Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T17:12:43.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Synthesis and Characterization of FeCoNiAl Nanocapsules by Plasma arc Discharge Process

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2011

Dian-Yu Geng ,
Woo-Young Park ,
Jin-Chun Kim ,
Ji-Hun Yu ,
Chul-Jin Choi  and
Zhi-Dong Zhang
Dian-Yu Geng*
Affiliation:
Korea Institute of Machinery and Materials, Changwon, Kyungnam 641-010, South Korea; and Shenyang National Laboratory for Materials Science, Institute of Metal Research, and International Centre for Materials Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, People’s Republic of China
Woo-Young Park
Affiliation:
Korea Institute of Machinery and Materials, Changwon, Kyungnam 641-010, South Korea
Jin-Chun Kim
Affiliation:
Korea Institute of Machinery and Materials, Changwon, Kyungnam 641-010, South Korea
Ji-Hun Yu
Affiliation:
Korea Institute of Machinery and Materials, Changwon, Kyungnam 641-010, South Korea
Chul-Jin Choi
Affiliation:
Korea Institute of Machinery and Materials, Changwon, Kyungnam 641-010, South Korea
Zhi-Dong Zhang
Affiliation:
Shenyang National Laboratory for Materials Science, Institute of Metal Research,and International Centre for Materials Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences,Shenyang 110016, People’s Republic of China
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: dygeng@imr.ac.cn
Get access

Abstract

A series of magnetic FeCoNiAl nanocapsules was synthesized by the plasma arc discharge method; the targets of Fe, Co, Ni, and Al powders were changed with varying compositions. The compositions of the nanocapsules were found to be quite different from those of the corresponding targets; the relative amount of Al (or Ni, Co) to Fe was increased (or decreased). Structures, particles sizes, composition, surface composition, magnetic properties, and thermal stability of the nanocapsules were investigated. The saturation magnetization Ms = 106.8 emu/g and coercive force iHc = 367 Oe were achieved for the nanocapsules with the Fe62.5Co21Ni13Al2.5 target. In the FeCoNiAl nanocapsules, the binding energies of Fe, Co, and Ni were different from those of the metals Fe, Co, and Ni. The binding energies of Fe2p3/2 and Fe2p1/2 of the nanocapsules were 708.2 and 721.3 eV, respectively. The four-layer structure was proposed to give a clear statement of how the composition and phase varied radially in the nanocapsules. The major contents of the four layers—i.e., the outer shell, the inner shell, the outer core and the inner core—were amorphous alumina, crystalline alumina, transition metal oxides, and transition metal alloy, respectively. The compositions, structures, particle size, and grain size of the nanocapsules all affect their magnetic properties. In the FeCoNiAl nanocapsules, the greater th amount of the body-centered-cubic phase, the stronger the ferromagnetic magnetic properties.

Keywords

NanoparticleMagnetic propertiesX-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS)
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 20 , Issue 9 , September 2005 , pp. 2534 - 2543
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Zhang, Z.D. Nanocapsules, in Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology VI, edited by Nalwa, H.S., (American Scientific Publishers, Stevenson Ranch, CA, 2004), pp. 77 and 79.Google Scholar
2Saito, Y.: Nanocapsules and filled nanocapsules. Carbon 33, 979 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Li, J., Liu, C.Y., Zhao, B.G., Lin, Y.Q. and Deng, Z.J.: Structures and properties of Fe-C fine particles prepared by ac arc discharge. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 195, 470 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Dong, X.L., Zhang, Z.D., Jin, S.R. and Kim, B.H.: Carbon-coated Fe–Co(C) nanoparticles prepared by arc-discharge in methane. J. Appl. Phys. 86, 6701 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Zhang, Z.D., Zheng, J.G., Škorvánek, I., Wen, G.H., Kováč, J., Wang, F.W., Yu, J.L., Li, Z.J., Dong, X.L., Jin, S.R., Liu, W. and Zhang, X.X.: Shell/core structure and magnetic properties of carbon-coated FeCo(C) nanocapsules. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 13, 1921 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Dong, X.L., Zhang, Z.D., Zhao, X.G., Chuang, Y.C., Jin, S.R. and Sun, W.M.: Surface characterization and magnetic properties of ultrafine Fe–Ni(C) particles. J. Mater. Res. 14, 1782 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Li, X.G. and Takahashi, S.: Synthesis and magnetic properties of Fe-Co-Ni nanoparticles by hydrogen plasma-metal reaction. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 214, 195 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Geng, D.Y., Zhang, Z.D., Zhang, W.S., Si, P.Z., Zhao, X.G., Liu, W., Hu, K.Y., Jin, Z.X. and Song, X.P.: Al2O3 coated α–Fe solution nanocapsules prepared by arc discharge. Scripta Mater. 48, 593 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Geng, D.Y., Kim, J.C., Choi, C.J., Chen, C.L., Zhao, X.G. and Zhang, Z.D.: Synthesis and characterization of nanocapsules of α–Fe(NiCoAl) solid-solution. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 3, 297 (2005).Google Scholar
10Pithawalla, Y.B., Elshall, M.S. and Deevi, S.C.: Synthesis and characterization of nanocrystalline iron aluminide particles. Intermetallics 8, 1225 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Hang, J.D. and Yang, Y.S.: Handbook of Magnetic Materials (III) (Metallurgic Press, Beijing, China, 1985), pp. 446, 448 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
12Ohno, S. and Uda, M.: Generation rate of ultrafine metal particles in hydrogen plasma-metal reaction. Trans. Jpn. Inst. Met. 48, 640 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Guo, Z.Y. and Zhao, W.H.: Electric Arc and Hot Plasma (Science Press, Beijing, China, 1986), p. 17 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
14Zhang, Z.X.: Handbook of Physical Constants (Science Press, Beijing, China, 1979), p. 84.Google Scholar
15Moulder, J.F., Stickle, W.F., Sobol, P.E. and Bomben, K.D.: Handbook of X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy, edited by Chastain, Jill (Perkin-Elmer Corporation, Physical Electronics Division, Eden Prairie, MN, 1992), pp. 25, 55, 81, 83, 85.Google Scholar
16Descostes, M., Mercier, F., Thromat, N., Beaucaire, C. and Gautier-Soyer, M.: Use of XPS in the determination of chemical environment and oxidation state of iron and sulfur samples: Constitution of a data basis in binding energies for Fe and S reference compounds and applications to the evidence of surface species of an oxidized pyrite in a cabonate medium. Appl. Surf. Sci. 165, 288 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar