Skip to main content Accessibility help

A Revisit of the Definition of the Ship Domain based on AIS Analysis

  • Axel Hörteborn (a1), Jonas W. Ringsberg (a2), Martin Svanberg (a1) and Henrik Holm (a3)


When ships approach each other, they should keep a minimum area around them clear of other vessels in order to remain safe. The geometrical shape of this area has been studied since the early 1970s and is defined as the ship domain. The progress in computer capacity since then and the introduction of the Automatic Identification System (AIS) provides the potential to further investigate the size and the governing factors of the domain. This investigation revisits and proposes a method using data based on 600,000 ship encounters at 36 locations. It is concluded that the ship domain has the shape of an ellipse with half axis radii of 0.9 and 0.45 nautical miles. However, there are two factors that greatly affect the ship domain: how large the area is that is used to gather vessel intersections and whether they are constrained by water depth. In contradiction to some previous research, it is found that the ship domain is unrelated to the length of the ship.


Corresponding author


Hide All
Chang, S.-J., Hsiao, D.-T. and Wang, W.-C. (2014). AIS-based delineation and interpretation of ship domain models. OCEANS 2014-TAIPEI, IEEE, 16.
Coldwell, T. (1983). Marine traffic behaviour in restricted waters. The Journal of Navigation, 36, 430444.
Copping, A., Breithaupt, S., Whiting, J., Grear, M., Tagestad, J. and Shelton, G. (2016). Likelihood of a marine vessel accident from wind energy development in the Atlantic. Wind Energy, 19(9), 15571566. doi: 10.1002/we.1935.
Fujii, Y. (1983). Integrated study on marine traffic accidents. IABSE Colloquium on Ship Collision with Bridges and Offshore Structures, Copenhagen, 9198.
Fujii, Y. and Tanaka, K. (1971). Traffic capacity. The Journal of Navigation, 24, 543552.
Goodwin, E. M. (1975). A statistical study of ship domains. The Journal of Navigation, 28, 328344.
Gucma, L. and Marcjan, K. (2012). Examination of ships passing distances distribution in the coastal waters in order to build a ship probabilistic domain. Zeszyty Naukowe/Akademia Morska w Szczecinie, 3440.
Hansen, M. G., Jensen, T. K., Lehn-Schiøler, T., Melchild, K., Rasmussen, F. M. and Ennemark, F. (2013). Empirical ship domain based on AIS data. The Journal of Navigation, 66, 931940.
Hollnagel, E. 2014. Safety-I and safety–II: the past and future of safety management, Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.
International Maritime Organization. (IMO) (1972). Convention on the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea.
Jensen, T. K., Hansen, M. G., Lehn-Schiøler, T., Melchild, K., Rasmussen, F. M. and Ennemark, F. 2013. Free Flow–Efficiency of a One-way Traffic Lane between two Pylons. The Journal of Navigation, 66, 941951.
Jingsong, Z., Zhaolin, W. and Fengchen, W. 1993. Comments on ship domains. The Journal of Navigation, 46, 422436.
Larsen, O. D. (1993). Ship collision with bridges: The interaction between vessel traffic and bridge structures, IABSE.
Pearson, K. (1895). Note on Regression and Inheritance in the Case of Two Parents. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 58, 240242.
Pietrzykowski, Z. and Magaj, J. (2016). Ship domains in Traffic Separation Schemes. Zeszyty Naukowe Akademii Morskiej w Szczecinie, 143149. doi: 10.17402/098.
Pietrzykowski, Z. and Magaj, J. (2017). Ship Domain as a Safety Criterion in a Precautionary Area of Traffic Separation Scheme. TransNav, the International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, 11(1), 9398. doi: 10.12716/1001.11.01.10.
Pietrzykowski, Z. and Uriasz, J. (2009). The ship domain–a criterion of navigational safety assessment in an open sea area. The Journal of Navigation, 62, 93108.
Przywarty, M., Gucma, L., Marcjan, K. and Bak, A. (2015). Risk Analysis Of Collision Between Passenger Ferry And Chemical Tanker In The Western Zone Of The Baltic Sea. Polish Maritime Research, 22(2), 38. doi: 10.1515/pomr-2015-0011.
Raymond, E. S. (2014). AIVDM/AIVDO protocol decoding. GPSD documentation Version, 1.
Robards, M., Silber, G., Adams, J., Arroyo, J., Lorenzini, D., Schwehr, K. and Amos, J. (2016). Conservation science and policy applications of the marine vessel Automatic Identification System (AIS)—a review. Bulletin of Marine Science, 92, 75103.
Szlapczynski, R. and Szlapczynska, J. (2017). Review of ship safety domains: Models and applications. Ocean Engineering, 145, 277289.
Silveira, P., Teixeira, A. and Soares, C. G. (2013). Use of AIS data to characterise marine traffic patterns and ship collision risk off the coast of Portugal. The Journal of Navigation, 66, 879.
Zhang, S.-K., Liu, Z.-J., Cai, Y., Wu, Z.-L. and Shi, G.-Y. (2016a). AIS trajectories simplification and threshold determination. The Journal of Navigation, 69, 729744.
Zhang, W., Goerlandt, F., Kujala, P. and Wang, Y. (2016b). An advanced method for detecting possible near miss ship collisions from AIS data. Ocean Engineering, 124, 141156.


A Revisit of the Definition of the Ship Domain based on AIS Analysis

  • Axel Hörteborn (a1), Jonas W. Ringsberg (a2), Martin Svanberg (a1) and Henrik Holm (a3)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed