Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T02:31:26.363Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dynamic nanomechanical response of nacre

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2006

Bedabibhas Mohanty
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Engineering, North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota 58105
Kalpana S. Katti*
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Engineering, North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota 58105
Dinesh R. Katti
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Engineering, North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota 58105
Devendra Verma
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Engineering, North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota 58105
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: Kalpana.Katti@ndsu.edu
Get access

Abstract

Nacre, the shiny inner layer of mollusk shells is a model biomimetic nanocomposite system. Its exceptional mechanical properties have been the inspiration for materials scientists for several decades. Nacre exhibits a layered brick and mortar structure. It is composed of 95% inorganic (aragonitic CaCO3) phase and 5% organic (mainly proteins and polysaccharides) phase that are arranged in interlocked brick and mortar architecture with the mineral as bricks and organics as the mortar. In the current work, we describe the dynamic nanomechanical behavior of nacre using dynamic nanoindentation (nano-DMA) experiments. Two sets of loads were applied to obtain the dynamic response from varying depths in nacre. These tests were performed at three different frequencies (25, 50, and 100 Hz) to study the effect of frequency on the dynamic properties of nacre. The loss modulus (E″) and the loss factor (tan δ) were measured. Both of these parameters were observed to increase with increase in depth. Significant increase in tan δ was observed with the increase in frequency. Photoacoustic Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic studies on nacre indicate the presence of water in nacre. This water may be present at nanograin interfaces in nacre platelets, at organic–inorganic interfaces, and also in the organic phase in nacre. We believe that water is one of the significant contributors to the viscoelasticity of nacre. Our results indicate that the aragonite platelets in nacre may also contribute to viscoelasticity.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Currey, J.D.: Mechanical properties of mother of pearl in tension. Proc. R. Soc. London, B: Biol. Sci. 196, 443 (1977).Google Scholar
2.Jackson, A.P., Vincent, J.F.V., Turner, R.M.: The mechanical design of nacre. Proc. R. Soc. London, B: Biol. Sci. 234, 415 (1988).Google Scholar
3.Jackson, A.P., Vincent, J.F.V., Turner, R.M.: Comparison of nacre with other ceramic composites. J. Mater. Sci. 25, 3173 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Katti, K.S., Katti, D.R., Pradhan, S.M., Bhosle, A.: Platelet interlocks are the key to toughness and strength in nacre. J. Mater. Res. 20, 1097 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Currey, J.D. Mechanical properties of mollusc shell, in The Mechanical Properties of Biological Materials edited by Vincent, J.F.V. and Currey, J.D. (Cambridge University Press, London, UK, 1980) p. 75.Google Scholar
6.Yasrebi, M., Kim, G.M., Gunnison, K.E., Milius, D.L., Sarikaya, M., and Aksay, I.A.: Biomimetic processing of ceramics and ceramic-metal composites, in Better Ceramics Through Chemistry IV edited by Zelinski, B.J.J., Brinker, C.J., Clark, D.E., and Ulrich, D.R. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 180 Pittsburgh, PA, 1990), p. 625.Google Scholar
7.Sarikaya, M., Gunnison, K.E., Yasrebi, M., Milius, D.L., and Aksay, I.A.: Mechanical properties-microstructure relationships in Abalone shell, in Materials Synthesis Utilizing Biological Processes edited by Rieke, P.C., Calvert, P.D., and Alper, M. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 174, Pittsburgh, PA, 1990), p. 109.Google Scholar
8.Katti, D.R., Katti, K.S.: Modeling microarchitecture and mechanical behavior of nacre using 3D finite element techniques. J. Mater. Sci. 36, 1411 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Katti, D.R., Katti, K.S., Tang, J., and Sarikaya, M.: Effect of nanostructure in nacre: A multiscale modeling approach, in Proc. 15th ASCE Engineering Mechanics Conf. edited by Smyth, A. (ASCE, Reston, VA, 2002) p. 1.Google Scholar
