Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T07:32:56.055Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

When Do Collision Regulations Begin to Apply?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 June 2008

Jinsong Zhao*
Affiliation:
Shanghai Jiao Tong University)

Abstract

The fundamental approaches for preventing collisions at sea are based on interpreting and understanding the Collision Regulations correctly. Although the Regulations are the technical standards of collision avoidance conduct at sea, they are also the code for dividing liability1. When one tries to apportion the collision liability between two parties, the first question faced is whether the Rules apply and if so, when do they apply? In order to answer this question, this paper has reviewed most of the English, American and Canadian cases in the past hundred plus years, which are related to this topic and outlined briefly four special circumstances where collision avoidance rules do not apply, even if there is a risk of collision.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Buzek, F. J. and Holdert, H. M. C. (1990). Collision Cases — Judgements and Diagram, 2nd ed.Lloyd's of London Press Ltd.Google Scholar
2. Cahill, R. A. (1983). Collisions and Their Causes. Fairplay Publications.Google Scholar
3. Cockcroft, A. N. and Lameijer, J. N. F. (1996). A Guide to the Collision Avoidance Rules, 5th ed. Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd.Google Scholar
4. Gault, G. (1998). Marsden on Collision at Sea, 12th ed. Sweet & Maxwell.Google Scholar
5. Griffin, J. W. (1949). The American Law of Collision. Edwards Brothers, Inc.Google Scholar
6. Lord Hailsham of St. Marylebone (1983). Halsbury's Law of England, vol.43, 4th ed.Butterworths.Google Scholar
7. Harley, S. T. (1977). Overtaking or crossing, Safety at Sea International, August.Google Scholar
8. Llana, C. B. and Wisneskey, G. P. (1991). Handbook of the Nautical Rules of the Road, 2nd ed., p.79. The United States Naval Institute.Google Scholar
9. Ludes, F. J. and Gilbert, H. J. (1967). Corpus Juris Secundum, A Complete restatement of the Entire American Law, vol. 15. The American Law Book Co.Google Scholar
10. McGuffie, K. C. (1961). Marsden: The Law of Collisions at Sea, 11th ed.Stevens and Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
11. Mukherjee, P. K. (1992). Overtaking or crossing: judicial interpretation and the mariner's dilemma. The Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce, 23 (2), 247262, April.Google Scholar
12. Si, Y. and, Wu, Z. (1995). The Law of Ship Collision, 2nd ed.Dalian Maritime University Press (in Chinese).Google Scholar
13. Smith, R. A. (1993). Farwell's Rules of the Nautical Road, 7th ed.Naval Institute Press.Google Scholar
14. Sturt, R. H. B. (1991). The Collision Regulations, 3rd ed.Lloyd's of London Press Ltd.Google Scholar
15. Zhao, J., et al. (1996a). The Collision Regulations and Cases. Dalian Maritime University Press (in Chinese).Google Scholar
16. Zhao, J., et al. (1996b). The legal interpretation of keeping course and speed. Maritime Collision and Prevention, 1, pp. 235259. Chiavari Publications.Google Scholar
17. Zhao, J. and Xia, G. (1993). A Mariner's Guide to the Collision Regulations. Dalian Maritime University Press (in Chinese).Google Scholar