Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-fnpn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-31T22:29:47.316Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

GPS and DGPS as a Challenge for Environmentally-Friendly Agriculture*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2009

Hermann Auernhammer
Affiliation:
(Freising-Weihenstephan)
Thomas Muhr
Affiliation:
(Freising-Weihenstephan)
Markus Demmel
Affiliation:
(Freising-Weihenstephan)

Abstract

For farming in the future, positional information is of particular importance. Out of a multitude of positioning systems, GPS/DGPS is the most suitable one. This system does not require any additional infrastructure and at the same time guarantees complete coverage of all tilled surfaces. The major application of positioning with GPS/DGPS is to be seen in the area of local information and documentation. By generating both planning and process data, it facilitates the operation and control of work processes (organic and mineral fertilization, plant protection). In the end, positioning leads to navigation, which, in the case of single vehicles and vehicle pools, will in turn provide completely new possibilities for development and application. For the first time, vehicles without drivers are conceivable. Thus, the completion of any kind of work on schedule, without time limitations, would become possible with the least possible stress for soil and environment.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Auernhammer, H. (ed.) (1994). GPS in agriculture. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 11, 12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auernhammer, H., Demmel, M., Muhr, T., Rottmeier, J. and Wild, K. (1994). Site-specific yield measurement in combines and forage harvesting machines. In AGENG M1LAN0’ 94. Proceedings of the International Conference on Agricultural Engineering, Milano, 29–1 September 1994, part 2, pp. 698/699, report no. 94-d-139.Google Scholar
Auernhammer, H., Demmel, M. and Muhr, T. (1994). GPS and DGPS as a challenge for environment-friendly agriculture. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Land Vehicle Navigation, Dresden. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Ortung und Navigation e.v., The German Institute of Navigation, Düsseldorf.Google Scholar
Auernhammer, H.,Demmel, M., Muhr, T., Rottmeier, J. and Wild, K. (1993). Yield measurement on combine harvesters. ASAE paper no. 93–1506. St Joseph.Google Scholar
Auernhammer, H., Demmel, M., Muhr, T., Rottmeier, J. and Perger, P. (1993). Ortung und Ertragsermittlung in den Erntejahren 1991 und 1992. Zeitschrift für Agrarinformatik, 1 (1), 2629.Google Scholar
Auernhammer, H. and Demmel, M. (1993). Lokale Ertragsermittlung beim Mähdrusch. Landtechnik, 48(6), 315319.Google Scholar
Auernhammer, H. and Muhr, T. (1991). GPS in a basic role for environment protection in agriculture. Proceedings of the 1991 Symposium – Automated Agriculture in the 2lst Century, paper no. 11-91, pp. 494502. ASAE Publications, St Joseph.Google Scholar
Auernhammer, H. and Muhr, T. (1991). The use of GPS in agriculture for yield mapping and tractor implement guidance. Proceedings of DGPS’91 – first International Symposium on Real-Time Applications of the Global Positioning System, vol. II, pp. 445465. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Ortung und Navigation e.v., The German Institute of Navigation, Düsseldorf.Google Scholar
Auernhammer, H., Demmel, M., Rottmeier, J. and Muhr, T. (1991). Future developments for fertilizing in Germany. ASAE paper no. 91–1040. St Joseph.Google Scholar
MacLeod, F. (1991). Agricultural vehicle positioning and its integration with a large-scale land information system. This Journal, 44, 30.Google Scholar
Palmer, R. J. (1989). Precise navigation, guidance and control services within the agricultural community. This Journal, 42, 1.Google Scholar
Rober, P. C, Rust, R. H. and Larson, W. E. (1992). Soil-specific Crop Management. American Society of Agronomy Inc., Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Schnug, E., Haneklaus, S. and Lamp, J. (1990). Economic and ecological optimization of farm chemical application by ‘computer aided farming (CAF)’. Technical abstracts and poster abstracts in International Conference on Agricultural Engineering (AG ENG’90), pp. 161–162. Berlin, VDI-AGR/MEG.Google Scholar
Schueller, J. K. (1992). A review and integrating analysis of spatially-variable control of crop production. Fertilizer Research, 33, 134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schueller, J. K. et al. (1987). Determination of spatially variability yield maps. ASAE paper no. 87-1533. St Joseph.Google Scholar
Searcy, S. W., Schueller, J. K., Bae, H. Y. and Stout, B. A. (1990). Measurement of field location using microwave frequency triangulation. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 4, 209223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stafford, J. V. and Miller, P. C. H. (1993). Spatially-selective application of herbicide to cereal crops. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 9, 217229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stafford, J. V., Ambler, B. and Smith, M. P. (1991). Sensing and mapping grain yield variation. Proceedings of the 1991 Symposium – Automated Agriculture in the 21st Century, paper no. 11–91, pp. 356366. ASAE Publications, St Joseph.Google Scholar
Vansichen, R. and De Baerdemaeker, J. (1991). Continuous wheat yield measurement on a combine. Proceedings of the 1991 Symposium – Automated Agriculture in the 21st Century, paper no. 11–91, pp. 346355. ASAE Publications, St Joseph.Google Scholar
VDI (Coordinator, Auernhammer, H.) (1992). Ortung und Navigation landwirtschaftlicher Fahrzeuge. VDI-Gesellschaft Agrartechnik (VDI-AGR), 14. Düsseldorf.Google Scholar