Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T08:35:43.046Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Electrical Conductivity of Open-cell Metal Foams

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

K. P. Dharmasena  and
H. N. G. Wadley
K. P. Dharmasena
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22903
H. N. G. Wadley
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22903
Get access

Abstract

Cellular metal foams are of interest because of the ability to tailor their mechanical, thermal, acoustic, and electrical properties by varying the relative density and cell morphology. Here, a tetrakaidecahedral unit-cell approach is used to represent an open-cell aluminum foam and a simplified electrical resistor network derived to model low frequency current flow through the foam. The analysis indicates that for the range of relative densities studied (4–12%), the conductivity of tetrakaidecahedral foams has a linear dependence upon relative density. The distribution of metal in the cell ligaments was found to significantly affect the conductivity. Increasing the fraction of metal at the ends of the ligaments resulted in a decrease in electrical conductivity at a fixed relative density. Low frequency electrical conductivity measurements of an open-cell aluminum foam (ERG Duocel) confirmed the linear dependence upon density, but the slope was smaller than that predicted by the unit-cell model. The difference between the model and experiment was found to be the result of the presence of a distribution of cell sizes and types in real samples. This effect is due to the varying number of ligaments, ligament lengths, and the cross-sectional areas available for current conduction across the cellular structure.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 17 , Issue 3 , March 2002 , pp. 625 - 631
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashby, M.F., Evans, A.G., Fleck, N.A., Gibson, L.J., Hutchinson, J.W., and Wadley, H.N.G., Metal Foams: A Design Guide (Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, MA, 2000).Google Scholar
Evans, A.G., Hutchinson, J.W., and Ashby, M.F., Harvard University, Report MECH-323 (1998).Google Scholar
Shapovalov, V., MRS Bull. 19(4), 24 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, G.J. and Zhen, S., J. Mater. Sci. 18, 1899 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mepura Data Sheet Metallpulvergesellschaft m.b.H., Randshofern, Austria (1995).Google Scholar
Langlois, S. and Coeuret, F., J. Appl. Electrochem. 19, 43 (1989).Google Scholar
Dharmasena, K.P. and Wadley, H.N.G., in Porous and Cellular Materials for Structural Applications, edited by Schwartz, D.S., Shih, D.S., Evans, A.G., and Wadley, H.N.G. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 521, Warrendale, PA, 1998), pp. 171–176.Google Scholar
Metals Handbook, Desk edition, edited by Boyer, H.E. and Gall, T.L.. (American Society for Metals, Metals Park, OH, 1985), pp. 6–32.Google Scholar
Kraynik, A.M., Neilsen, M.K., Reinelt, D.A., and Warren, W.E., in Foams and Emulsions, edited by Sadoc, J.F. and Rivier, N. (Kluwer, Boston, 1999) pp. 259–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar