Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-fmk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-26T10:11:43.075Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Role of Cement Type on Carbonation Attack

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

S. Goñi
Affiliation:
Institute of Construction Science “Eduardo Torroja” Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Centificas (CSIC), Serrano Galvache, s/n, 28033 Madrid, Spain
M. T. Gaztañaga
Affiliation:
Institute of Construction Science “Eduardo Torroja” Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Centificas (CSIC), Serrano Galvache, s/n, 28033 Madrid, Spain
A. Guerrero
Affiliation:
Institute of Construction Science “Eduardo Torroja” Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Centificas (CSIC), Serrano Galvache, s/n, 28033 Madrid, Spain
Get access

Abstract

The carbonation of two hydrated ordinary portland cements of alkali content 1.03% or 0.43% Na2O equivalent and hydrated calcium aluminate cement (0.1% Na2O equivalent) was studied in a semi-dynamic atmosphere of 100% CO2, and 65% relative humidity at 20 ± 1 °C, for a period of 100 days. The changes of the microstructure before and during the carbonation were characterized by x-ray diffraction, mercury intrusion porosimetry, and scanning electron microscopy. The kinetics of the process was evaluated from the total CaCO3 content by means of thermogravimetric analysis. The changes of the mechanical flexural strength were also studied. The pore solution was collected and analyzed before and after different periods of time. The results were compared with those obtained under natural carbonation conditions. The results showed that the alkali content of cement does not influence the kinetics of the process when the carbonation is accelerated. In the case of natural carbonation, an induction period is produced in the ordinary portland cement of low alkali content and calcium aluminate cement. The carbonation rate of calcium aluminate cement is the slowest for accelerated and natural carbonation.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Goñi, S., Macías, A., Madrid, J., and Díez, J.M., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 82, 1275 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaztañaga, M.T., Goñi, S., and Sagrera, J.L., Solid State Ionics 63–65, 797 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaztañaga, M.T., Ph.D. Thesis, University Complutense Madrid, Spain (1996).Google Scholar
Taylor, H.F.W., in Cement Chemistry, edited by Taylor, H.F.W. (Academic Press, London, United Kingdom, 1992), Chap. 10, pp. 333.Google Scholar
Smolczyk, H.G., in Carbonation of Concrete, RILEM International Symposium (Cement & Concrete Association), 1976 Fulmer Grange, Fulmer Slough, SL2 4QS United Kingdom, Theme 1, paper 1.Google Scholar
Gaztañaga, M.T., Goñi, S., Guerrero, A., and Hernández, M.S., in Performance and Durability of Cementitious Materials, IV, edited by Justnes, H. (SINTEF Civil and Environmental Engineering, Cement and Concrete, Trondheim, Norway, 1997), 4iv003.Google Scholar
George, C.M., in Mechanical Chemistry Degradation of Cement-Based Systems, edited by Scrivener, K.L., Young, J.F.E., and Spon, F.N. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc.), Vol. 1, pp. 253263.Google Scholar
Sorrentino, D. and Sorrentino, F., in Materials Science of Concrete IV, edited by Skalny, Jan and Mindess, Sidney (Am. Ceram. Soc., Westerville, OH, 1995), pp. 4190.Google Scholar
Mehta, P. Kumar, in Concrete Structure, Properties, and Materials, edited by Mehta, P. Kumar (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1986), p. 27.Google Scholar
Xi, Y. and Jennings, H.M., in Materials Science of Concrete III, edited by Skalny, Jan (Am. Ceram. Soc., Westerville, OH, 1992), pp. 3770.Google Scholar
Ngala, V.T. and Page, C.L., Cem. Concr. Res. 27, 995 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kobayashi, K. and Uno, Y., Cem. Concr. Res. 20, 619 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsusato, H., Ogawa, K., Funato, M., and Sato, T., in 9th Int. Congr. Chem. Cem. (Natl. Counc. Cem. Build. Mater., New Delhi, India, 1992), Vol. 5, pp. 363369.Google Scholar
Honda, M. and Shizawa, M., Ceram. Trans. 40, 203 (1994).Google Scholar
Maslehuddin, M., Shirokoff, J., and Siddiqui, M.A.B., Adv. Cem. Res. 8, 167 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, A., Rodhe, M., and Chandra, S., in Durability Build. Mater. Compon. 7, edited by Sjoestroem, C. (Proc. 7th Int. Conf., E&FN Spon, London, United Kingdom, 1996), pp. 596604.Google Scholar
Reardon, E.J., Cem. Concr. Res. 20, 175 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goñi, S., Alonso, C., Menéndez, E., Hidalgo, A., and Andrade, C., in Performance and Durability of Cementitious Materials, edited by Justnes, H. (SINTEF Civil and Environmental Engineering, Cement and Concrete, Trondheim, Norway, 1997), 4iv004, p. 8.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, K., Shirako, R., Kawai, K., and Hoshino, T., Seisan Kenkyu 41, 940943 (1989), Chem. Abst. 112, 184803.Google Scholar
Macías, A. and Gon˜i, S., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 81, 2894 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, I.G., Groves, G.W., Brough, A., and Dobson, C.M., in 9th Int. Congr. Chem. Cem. (National Council for Cement & Building Materials, New Delhi, India, 1992), Vol. IV, pp. 298303.Google Scholar
Sauman, Z., Cem. Concr. Res. 16, 645 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauman, Z., Cem. Concr. Res. 2, 541 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, R.L., Cem. Concr. Res. 9, 649 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kondo, R., Daimon, M., and Akiba, T., in Proc. 5th Int. Symp. Chem. Cem. (Cement Association of Japan, 1969), Vol. III, pp. 402409.Google Scholar
Cole, W.F. and Kroone, B., J. Am. Concr. Inst. 56, 1275 (1960).Google Scholar
Krzywoblocka-Laurow, R., in Carbonation of Concrete—RILEM International Symposium (Cement and Concrete Association, Fulmer Grange, Fulmer Slough, SL2 4QS, United Kingdom, 1976), Theme 1, paper 6.Google Scholar
Suzuki, K., Nishikawa, T., and Hayashi, T., Semento Konkurito Ronbunshu 43, 18 (1989).Google Scholar