Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T16:43:23.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

II.—English Psychological Literature

On the Weight and Specific Gravity of the Brain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2018

Thomas B. Peacock*
Affiliation:
S. Thomas' Hospital

Extract

“In 1847 (says Dr. Peacock), I published a series of weights of the human brain, collected at the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, together with tables prepared from these observations, together with the much larger number of weights previously recorded by the late Professor John Reid. The observations which follow have been obtained since that time, and though comparatively few in number, yet, as they are not likely to be materially increased and may furnish a useful comparison with the former, I have thought them worthy of being placed on record. The observations on the specific gravity of the brain are entirely new. They were obtained by a different mode from that followed by Dr. Sankey, in his observations of the specific gravity of the healthy brain, and by Dr. Bucknill in his investigation of the density of the brain of insane persons. The former of these observers ascertained the specific gravity of the different portions of the brain, by placing pieces in solution of common salt of different densities; the latter adopted a similar plan, except that he employed solutions of Epsom salts. My own observations were made by first weighing the brain and its several portions in air, and then in distilled water, and calculating the specific gravity by the common formula, viz., as the weight lost by the brain in water is to the weight in air, so is the specific gravity of distilled water (1000) to the weight required.”

Type
Part III.—Quarterly Report on the Progress of Psychological Medicine
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1863 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

* Edinburgh Monthly Journal,’ vol. vii (n. s., vol. i), 1847.Google Scholar

Ibid., 1843.Google Scholar

Some of these have been previously published, but no calculations have been based upon them. (‘London Journal of Medicine,’ vol. i, 1851.)Google Scholar

§ Brit, and For. Med.-Chir. Review,’ vol. xi, 1853, p. 240.Google Scholar

Lancet,’ 1852, vol. ii, p. 588; and ‘Brit, and For. Med.-Chir. Review,’ vol. xv, p. 207.Google Scholar

* See Paper in ‘Edinburgh Monthly Journal,’ vol. vii, 1847.Google Scholar

Wagner's Physiology,’ by Willis, 1844, Appendix, p. 700.Google Scholar

London Journal of Medicine,’ vol. i.Google Scholar

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.