Skip to main content Accessibility help

Coefficients of Time and Length Scales of Turbulent Eddies

  • Keh-Chin Chang (a1) and Shih-Shiang Jeng (a1)


The turbulence time and length scales representing the energy containing eddies are by Tt = CtT k/ε and ℓt = Ct k32/ε, respectively, while the Kolmogorov time and length scales representing the energy dissipative eddies are expressed by Tk = CkT (ν/ε)1/2 and ℓk = Ck3/ε)1/4, respectively. The available DNS data for fully developed channel flows with and without wall injection / suction are used to determine the coefficients. It is found that, with the typical values of CtT = Ct = 1 which are usually adopted in the turbulence study, ckT = 2 and Ck = 3. However, this set of coefficients lead to underprediction of the thickness of viscous sublayer . By relaxing the usual assumption of CtT = Ct= 1, a new set of coefficients: CtT = Ct = 0.8, CkT = 4, and Ck = 9 is suggested. The calculated with this set of coefficients becomes more physically reasonable.


Corresponding author

**Graduate student


Hide All
1Bejan, A., Convection Heat Transfer, 2nd Edition, John Wiley, New York, pp. 303310 (1995).
2Shih, T. H. and Lumley, J. L., “Kolmogorov Behavior of New-wall Turbulence and Its Application in Turbulence Modelin.” Int. J. Computational Fluid Dynamics, 1, pp. 4356 (1993).
3Patel, V. C., Rodi, W. and Scheuerer, G., “Turbulence Models for Near-wall and Low Reynolds Number Flows: a Review,” AIAA J., 23, pp. 13081319 (1985).
4Chen, C. J. and Jaw, S. Y., Fundamentals of Turbulence Modeling, Taylor & Francis, Washington, D. C., pp. 115119 (1998).
5Yang, Z. and Shih, H. T., “New Time Scale B1ased k – ε Model for Near-wall Turbulence,” AIAA J., 31, pp. 11911198 (1993).
6Rahman, M. M. and Siikonen, T., “Improved Low Reynolds Number k –ε Model,” AIAA J., 38, pp. 12981300 (2000).
7Shyu, M. J. and Chang, K. C., “Limit of Eddy Length Scales in Use of Low-Reynolds-Number k – ε Models,” The Chinese J. Mechanics, B, 16, pp. 109118 (2000).
8Durbin, P. A., “Near-wall Turbulence Closure Modeling without Damping Functions,” Theoretical Computational Fluid Dynamics, 3, pp. 113 (1991).
9Durbin, P. A., “Separated Flow Computations with the k – ε – V 2 Model,” AIAA J., 33, pp. 659664 (1995).
10Sumitani, Y. and Kasagi, N., “Direct Numerical Simulation of Turbulent Transport with Uniform Wall Injection and Suction,” AIAA J., 33, pp. 12201228 (1995).
11Kim, J., Moin, P. and Moser, R., “Turbulence Statistics in Fully Developed Channel Flow at Low-Reynolds-Number,” J. Fluid Mech., 177, pp. 133166 (1987).
12Kim, J., “Collaborative Testing of Turbulence Models,” ERCOFTAC Fluid Dynamics Database www Services,
13Moser, R. D., Kim, J. and Mansour, N. N., “Direct Numerical Simulation of Turbulent Channel Flow up to Reτ = 590,” Physics Fluids, 11, pp. 943945 (1999).
14Schildknecht, M., Miller, J. A. and Meier, G. E. A., “The Influence of Suction on the Structure of Turbulence in Fully Developed Pipe Flow,” J. Fluid Mech., 90, pp. 67107 (1979).
15Julien, H. L., Kays, W. M. and Moffat, R. J., “Experimental Hydrodynamics of the Accelerated Turbulent Boundary Layer with and without Mass Injection,” J. Heat Transfer, 93, pp. 373379 (1971).


Coefficients of Time and Length Scales of Turbulent Eddies

  • Keh-Chin Chang (a1) and Shih-Shiang Jeng (a1)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed