Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Development of a Numerical Based Correlation for Performance Losses due to Surface Roughness in Axial Turbines

  • S. A. Moshizi (a1), M. H. Nakhaei (a1), M. J. Kermani (a1) and A. Madadi (a1)

Abstract

In the present work, a recently developed in-house 2D CFD code is used to study the effect of gas turbine stator blade roughness on various performance parameters of a two-dimensional blade cascade. The 2D CFD model is based on a high resolution flux difference splitting scheme of Roe (1981). The Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations are closed using the zero-equation turbulence model of Baldwin-Lomax (1978) and two-equation Shear Stress Transport (SST) turbulence model. For the smooth blade, results are compared with experimental data to validate the model. Finally, a correlation between roughness Reynolds number and loss coefficient for both turbulence models is presented and tested for three other roughness heights. The results of 2D turbine blade cascades can be used for one-dimensional models such as mean line analysis or quasi-three-dimensional models e.g. streamline curvature method.

Copyright

Corresponding author

References

Hide All
1.Lakshminarasimha, A. N., Boyce, M. P. and Meher-Homji, C. B., “Modeling and Analysis of Gas Turbine Performance Deterioration,” Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 116, pp. 4652 (1994).
2.Yun, Y. I., Park, I. Y. and Song, S. J., “Performance Degradation Due to Blade Surface Roughness in a Single-Stage Axial Turbine,” Journal of Turbomachinery, 127, pp. 137143 (2005).
3.Bammert, K. and Sandstede, H., “Measurements of the Boundary Layer Development Along a Turbine Blade with Rough Surfaces,” Journal for Engineering for Power, 102, pp. 978983 (1980).
4.El-Batsh, H. and Haselbacher, H., “Numerical Investigation of the Effect of Ash Particle Deposition on the Flow Field Through Turbine Cascades,” ASME Proceedings, 5, pp. 10351043 (2002).
5.Hummel, F., Cardamone, P., Fottner, L. and Lötzerich, M., “Surface Roughness Effects on Turbine Blade Aero-dynamics,” Journal of Turbomachinery, 127, pp. 453461 (2004).
6.Arts, T., De Rouvroit, L. and Rutherford, A. W., “Aero-thermal Investigation of a Highly Loaded Transonic Linear Turbine Guide Vane Cascade: A Test Case for Inviscid and Viscous Flow Computations,” Technical note Von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics Voulume 174, von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics, Belgium (1990).
7.Cebeci, T. and Chang, K. C., “Calculation of Incompressible Rough-Wall Boundary-Layer Flows,” AIAA Journal, 16, pp. 730735 (1978).
8.Boyle, R. J., “Prediction of Surface Roughness and Incidence Effects on Turbine Performance,” Journal of Turbomachinery, 116, pp. 745751 (1994).
9.Boyle, R. J. and Civinskas, K. C., “Two-Dimensional Navier-Stokes Heat Transfer Analysis for Rough Turbine Blades,” 27th Joint Propulsion Conference, Sacramento, California (1991).
10.Kang, Y. S., Yoo, J. C. and Kang, S. H., “Numerical Study of Roughness Effects on a Turbine Stage Performance,” ASME Proceedings Turbomachinery, 5, pp. 12671274 (2004).
11.Morini, M., Pinelli, M., Spina, P. R. and Venturini, M., “Influence of Blade Deterioration on Compressor and Turbine Performance,” Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 132, pp. 032401032411 (2009).
12.Boyle, R. J. and Senyitko, R. G., “Measurements and Predictions of Surface Roughness Effects on Turbine Vane Aerodynamics,” Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo, Nevada, U.S.A (2003).
13.Baldwin, B. and Lomax, H., “Thin-Layer Approximation and Algebraic Model for Separated Turbulentflows,” 16th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Huntsville (1978).
14.Chima, R. V., “Application of the K-Omega Turbulence Model to Quasi-Three-Dimensional Turbomachinery Flows,” AIAA Journal of Propulsion and Power, 12, pp. 11761179 (1996).
15.Lampart, P., Swirydczuk, J. and Gardzilewicz, A., “On the Prediction of Flow Patterns and Losses in HP Axial Turbine Stages Using 3D RANS Solve with Two Turbulence Models,” TASK Quarterly, 5, (2001).
16.Yershov, S. V., Rusanov, A. V. and Shapochka, A. Y., “3D Viscous Transonic Turbomachine Flows: Numerical Simulation and Optimisation Using Code FlowER,” 5th Internat. Symp. Aerothermo-dynamics of Internal Flows, Gdansk, Poland (2001).
17.Roe, P. L., “Approximate Riemann Solvers, Parameter Vectors, and Difference Schemes,” Journal of Computational Physics, 43, pp. 357372 (1981).
18.Hoffmann, K. A. and Chiang, S. T., Computational Fluid Dynamics, Engineering Education System, U.S. (2000).
19.van Albada, G. D., van Leer, B. and Roberts, W. W. J., “A Comparative Study of Computational Methods in Cosmic Gas Dynamics,” Astronomy and Astrophysics, 108, pp. 7684 (1982).
20.Kermani, M. and Plett, E., “Roe Scheme in Generalized Coordinates. I — Formulations,” 39th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (2001).
21.Kermani, M. and Plett, E., “Roe Scheme in Generalized Coordinates. II — Application to Inviscid and Viscous Flows,” 39th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (2001).
22.Menter, F. R., “Two-Equation Eddy-Viscosity Turbulence Models for Engineering Applications,” AIAA Journal, 32, pp. 15981605 (1994).
23.Smith, A. M. O. and Cebeci, T., “Numerical Solution of the Turbulent Boundary Layer Equations,” Douglas Aircraft Division Report DAC 33735 (1967).
24.Schlichting, H., Boundary-Layer Theory, 8th Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, USA (1979).
25.Wilcox, D. C., Turbulence Modeling for CFD, 3rd edition, DCW Industries, Inc., La Canada, CA (2006).
26.Streiner, S., Krämer, E., Eulitz, A. and Armbruster, P., “Aeroelastic Analysis of Wind Turbines Applying 3D CFD Computational Results,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 75 (2007).
27.Srinivasan, G. R., Ekaterinaris, J. A. and McCroskey, W. J., “Evaluation of Turbulence Models for Unsteady Flows of an Oscillating Airfoil,” Computers & Fluids, 24, pp. 833861 (1995).
28.Emery, J. C., Herrig, L. J., Erwin, J. R. and Felix, A. R., “Systematic Two-Dimensional Cascade Tests of NACA 65-Series Compressor Blades at Low Speeds,” NACA-Report-1368 (1958).
29.Apsley, D., “CFD Calculation of Turbulent Flow with Arbitrary Wall Roughness,” Flow Turbulence Combust, 78, pp. 153175 (2007).
30.Singoria, V. K., “Samsher, Mechanism, Characterization, Pattern and Effect of Roughness over Turbine Blade: A Review,” International Journal of Engineering and Innovative, 2, pp. 190200 (2013).
31.Taylor, R. P., “Surface Roughness Measurements on Gas Turbine Blades,” Journal of Turbomach, 112, pp. 175180 (1990).
32.Koch, C. C. and Smith, J. L. H., “Loss Sources and Magnitudes in Axial-Flow Compressors,” Journal for Engineering for Power, 98, pp. 411424 (1976).

Keywords

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Development of a Numerical Based Correlation for Performance Losses due to Surface Roughness in Axial Turbines

  • S. A. Moshizi (a1), M. H. Nakhaei (a1), M. J. Kermani (a1) and A. Madadi (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.