10.Katti, D.R., Katti, K.S., Sopp, J.M., Sarikaya, M.: 3D finite element modeling of mechanical response in nacre-based hybrid nanocomposites. Comput. Theor. Polym. Sci. 11, 2485 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Katti, D.R., Pradhan, S.M., Katti, K.S.: Modeling the organic-inorganic interfacial nanoasperities in a model bio-nanocomposite, nacre. Rev. Adv. Mater. Sci. 6, 162 (2004).Google Scholar
12.Katti, K.S., Qian, M., Frech, D.W., Sarikaya, M.: Electron energy loss spectroscopy and dielectric functions of biological and geological polymorphs of CaCO3. Microsc. Microanal. 5, 358 (1999).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Verma, D., Katti, K.S., Katti, D.R.: Photoacoustic FTIR spectroscopic study of undisturbed nacre from red abalone. Spectrochim. Acta, Part A, 64, 1051 (2006).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Tabor, D.: The Hardness of Metals (Oxford, London, UK, 1951).Google Scholar
15.Pethica, J.B., Hutchings, R., Oliver, W.C.: Hardness measurement at penetration depths as small as 20 nm. Philos. Mag. A 48, 593 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Oliver, W.C., Pharr, G.M.: An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic-modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments. J. Mater. Res. 7, 1564 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Pethica, J.B., Oliver, W.C.: Tip surface interactions in STM and AFM. Phys. Scr. T19, 61 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Syed, S.A. Asif and Pethica, J.B.: Nano-scale viscoelastic properties of polymer materials, in Thin Films—Stresses and Mechanical Properties VII edited by Cammarata, R.C., Nastasi, M., Busso, E.P., and Oliver, W.C. (Mater. Res. Symp. Proc. 505, Warrendale, PA, 1998), p. 103.Google Scholar
19.Lee, C.S., Jho, J.Y., Choi, K., Hwang, T.W.: Dynamic mechanical behavior of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene irradiated with gamma rays. Macromol. Res. 12, 141 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Park, K., Mishra, S., Lewis, G., Losby, J., Fan, Z.F., Park, J.B.: Quasi-static and dynamic nanoindentation studies on highly crosslinked ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene. Biomaterials 25, 2427 (2004).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Li, X., Chang, W., Chao, Y.J., Wang, R., Chang, M.: Nanoscale structural and mechanical characterization of a natural nanocomposite material: The shell of red abalone. Nano Lett. 4, 613 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Bruet, B.J.F., Panas, R., Tai, K., Ortiz, C., Qi, H.J., Boyce, M.C.: Nanoscale morphology and indentation of individual nacre tablets from the gastropod mollusc Trochus Niloticus. J. Mater. Res. 20, 2400 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.McCrum, N.G., Buckley, C.P., Bucknall, C.B.: Principles of Polymer Engineering, 2nd ed. (Oxford Science Publications, Oxford University Press, London, UK, 1997).Google Scholar
24.Asif, S.A., Wahl, K.J., Colton, R.J.: Nanoindentation and contact stiffness measurement using force modulation with capacitive load-displacement transducer. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 70, 2408 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Urban, M.W.: Vibrational Spectroscopy of Molecules and Macromolecules on Surfaces (Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1993).Google Scholar
26.Rosencwaig, A.: Photoacoustics and Photoacoustic Spectroscopy (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1980).Google ScholarPubMed
27.Kramer, D.E., Volinsky, A.A., Moody, N.R., Gerberich, W.W.: Substrate effects on indentation plastic zone development in thin soft films. J. Mater. Res. 16, 3150 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28.Oaki, Y., Imai, H.: The hierarchical architecture of nacre and its mimetic material. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 44, 6571 (2005).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29.Yamashita, J., Furman, B.R., Rawls, H.R., Wang, X., Agrawal, C.M.: The use of dynamic mechanical analysis to assess the viscoelastic properties of human cortical bone. Biomed. Mater. Res. 58, 47 (2001).3.0.CO;2-U>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed