Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T21:46:39.282Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Growth of (110)-oriented diamond films by electron-assisted chemical vapor deposition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Kazuo Kumagai
Affiliation:
Kobe Steel, Ltd., Electronics Research Laboratory, 1-5-5 Takatsuka-dai, Nishi-ku, Kobe 651-22, Japan
Koichi Miyata
Affiliation:
Kobe Steel, Ltd., Electronics Research Laboratory, 1-5-5 Takatsuka-dai, Nishi-ku, Kobe 651-22, Japan
Kozo Nishimura
Affiliation:
Kobe Steel, Ltd., Electronics Research Laboratory, 1-5-5 Takatsuka-dai, Nishi-ku, Kobe 651-22, Japan
Koji Kobashi
Affiliation:
Kobe Steel, Ltd., Electronics Research Laboratory, 1-5-5 Takatsuka-dai, Nishi-ku, Kobe 651-22, Japan
Get access

Abstract

Diamond films were deposited on Si substrates by Electron-Assisted Chemical Vapor Deposition (EACVD) using various methane concentrations below 8.1%. It was found that the deposited films were strongly (110)-oriented. This seemed to arise from a high nucleation density of diamond caused by the initial deposition of an amorphous carbon film. A comparison of the graphite etching rate between EACVD and Microwave Plasma CVD (MPCVD) under the standard growth conditions showed that EACVD was able to etch graphite about five times faster than MPCVD. Hence, it was concluded that the differences in the growth rate and morphology between EACVD and MPCVD arise from the different graphite etching rates as well as different chemical species in the reaction gas.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Kobashi, K.Nishimura, K.Kawate, Y. and Horiuchi, T.Phys. Rev. B 38, 4067 (1988).Google Scholar
2Matsumoto, S.Sato, Y.Tsutsumi, M. and Setaka, N.J. Mater. Sci. 17, 3106 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Kobashi, K.Nishimura, K.Miyata, K.Kumagai, K. and Nakaue, A., J. Mater. Res. 5, 2469 (1990).Google Scholar
4Sawabe, A. and Inuzuka, T.Appl. Phys. Lett. 46, 146 (1985); ibid., Thin Solid Films 137, 89 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Lee, Y.H.Richard, P.D.Bachman, K.J. and Glass, J.T.Appl. Phys. Lett. 56, 620 (1990).Google Scholar
6Moustakas, T. D.Solid State Ionics 32/33, 861 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Shroder, R.E.Nemanich, R.J. and Glass, J.T.Phys. Rev. B 41, 3738 (1990-1911).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Bonnot, A. M.Phys. Rev. B 41, 6040 (1990-1911).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Chen, C.F.Huang, Y. C.Hosomi, S. and Yoshida, I.Mater. Res. Bull. XXIV 87 (1989).Google Scholar
10Celii, F. G.Pehrsson, P.E.Wang, H.T. and Butler, J.E.Appl. Phys. Lett. 52, 2043 (1988).Google Scholar
11Wild, Ch.Herres, N. and Koidl, P.J. Appl. Phys. 68, 973 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Ravi, K.V. and Landstrass, M.I.Proc. Electrochem. Soc. 89–2, 24 (1989).Google Scholar