Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

The Study About Cloud of Points Reconstruction with the Framework of Meshfree Method for Viscous Flows

  • Y. D. Wang (a1) (a2) (a3), Y. Jing (a1) (a2), J. Dai (a1) (a2), Q. G. Lin (a1) (a2), X. W. Cai (a4), X. J. Ma (a5), D. F. Ren (a3) and J. J. Tan (a3)...

Abstract

A new method, called Cloud of Points (COP) Reconstruction, is proposed in the present work to extend the meshfree method to simulate viscous flows. With the characters of viscous flows, the anisotropic COP structure is distributed in boundary layer. The proposed method can improve the anisotropic COP structure to isotropic COP structure and reduce the condition number of the least square coefficient matrix for conventional meshfree method. The values of the new reconstructed points are calculated by the Lagrange interpolation. The accuracy and the robustness of the presented meshfree solver are demonstrated on a number of standard test cases, including the functions with analytical gradients and the viscous flows past NACA0012 airfoil. The comparison of the simulation results with the experimental data and other numerical simulation data are also investigated.

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Corresponding author (dlxyjx@mail.njust.edu.cn)

References

Hide All
1. Lucy, L. B., “A Numerical Approach to the Testing of the Fission Hypothesis,” The Astronomical Journal, 82, pp. 10131024 (1977).
2. Liu, G. R., Mesh Free Method: Moving Beyond the Finite Element Method, CRC Press, Boca Raton (2003).
3. Liu, G. R. and Gu, Y. T., An Introduction to Meshfree Methods and Their Programming, Springer, Berlin (2005).
4. Liszka, T. and Orkisz, J., “The Finite Difference Method at Arbitrary Irregular Grids and Its Application in Applied Mechanics,” Computers and Structures, 11, pp. 8395 (1980).
5. Batina, J. T., “A Grid-Free Euler/Navier-Stokes Solution Algorithm for Complex Aircraft Applications,” 31st Aerospace Sciences Meeting, U.S. (1993).
6. Deshpande, S. M., Ghosh, A. K. and Mandal, J. C., “Least Squares Weak Upwind Methods for Euler Equations,” Fluid Mechanics Report, No. FM4, Department of Aerospace Engineering, Indian Institute of Science (1989).
7. Ghosh, A. K. and Deshpande, S. M., “Least Squares Kinetic Method for Inviscid Compressible Flows,” 12th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, U.S. (1995).
8. Dauhoo, M. Z., Ghosh, A. K., Ramesh, V. and Deshpande, S. M., “q-LSKUM-A New Higher-Order Kinetic Upwind Method for Euler Equations Using Entropy Variables,” Computational Fluid Dynamics Journal, 9, pp. 272–77 (2000).
9. Cai, X. W. et al., “Application of Hybrid Cartesian Grid and Gridless Approach to Moving Boundary Flow Problems,” International Journal For Numerical Methods in Fluids, 72, pp. 9941013 (2013).
10. Katz, A. J., “Gridless Methods for Computational Fluid Dynamics,” PH.D. Dissertation, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Stanford University, California, U.S.A. (2009).
11. Morinishi, K., “An Implicit Gridless Type Solver for the Navier-Stokes Equations,” Computational Fluid Dynamics Journal, 9, pp. 551560 (2000).
12. Liu, G. R. and Xu, G. X., “A Gradient Smoothing Method (GSM) for Fluid Dynamics Problems,” International Journal For Numerical Methods In Fluids, 58, pp. 11011133(2008).
13. Yao, J. Y. et al., “A Moving-Mesh Gradient Smoothing Method for Compressible CFD Problems, “ Mathematical Models & Methods in Applied Sciences, 23, pp. 273305 (2013).
14. Munikrishna, N. and Balakrishnan, N.Turbulent Flow Computations on a Hybrid Cartesian Point Distribution Using Meshless Solver LSFD-U,” Computers & Fluids, 40, pp. 118138 (2011).
15. Namvar, M. and Jahangirian, A.An Investigation of Mesh-Less Calculation for Compressible Turbulent Flows,” Computers & Fluids, 86, pp. 483489 (2013).
16. Su, X. R., Yamamoto, S. and Nakahashi, K., “Analysis of a Meshless Solver for High Reynolds Number Flow,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 72, pp. 505527 (2013).
17. Katz, A. and Jameson, A., “Edge-Based Meshless Methods for Compressible Viscous Flow with Applications to Overset Grids,” AIAA paper 2008-3989, AIAA 38th Fluid Dynamics Conference, Seattle, WA, (2008).
18. Kennett, D. J. et al., “An Implicit Meshless Method for Application in Computational Fluid Dynamics,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 71, pp. 10071028 (2013).
19. Sridar, D. and Balakrishnan, N., “An Upwind Finite Difference Scheme for Meshless Solver,” Journal of Computational Physics, 189, pp. 129 (2003).
20. Liou, M. S., “A Sequel to AUSM, Part II : AUSM+-up for all Speeds,” Journal of Computational Physics, 214, pp. 137170 (2006).
21. May, G. and Jameson, A. “Unstructured Algorithm for Inviscid and Viscous Flows Embedded in a Unified Solver Architecture: Flo3xx,” 43rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, U.S. (2005).
22. Jawahar, P. and Hemant, K., “A High-Resolution Procedure for Euler and Navier-Stokes Computations on Unstructured Grids,Journal of Computational Physics, 164, pp. 165203 (2000).
23. Mavriplis, D., Jameson, A. and Martinelli, L., “Multigrid Solution of the Navier-Stokes Equations on Triangular Meshes,” AIAA paper 89-0120, AIAA 27th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NV (1989).
24. Menter, F. R., “Two-Equation Eddy-Viscosity Turbulence Models for Engineering Applications,” AIAA Journal, 32, pp. 269289 (1994).
25. Harris, C. D., “Two-Dimensional Aerodynamic Characteristics of the NACA0012 Airfoil in the Langley 8-foot Transonic Pressure Tunnel,” NASA-TM-81927, NASA Langley Research Center; Hampton, VA, U.S. (1981).

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed