Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T01:27:58.072Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Electro-chemo-mechanical treatment: Facilitating steel grinding under electrochemical reduction of active cations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2011

I.V. Vidensky ,
I.V. Petrova  and
E.D. Shchukin
I.V. Vidensky
Affiliation:
Institute for Physical Chemistry, Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, Russia
I.V. Petrova
Affiliation:
Institute for Physical Chemistry, Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, Russia
E.D. Shchukin
Affiliation:
Institute for Physical Chemistry, Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, Russia and Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218
Get access

Abstract

Earlier it was shown that some liquid metals may facilitate the cutting of hard materials, being strongly surface-active media with respect to these solids (decreasing their surface energy), e.g., Zn for steels, Cd for titanium alloys, etc. Recently, a similar physico-chemical principle has been proposed and realized in the course of active metals (Zn, Cd) depositing on the surface of a treated sample (ground tempered steel, 50 HRC) by means of reduction of their cations on a sample used as a cathode in a corresponding electrochemical cell, at room temperature, with a very small amount of active substance, and at very low current densities (∼50 mA/cm2); under such conditions, grinding is 1.5–2 times more effective than in the same aqueous solutions without current.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 8 , Issue 9 , September 1993 , pp. 2224 - 2227
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Rehbinder, P. A. and Shchukin, E. D., Progress in Surface Science, edited by Davidson, S. C. (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1972), Vol. 3, p. 97.Google Scholar
2Shchukin, E. D., in Mechanisms of Catalysis (Nauka, Novosibirsk, 1984), p. 142.Google Scholar
3Shchukin, E. D., in Surface Effects in Crystal Plasticity, edited by Latanision, R. M. and Fourie, J. T. (Leiden-Nordhoff, 1977), p. 701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Likhtman, V., Shchukin, E., and Rehbinder, P., Physico-Chemical Mechanics of Metals (Israel Program for Scientific Translation, Jerusalem, 1964).Google Scholar
5Rehbinder, P. A. and Venstrem, E. K., Physico-Chemical Mechanics (Nauka, Moscow, 1979), p. 154.Google Scholar
6Ahearn, J. S., Mills, J. J., and Westwood, A. R. C., J. Appl. Phys. 49, 96 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Brittle Fracture, edited by Westbrook, J. H. (New York Press, 1967), p. 68.Google Scholar
8Latanision, R. M., Nielsen, K. C., and Kirchbaum, R., Modern Machine Shop 2, 69 (1974).Google Scholar
9Westwood, A. R. C., Ahearn, J. S., and Mills, J. J., J. Colloids and Surfaces 2, 1 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Stress Corrosion Cracking and Hydrogen Embrittlement of Iron Base Alloys, edited by Staehle, R. W., Hochmann, J., et al. (National Association of Corrosion Engineering, Houston, TX, 1977).Google Scholar
11Babey, Yu. and Soprunyuk, I., Zashchita Stali ot Korr.–Mech. Razrushenia (Technika, Kiev, 1981).Google Scholar
12Zashchita ot Vodorodnogo Iznosa, edited by Polyakov, A. (Mashinostroenie, Moscow, 1980).Google Scholar
13Ponyativsky, Ye., Senkov, O., and Bashkin, I., Metallofizika 12, 20 (1990).Google Scholar
14Petch, N. J., Philos. Mag. 1, 331 (1956).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Latanision, R. M., Atomistics of Fracture, edited by Latanision, R. M. and Pickens, J. R. (Plenum Press, New York and London, 1983), p. 20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Poduraev, V. and Kamalov, V., Fiziko-Khimich. Metody Obrabotki (Mashinostroenie, Moscow, 1973).Google Scholar
17Polukarova, Z., Andreeva, I., Bryukhanova, L., Petrova, I., and Shchukin, E., Fiz. i Khim. Obrabotki Materialov 5, 141 (1978).Google Scholar
18Andreeva, I., Bryukhanova, L., and Shchukin, E., Fiz-Khim. Mech. Materialov 15, 25 (1979).Google Scholar
19Pertsov, N., Shchukin, E., and Gorunov, Yu., Almazy 3, 12 (1972).Google Scholar
20Latanision, R. M., Patent to Martin Marietta Corp., “Machining Method”, 87, 512, 3-25-75, Cl. 204-129. 460.Google Scholar
21Polukarova, Z., Uspenskaya, L., Maksimova, A., Bryukhanova, L., Shchukin, E., Zanozin, V., and Nikitina, Z., Fiz.-Khim. Mech. Materialov 14, 50 (1978).Google Scholar
22Shchukin, E. D., Vestnik AN SSSR 11, 30 (1973).Google Scholar