Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T01:17:10.799Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Weighted RAIM for APV: The Ideal Protection Level

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 November 2010

Carl D. Milner  and
Washington Y. Ochieng
Carl D. Milner
Affiliation:
(Imperial College London)
Washington Y. Ochieng*
Affiliation:
(Imperial College London)
*
(Email: w.ochieng@imperial.ac.uk)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

International standards require the use of a weighted least-squares approach to onboard Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring (RAIM). However, the protection levels developed to determine if the conditions exist to perform a measurement check (i.e. failure detection) are not specified. Various methods for the computation of protection levels exist. However, they are essentially approximations to the complex problem of computing the worst-case missed detection probability under a weighted system. In this paper, a novel approach to determine this probability at the worst-case measurement bias is presented. The missed detection probabilities are then iteratively solved against the integrity risk requirement in order to derive an optimal protection level for the operation. It is shown that the new method improves availability by more than 30% compared to the baseline weighted RAIM algorithm.

A version of this paper was first presented at the US Institute of Navigation (ION) GNSS 2009 Conference in Savannah, Georgia.

Keywords

Integrity MonitoringProtection LevelGNSS
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 64 , Issue 1 , January 2011 , pp. 61 - 73
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Angus, J. E. (2007) RAIM with Multiple Faults. NAVIGATION, Journal of the Institute of Navigation. 52, 4.Google Scholar
Brown, and Chin, GPS (1998) “Calculation of GPS Threshold and Protection Radius Using Chi Square Methods – A Geometric Approach” ION Red Books.Google Scholar
Hwang, P., Brown, R. G. (2005) RAIM FDE Revisited: A New Breakthrough In Availability Performance With NIORAIM (Novel Integrity Optimized RAIM). ION NTM 2005 San Diego CA.Google Scholar
ICAO SARPs (2006) Annex 10 – Standards and Recommended Practices.Google Scholar
Johnson, and Kotz, (1995) “Continuous Univariate Distributions” 2nd Edition Wiley InterScience.Google Scholar
Lee, Y. C. (2007) Two New RAIM Methods Based on the Optimally Weighted Average Solution (OWAS) Concept. NAVIGATION. Journal of the Institute of Navigation. 54, 4, 333–345.Google Scholar
Milner, C. and Ochieng, W. Y. (2009) A Fast And Efficient Integrity Computation For Non-Precision Approach Performance Assessment, GPS Solutions (In Press) http://www.springerlink.com/content/f758457j7x524120/.Google Scholar
Milner, C. (2009) Determination of the Effects of GPS Failures on Aviation Applications, PhD thesis, University of London (subject to final submission).Google Scholar
Ober, P. B. (1998) RAIM Performance: How Algorithms Differ. The Proceedings of the 11th International Technical Meeting of The Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation, ION GPS-98, September 15–18, 1998, Nashville, Tennessee.Google Scholar
Ober, P. B. (2003) Integrity Monitoring and Prediction. PhD Thesis. TU Delft.Google Scholar
Ochieng, W. Y., Sauer, K., Walsh, D., Brodin, G., Griffin, S. and Denney, M. (2003) GPS Integrity and Potential Impact on Aviation Safety. The Journal of Navigation, 56, 51–65.Google Scholar
RTCA DO-229D (2006) Minimum Operational Performance Standards for GPS/WAAS Airborne Equipment.Google Scholar
Sturza, M (1988) “Navigation System Integrity Monitoring Using Redundant Measurements”.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walter, T and Enge, P., (1995) “Weighted RAIM for Precision Approach” ION NTM 1995.Google Scholar