Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T15:25:11.080Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Analysis of Airspace Infringements Over Complex Airspace in Europe and the United States of America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2020

Elena Psyllou Open the ORCID record for Elena Psyllou [Opens in a new window]  and
Arnab Majumdar
Elena Psyllou
Affiliation:
(Lloyds Register Foundation Transport Risk Management Centre, Centre for Transport studies, Imperial College London)
Arnab Majumdar*
Affiliation:
(Lloyds Register Foundation Transport Risk Management Centre, Centre for Transport studies, Imperial College London)
*
(E-mail: a.majumdar@imperial.ac.uk)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The increase in the number of commercial flights highlights the need for air traffic to follow air procedures. Unfortunately, general aviation aircraft used for recreational purposes keep entering controlled and restricted airspace without obtaining permission from air traffic services. Given the safety and operational problems this could potentially cause, this paper examines the underlying reasons for these incidents occurring. In particular, it analyses airspace infringements between 2008 and 2017 involving general aviation flights that were recorded in airspace in which a large number of commercial flights also fly in Europe and America. The reports were analysed based on an initial assessment of their quality. Information was latent in the narrative and subsequently both qualitative (content analysis) and quantitative methods (descriptive statistics) of analysis were used. The analysis revealed that airspace infringements were related to the pilot's flight planning, that is, flight-route choice, navigation skills and communication, in addition to requirement to adhere to airspace procedure. The findings could be used by national authorities and flying clubs to promote safe flying in these regions.

Keywords

AviationGeneral AviationAirspace InfringementAirspace Design
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 73 , Issue 5 , September 2020 , pp. 1036 - 1051
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Burns, K. and Bonaceto, C. (2020). An empirically benchmarked human reliability analysis of general aviation. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 194, 106227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coyle, A. and Lyons, E. (2007). Analysing Qualitative Data in Psychology. SAGE Publications. Available from: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/imperial/detail.action?docID=783505.Google Scholar
Dupuy, M. (2012). Framework for the Analysis of Separation-Related Incidents in Aviation. University of London and Imperial College London.Google Scholar
Elliott, R., Fischer, C. T. and Rennie, D. L. (1999). Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38(3), 215–229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
EUROCONTROL (2018). Network Operations Report 2017 Main Report.Google Scholar
European Air Traffic Management (2007a). Airspace Infringement Initiative Risk Analysis Part I, Safety Analysis of Airspace Infringements in Europe. 1.2 Edition. EUROCONTROL.Google Scholar
European Air Traffic Management (2007b). Airspace Infringement Risk Analysis Part II General Aviation Airspace Infringement Survey, Analysis of Pilot-reported Causal Factors and Prevention Measures. 1.2 Edition. EUROCONTROL.Google Scholar
European Air Traffic Management (2008). Airspace Infringement Risk Analysis Part III, Case Study Switzerland. 1 Edition. EUROCONTROL.Google Scholar
General Aviation Manufacturers Association (2018). 2017 Annual Report.Google Scholar
General Aviation Safety Committee (2016). Fly On Track. Available from: http://flyontrack.co.uk/statistics/ [Accessed 05/06 2016].Google Scholar
Hajek, D. (2017). If Trump is Travelling and a Pilot Strays, Fighter Jets Will Follow. Available from: www.npr.org/2017/03/31/518861719/if-trump-is-traveling-and-a-pilot-strays-fighter-jets-will-follow?t=1532696938483 [Accessed 27/07/2018].Google Scholar
International Civil Aviation Organization (2001). Air Traffic Services, Annex?11 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation. International Civil Aviation Organization.Google Scholar
Kyriakidis, M., Pak, K. T. and Majumdar, A. (2015). Railway accidents caused by human error: historic analysis of UK railways, 1945 to 2012. Transportation Research Record, 2476(1), 126–136. doi: 10.3141/2476-17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NATS (2018) Why Airspace Infringements have the Potential to Impact all of us. Available from: https://www.nats.aero/discover/infringements/ [Accessed 31/05/2018].Google Scholar
Pipino, L. L., Lee, Y. W. and Wang, R. Y. (2002). Data quality assessment. Communications of the ACM, 45(4), 211–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Psyllou, E. and Majumdar, A. (2019). How do general aviation pilots choose their route when flying in complex airspace? The International Journal of Aerospace Psychology. doi: 10.1080/24721840.2019.1596744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Psyllou, E., Majumdar, A. and Ochieng, W. (2018a). Planning of general aviation pilots using interviews. In: Stanton, N.A. (ed.). Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation. AHFE. 2017. Los Angeles, CA, USA: Springer, 48.Google Scholar
Psyllou, E., Majumdar, A. and Ochieng, W. (2018b). A review of navigation involving general aviation pilots flying under visual flight rules. Journal of Navigation, 71(5), 1130–1142. doi: 10.1017/S0373463318000279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shetty, K. and Hansman, J. (2012). Current and Historical Trends in General Aviation in the United States. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT International Centre for Air Transportation.Google Scholar
Wilke, S., Majumdar, A. and Ochieng, W. Y. (2015). Modelling runway incursion severity. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 79, 88–99. doi: //doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.03.016.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed