Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Dynamic Analysis and Preliminary Evaluation of a Spring-Loaded Upper Limb Exoskeleton for Resistance Training with Overload Prevention

  • T.-M. Wu (a1) and D.-Z. Chen (a1)

Abstract

Resistance training has been shown to be effective for developing musculoskeletal strength and is recommended by many major health organizations, such as the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. This form of training is available for most populations, including adolescents, healthy adults, the elderly, and the clinical population. Resistance training equipment design relies heavily on the analysis of human movement. Dynamic models of human movement help researchers identify key forces, movements, and movement patterns that should be measured. An at-home resistance training upper limb exoskeleton has been designed with a three-degree-of-freedom shoulder joint and a one-degree-of-freedom elbow joint to allow movement of the upper limb at single and multiple joints in different planes. The exoskeleton can continuously increase the resistance as the spring length changes to train more muscle groups and to reduce the potential risk of muscle injury to the upper limb by free weights and training equipment. The objectives of this research were to develop a dynamic model of the spring-loaded upper limb exoskeleton and to evaluate this model by adopting an appropriate motion analysis system to verify our hypotheses and to determine the optimal configuration of a spring-loaded upper limb exoskeleton for further verification studies.

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Corresponding author (dzchen@ntu.edu.tw)

References

Hide All
1. Kraemer, W. J. and Ratamess, N. A., “Fundamentals of Resistance Training: Progression and Exercise Prescription,” Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 36, pp. 674688 (2004).
2. American College of Sports Medicine, “Position Stand: Progression Models in Resistance Training for Healthy Adults,” Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 34, pp. 364380 (2002).
3. Williams, M. A., Haskell, W. L., Ades, P. A., Amsterdam, E. A., Bittner, V., Franklin, B. A., Gulanick, M., Laing, S. T. and Stewart, K. J., “Resistance Exercise in Individuals with and Without Cardiovascular Disease: 2007 update,” Circulation, 116, pp. 572584 (2007).
4. Taylor, N. F., Dodd, K. J. and Damiano, D. L., “Progressive Resistance Exercise in Physical Therapy: A Summary of Systematic Reiews,” Physical Therapy, 85, pp. 12081223 (2005).
5. Risser, W. L., “Weight-Training Injuries in Children and Adolescents,” American Family Physician, 44, pp. 21042110 (1991).
6. Kerr, Z. Y., Collins, C. L. and Comstock, R. D., “Epidemiology of Weight Training-Related Injuries Presenting to United States Emergency Departments, 1990 to 2007,” The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 38, pp. 765771 (2010).
7. Lavallee, M. E. and Balam, T., “An Overview of Strength Training Injuries: Acute and Chronic,” Current Sports Medicine Report, 9, pp. 307313 (2010).
8. Wu, T. M., Wang, S. Y. and Chen, D. Z., “Design of an Exoskeleton for Strengthening the Upper Limb Muscle for Overextension Injury Prevention,” Mechanism and Machine Theory, 46, pp. 18251839 (2011).
9. Buckley, M. A., Yardley, A., Johnson, G. R. and Carus, D. A., “Dynamics of the Upper Limb During Performance of the Tasks of Everyday Living-A Review of the Current Knowledge Base,” Proceedings of the IMechE, 210, pp. 241247 (1996).
10. Myer, K., Biomedical Engineering and Design Handbook, 2nd Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York pp. 195210 (2009).
11. Hollerbach, J. M. and Flash, T, “Dynamic Interactions Between Limb Segments During Planar Arm Movement,” Biological Cybernetics, 44, pp. 6777 (1982).
12. Nef, T., Mihelj, M. and Riener, R., “ARMin: A Robot for Patient-Cooperative Arm Therapy,” Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, 45, pp. 887900 (2007).
13. Nagarsheth, H. J., Savsani, P. V. and Patel, M. A., “Modeling and Dynamics of Human Arm,” 4th IEEE Conference on Automation Science and Engineering, Washington, pp. 924928 (2008).
14. Apkarian, J., Naumann, S. and Cairns, B., “A Three-Dimensional Kinematic and Dynamic Model of the Lower Limb,” Journal of Biomechanics, 22, pp. 143155 (1989).
15. Requejo, P. S., Wahl, D. P., Bontrager, E. L., Newsam, C. J., Gronley, J. K., Mulroy, S. J. and Perry, J., “Upper Extremity Kinetics During Lofstrand Crutch-Assisted Gait,” Medical Engineering & Physics, 27, pp. 1929 (2005).
16. Thomas, J. S., Corcos, D. M. and Hasan, Z., “Kinematic and Kinetic Constraints on Arm, Trunk, and Leg Segments in Target-Reaching Movement,” Journal of Neurophysiology, 93, pp. 352364 (2005).
17. Shemmell, J., Corcos, D. M. and Hasan, Z., “Kinetic and Kinematic Adaptation to Anisotropic Load,” Experimental Brain Research, 192, pp. 18 (2009).
18. Nagano, A., Yoshioka, S., Komura, T., Himeno, R. and Fukashiro, S., “A Three-Dimensional Linked Segment Model of the Whole Human Body,” International Journal of Sport & Health Science, 3, pp. 311325 (2005).
19. AbdulRahman, S. A., Rambely, A. S. and Ahmad, R. R., “A Biomechanical Model Via Kane's Equation–Solving Trunk Motion with Load Carriage,” American Journal of Scientific Industrial Research, 2, pp. 678685 (2011).
20. Anglin, C. and Wyss, U. P., “Review of Arm Motion Analyses,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers; Part H; Journal of Engineering Medicine, 214, pp. 541555 (2000).
21. Richards, J. G., “The Measurement of Human Motion: A Comparison of Commercially Available System,” Human Movement Science, 18, pp. 589602 (1999).
22. Zhou, H. and Hu, H., “Human Motion Tracking for Rehabilitation-A Survey,” Biomedical Signal Process Control, 3, pp. 118 (2008).
23. Cappozzo, A., Croce, U. D., Leardini, A. and Chiari, L., “Human Movement Analysis Using Sterophotogrammetry Part 1: Theoretical Background,” Gait & Posture, 21, pp. 186196 (2005).
24. Chiari, L., Croce, U. D., Leardini, A. and Cappozzo, A., “Human Movement Analysis Using Sterophotogrammetry Part 2: Instrumental Errors,” Gait & Posture, 21, pp. 197211 (2005).
25. Leardini, A., Chiari, L., Croce, U. D. and Cappozzo, A., “Human Movement Analysis Using Sterophotogrammetry Part 3: Soft Tissue Artifact Assessment and Compensation,” Gait & Posture, 21, pp. 212225 (2005).
26. Croce, U. D., Leardini, A., Chiari, L. and Cappozzo, A., “Human Movement Analysis Using Sterophotogrammetry Part 4: Assessment of Anatomical Landmark Misplacement and Its Effects on Joint Kinematics,” Gait & Posture, 21, pp. 226237 (2005).
27. Schmidt, R., Disselhorst-Klug, C., Silny, J. and Rau, G., “A Marker-Based Measurement Procedure for Unconstrained Wrist and Elbow Motions,” Journal of Biomechanics, 32, pp. 615621 (1999).
28. Biryukova, E. V., Roby-Brami, A., Frolov, A. A. and Mokhtari, M., “Kinematics of Human Arm Reconstructed From Spatial Tracking System Recordings,” Journal of Biomechanics, 33, pp. 985995 (2000).
29. Prokopenko, R. A., Biryukova, E. V., Roby-Brami, A. and Frolov, A. A., “Assement of the Accuracy of a Human Arm Model with Seven Degrees of Freedom,” Journal of Biomechanics, 34, pp. 177185 (2001).
30. Hingtgen, B., McGuire, J. R., Wang, M. and Harris, G. F., “An Upper Extremity Kinematic Model for Evaluation of Hemiparetic Stroke,” Journal of Biomechanics, 39, pp. 681688 (2006).
32. Romilly, D. P., Anglin, C., Gosine, R. G., Hershler, C. and Raschke, S. U., “A Functional Task Analysis and Motion Simulation for the Development of a Powered Upper-Limb Orthosis,” IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering, 2, pp. 119129 (1994).
33. DeLeva, P., “Adjustments to Zatsiorsky-Seluyanov's Segment Inertia Parameters,” Journal of Biomechanics, 29, pp. 12231230 (1996).
34. The Stock Precision Engineered Components (SPEC), Associated Spring, [Online]. Available:http://springming.sobuy.com/ezfiles/spring-ming/img/img/61161/SPEC-04E.pdf.
35. Dumas, R., Aissaoui, R. and De Guise, J. A., “A 3D Generic Inverse Dynamic Method Using Wrench Notation and Quaternionalgebra,” Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, 7, pp. 159166 (2004).

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed