Google Scholar
Savage, D. E. and Russell, D. E. 1983. Mammalian Paleofaunas of the World. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 432 p.Google Scholar
Schlaikjer, E. M. 1937. A new tapir from the lower Miocene of Wyoming. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoölogy, 80:231–251.Google Scholar
Schoch, R. M. 1984. The type specimens of Tapiravus validus and ?Tapiravus rarus (Mammalia, Perissodactyla), with a review of the genus, and a new report of Miotapirus (Miotapirus marslandensis Schoch and Prins, new species) from Nebraska. Postilla, Number 195, 12 p.Google Scholar
Schubert, B. W. and Wallace, S. C. 2006. Amphibians and reptiles of the Mio-Pliocene Gray Fossil Site and their paleoecologic implications. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 26(supplement to 3:122A.Google Scholar
Schultz, C. B., Martin, L. D., and Corner, R. G. 1975. Middle and late Cenozoic tapirs from Nebraska. Bulletin of the Nebraska State Museum, 10:1–21.Google Scholar
Scott, K. M. 1990. Postcranial dimensions of ungulates as predictors of body size, pp. 301–335. In Damuth, J. and MacFadden, B. J. (eds.), Body Size in Mammalian Paleobiology, Estimation and Biological Implications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Sellards, E. H. 1916. Fossil vertebrates from Florida: a new Miocene fauna; new Pliocene species; the Pleistocene fauna. Annual Report, Florida Geological Survey, 8:77–119.Google Scholar
Sellards, E. H. 1918. The skull of a Pleistocene tapir including description of a new species and a note on the associated fauna and flora. Annual Report, Florida Geological Survey, 10:57–70.Google Scholar
Simpson, G. G. 1945. Notes on Pleistocene and Recent tapirs. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 86:33–82.Google Scholar
Shunk, A., Driese, S. G., and Clark, G. M. 2006. Latest Miocene to earliest Pliocene sedimentation and climate record derived from paleosinkhole fill deposits, Gray Fossil Site, northeastern Tennessee, U.S.A. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 231:265–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spassov, N. and Ginsburg, L. 1999. Tapirus balkanicus nov. sp., nouveau tapir (Perissodactyla, Mammalia) du Turolien de Bulgarie. Annales de Paléontologie, 85:265–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sugarman, P. J., Miller, K. G., Owens, J. P., and Feigenson, M. D. 1993. Strontium-isotope and sequence stratigraphy of the Miocene Kirkwood Formation, southern New Jersey. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 105: 423–436.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tedford, R. H. and Hunter, M. E. 1984. Miocene marine-nonmarine correlations, Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plains, North America. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 47:126–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tedford, R. H., Albright, L. B., Barnosky, A. D., Ferrusquila-Villafranca, I., Hunt, R. M., Storer, J. E., Swisher, C. C., Voorhies, M. R., Webb, S. D., and Whistler, D. P. 2004. Mammalian biochronology of the Arikareean through Hemphillian interval (late Oligocene through earliest Pliocene epochs) in North America, pp. 169–231, In Woodburne, M. O. (ed.), Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic Mammals of North America: Biostratigraphy and Geochronology. New York, Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tong, H. 2004. Tapiridae, pp. 233–250. In Zheng, S. (ed.), Jianshi Hominid Site. Science Press, Beijing. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
Tong, H. 2005. Dental characters of the Quaternary tapirs in China, their significance in classification and phylogenetic assessment. Geobios, 38: 139–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tong, H., Liu, J., and Han, L. 2002. On fossil remains of early Pleistocene tapir (Perissodactyla, Mammalia) from Fanchang, Anhui. Chinese Science Bulletin, 47:586–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, S. C. and Hulbert, R. C. 2005. Morphology and systematics of the Hemphillian (Miocene) Gray Fossil Site tapir. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 25(3, supplement): 127A.Google Scholar
Wallace, S. C., Nave, J., and Burdick, K. 2002. Preliminary report on the recently discovered Gray Fossil Site (Miocene), Washington Co., Tennessee: with comments on observed paleopathologies - the advantages of a large sample. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 22(3, supplement): 117A.Google Scholar
Wallace, S. C. and Wang, X. 2004. Two new carnivores from an unusual late Tertiary forest biota in eastern North America. Nature, 431:556–559.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Webb, S. D. 1969. The Pliocene Canidae of Florida. Bulletin of the Florida State Museum, 14:273–308.Google Scholar
Webb, S. D. 1973. Pliocene pronghorns of Florida. Journal of Mammalogy, 54:203–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, S. D. 2000. Evolutionary history of New World Cervidae, pp. 38–64. In Vrba, E. and Schaller, G. (eds.), Antelopes, Deer, and Relatives: Fossil Record Behavioral Ecology, Systematics and Conservation. Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
Webb, S. D. and Hulbert, R. C. 1986. Systematics and evolution of Pseudhipparion (Mammalia, Equidae) from the Late Neogene of the Gulf Coastal Plain and the Great Plains, pp. 237–272. In Flanagan, K. M. and Lillegraven, J. A. (eds.), Vertebrates, Phylogeny, and Philosophy. University of Wyoming Contributions to Geology, Special Paper 3.Google Scholar
Webb, S. D., Hulbert, R. C., Morgan, G. S., and Evans, H. F. 2008. Terrestrial mammals of the Palmetto Fauna (early Pliocene, latest Hemphillian) from the Central Florida Phosphate District, pp. 293–312. In Wang, X. and Barnes, L. G. (eds.), Geology and Vertebrate Paleontology of Western and Southern North America, Contributions in Honor of David P. Whistler. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County Science Series, Number 41.Google Scholar
Webb, S. D. and Tessman, N. 1968. A Pliocene vertebrate fauna from low elevation in Manatee County, Florida. American Journal of Science, 266: 777–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, T. E. 1942. Additions to the fauna of the Florida phosphates. Proceedings of the New England Zoology Club, 21:87–91.Google Scholar
Yarnell, K. L. 1980. Systematics of late Miocene Tapiridae (Mammalia, Perissodactyla) from Florida and Nebraska. Unpublished M.S. thesis, University of Florida, Gainesville, 125 p.Google Scholar