Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T17:52:16.056Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Generation of carbon tripods on copper by chemical vapor deposition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

F. Le Normand*
Affiliation:
IPCMS-GSI, UMR 1046 du CNRS, Bat 69, 23, rue du Loess, 67037 Strasbourg Cedex, FRANCE
L. Constant
Affiliation:
IPCMS-GSI, UMR 1046 du CNRS, Bat 69, 23, rue du Loess, 67037 Strasbourg Cedex, FRANCE
G. Ehret
Affiliation:
IPCMS-GSI, UMR 1046 du CNRS, Bat 69, 23, rue du Loess, 67037 Strasbourg Cedex, FRANCE
C. Speisser
Affiliation:
IPCMS-GSI, UMR 1046 du CNRS, Bat 69, 23, rue du Loess, 67037 Strasbourg Cedex, FRANCE
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author.
Get access

Abstract

We report the first observation of large graphitic capped clusters with threefold symmetry (tripods). They were generated under the diamond growth conditions by the chemical vapor deposition process activated by hot filaments on a Cu(111) surface while conditions of very poor diamond nucleation (104–105 cm-2) are fullfilled. They were characterized by direct high resolution imaging and selected area diffraction. Furthermore, a lot of them are connected. The behavior of hydrogen radicals to curl and to close limited-size graphitic planes is emphasized to explain their formation. These tripods appear to be readily stable carbon as they form only after other limited-size graphitic clusters such as graphite lumps or bucky onions. It is thus expected that the chemical vapor deposition process is a quite relevant preparation method to grow in a controlled way new forms of carbon with a narrow size distribution.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. (a)Yarbrough, W. and Messier, R., Science 247, 688 (1990);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(b)Angus, J.C. and Hayman, C. C., Science 241, 913 (1988);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(c)Spear, K.E., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 72, 171 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Constant, L., Speisser, C., and Le Normand, F., Surf. Sci. 387 28 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Constant, L., Romeo, M., Speisser, C., and Le Normand, F., Philos. Mag A (1999, in press).Google Scholar
4.Banhart, F. and Ajayan, P.M., Nature 382, 433 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. (a)Wesolowski, P., Lyutovich, Y., Banhart, F., Carstanjen, H.D., and Kronmüller, H., Appl. Phys. Lett. 71, 1948 (1997);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(b)Zaiser, M. and Banhart, F., Phys. Rev. Lett., 79, 3680 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Zwanger, M.S., Banhart, F., and Seeger, A., J. Cryst. Growth 163, 445 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. (a)Scuseria, G. E., Chem. Phys. Lett., 195, 534 (1992);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(b)Vanderbilt, D. and Tersoff, J., Phys. Rev. Lett., 68, 511 (1992);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(c)Lenosky, T., Gonze, X., Teter, M., and Elser, V., Nature 355, 333 (1992);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(d)Ihara, S., Itoh, S., Akagi, K., Tamura, R., and Tsukada, M., Phys. Rev. B 54, 14713 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Iijima, S., Ajayan, P. M., and Ichihashi, T., Phys. Rev. Lett., 69, 3100 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Osawa, E., Yoshida, M., and Fujita, M., Mater. Res. Bull. 19, 11, 33 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Saito, Y., Yoshikawa, T., Inagaki, M., Tomita, M., and Hayashi, T., Chem. Phys. Lett., 204, 277 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Krishnan, A., Dujardin, E., Treacy, M. M. J., Hugdahl, J., Lynum, S., and Ebbesen, T.W., Nature 388, 451 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Ugarte, D., Nature (London) 359, 707 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Cabioc'h, T., Rivière, J.P., and Delafond, J., J. Mater. Sci. 30, 4787 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar