Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T10:05:43.263Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Implications of the Eysenck-Prell Study of “The Inheritance of Neuroticism”: A Critique

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

Bertram P. Karon  and
David R. Saunders
Bertram P. Karon
Affiliation:
Akron Psychological Consulting Center, Akron, Ohio
David R. Saunders
Affiliation:
Educational Testing Service, Princeton, New Jersey
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Few problems in the whole field of psychopathology are more important than that of aetiology. While it is generally accepted that heredity and environment must interact in some fashion in the causation of most mental disorders, the nature of the roles played by the two classes of determinant is not known. Consequently, any study shedding light on this problem is of primary importance.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 104 , Issue 435 , April 1958 , pp. 350 - 358
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1958 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. BURLINGHAM, Dorothy T., Twins, 1952. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
2. Eysenck, H. J., and Prell, D. B., “The inheritance of neuroticism. An experimental study”, J. Ment. Sci., 1951, 97, 441–465.Google Scholar
3. Idem , “A note on the differentiation of normal and neurotic children”, J. Clin. Psychol., 1952, 8, 202–4.3.0.CO;2-H>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Holzinger, K. J., Reply to special review of “Twins”, Psychol. Bull., 1938, 35, 436–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Kallman, F. J., The Genetics of Schizophrenia, 1938. New York: Augustin, pp. 2–3.Google Scholar
6. Idem, Heredity in Health and Mental Disorder, 1953. New York: Morton.Google Scholar
7. Karpman, B., “Psychodynamics in fraternal twinship reactions”, Psychoanal. Rev., 1953, 40, 243–267.Google Scholar
8. McNemar, Q., Special review: Newman, Freeman and Holzinger's Twins: A Study of Heredity and Environment, Psychol. Bull., 1938, 35, 237–249.Google Scholar
9. Idem , Rejoinder to Holzinger's reply to special review of “Twins”, Psychol. Bull., 1938, 35, 552–554.Google Scholar
10. May, , Joan, , “The assumptions underlying Holzinger's h2 statistic”, J. Ment. Sci., 1951, 97, 466–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Newman, J. H., Freeman, F. N., and Holzinger, K. J., Twins: A Study of Heredity and Environment, 1937. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.