Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-w95db Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-15T03:27:21.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Simultaneous real-time study of initial hillocking and changes in overall stress in evaporated Al films during heating

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

C. Kylner
Affiliation:
Department of Physics II – Optics, Royal Institute of Technology, S-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden, and Surface Evaluation Laboratory, Institute of Optical Research, S-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
L. Mattsson
Affiliation:
Surface Evaluation Laboratory, Institute of Optical Research, S-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
Get access

Abstract

Optical quality Al films were evaporated by an electron beam onto Si wafers in an ultrahigh vacuum system. The as-deposited samples were radiative heated at a rate of 3 °C/s in air environment. During heating, measurements of initial hillocking and changes in overall film stress were performed simultaneously and in real time as a function of time and temperature with a specially designed optical instrument. The physical principles of this instrument are based on laser beam deflection caused by film stress induced wafer bending and partial integrated light scattering from surface roughening. The experimental results show how the initial hillocking is accompanied by changes in the overall stress and yield a very good correlation between the onset of hillock formation and the maximum change in overall stress.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Schwarzer, R. A. and Gerth, D., J. Electron Mater. 22 (6), 607 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Mattsson, L., Page, Y-H. Le, and Ericsson, F., Thin Solid Films 198, 149 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Koleshko, V. M., Belitsky, V. F., and Kiryushin, I. V., Thin Solid Films 142, 199 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Thouless, M. D., Gupta, J., and Harper, J. M. E., J. Mater. Res. 8, 1845 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Nix, W. D., Metall. Trans. 20A, 2217 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Sinha, A. K., Levinstein, H. J., and Smith, T. E., J. Appl. Phys. 49 (4), 2423 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Flinn, P. A., Gardner, D. S., and Nix, W. D., IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. ED–34 (3), 689 (1987).Google Scholar
8.Flinn, P. A., in Thin Films: Stresses and Mechanical Properties, edited by Bravman, J. C., Nix, W. D., Barnett, D. M., and Smith, D. A. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 130, Pittsburgh, PA, 1989), p. 41.Google Scholar
9.Hershkovitz, M., Blech, I. A., and Komem, Y., Thin Solid Films 130, 87 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Gardner, D. S. and Flinn, P. A., IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. 35 (12), 2160 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Kylner, C. and Mattsson, L., in Thin Films: Stresses and Mechanical Properties VI, edited by Gerberich, W. W., Gao, H., Sundgren, J-E., and Baker, S. P. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 436, Pittsburgh, PA, 1996), p. 257.Google Scholar
12.Kylner, C. and Mattsson, L., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 68 (1), 143 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Bennett, J. M. and Dancy, J. H., Appl. Opt. 20 (10), 1785 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Mattsson, L., in Thin Film Technologies, edited by Jacobsson, J. R. (Proc. SPIE 652, 1986), p. 264.Google Scholar
15.Stoney, G. G., Proc. R. Soc. London A 82, 172 (1909).Google Scholar
16.Nix, W. D., private communication.Google Scholar
17.Venkatraman, R. and Bravman, J. C., J. Mater. Res. 7, 2040 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Doerner, M. F., Gardner, D. S., and Nix, W. D., J. Mater. Res. 1, 845 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Turlo, J., Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University, 1992.Google Scholar
20.Kylner, C. and Mattsson, L., Thin Solid Films 307, 169 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Doerner, M. F. and Nix, W. D., Crit. Rev. Solid State Mater. Sci. 14 (3), 225 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar