Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T23:54:48.262Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

X-ray diffraction and microstructural studies in 2 : 17 type Sm–Co magnetic alloys containing Fe, Cu, and Zr

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

R. Gopalan
Affiliation:
Defence Metallurgical Research Laboratory, Hyderabad-500 058, India
T. S. R. K. Sastry
Affiliation:
Defence Metallurgical Research Laboratory, Hyderabad-500 058, India
A. K. Singh
Affiliation:
Defence Metallurgical Research Laboratory, Hyderabad-500 058, India
V. Chandrasekaran
Affiliation:
Defence Metallurgical Research Laboratory, Hyderabad-500 058, India
Get access

Abstract

X-ray diffraction and microstructural studies were carried out on 2 : 17 type Sm–Co alloys containing Fe, Cu, and Zr (13–14 at.% Sm, 57–60 at.% Co, 20–22 at.% Fe, 4 at.% Cu, and 3 at.% Zr) in as-cast and heat-treated conditions. Microstructural studies revealed that the as-cast alloys contain three phases. It was observed that the samples subjected to sintering at 1463 K for 45 min followed by a solution treatment at 1448 K for 1 h resulted in nearly a single-phase, rhombohedral crystal structure (Th2Zn17-type). Subsequent isothermal aging at 1123 K and ramp-cooling to 673 K resulted in a mixture of Sm2Co17- and SmCo5-type phases with the former as major phase. It was also found that samples (Sm > 13 at.%) sintered at temperatures >1463 K showed incipient melting and multiphase formation.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Ojima, T., Tomizawa, S., Yoneyama, T., and Hori, T., IEEE Trans. Magn. 13, 1317 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Liu, S. and Ray, A. E., IEEE Trans. Magn. MAG- 25, 3785 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Liu, S., Ray, A. E., and Mildrum, H. F., IEEE Trans. Magn. MAG–26, 1382 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Liu, S., Ray, A. E., Chen, C. H., and Mildrum, H. F., J. Appl. Phys. 69, 5853 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Huang, M.Q., Zheng, Y., and Wallace, W. E., J. Appl. Phys. 75, 6280 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Hadjipanayis, G.C., Yadlousky, E. J., and Wollins, S. H., J. Appl. Phys. 53, 2386 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Mishra, R.K., Thomas, G., Yoneyama, T., Fukuno, A., and Ojima, T., J. Appl. Phys. 52, 2517 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Rabenberg, L., Mishra, R.K., and Thomas, G., J. Appl. Phys. 53, 2389 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Hadjipanayis, G.C., 3rd Int. Symp. on Magnetic Anisotropy and Coercivity in Rare Earth–Transition Metal Alloys S–7, 667 (1982).Google Scholar
10.Fidler, J. and Skalicky, P., 3rd Int. Symp. on Magnetic Anisotropy and Coercivity in Rare Earth–Transition Metal Alloys S–7, 585 (1982).Google Scholar
11.Kianvash, A. and Harris, I. R., J. Less-Common Metals 98, 93 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Wong, B.Y., Willard, M., and Laughlin, D. E., J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 169, 178 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Skomski, R., J. Appl. Phys. 81, 5627 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Rabenberg, L., Mishra, R.K., and Thomas, G., IEEE Trans. Magn. MAG–19, 2723 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Buschow, K.H.J, Rep. Prog. Phys. 40, 1179 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Morita, Y., Umeda, T., and Kimura, Y., Proc. of the MRS Int. Meeting on Advanced Materials, 11, edited by Doyama, M., Sōmiya, S., and Chang, R.P.H, May 31–June 3, 1988, Sunshine City, Ikebukura, Tokyo, Japan, p. 97.Google Scholar
17.Ray, A.E. and Liu, S., J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 1, 183 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Chang, W.C., Shu, W. B., Chang, C.C., and Chin, T. S., Proc. of the MRS Int. Meeting on Advanced Materials 11, edited by Doyama, M., Sōmiya, S., and Chang, R.P.H, May 31–June 3, 1988, Sunshine City, Ikebukura, Tokyo, Japan, p. 109.Google Scholar