Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T12:29:54.124Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Crystallographic orientation and indenter radius effects on the onset of plasticity during nanoindentation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2012

Samantha K. Lawrence ,
David F. Bahr  and
Hussein M. Zbib
Samantha K. Lawrence
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99164-2920
David F. Bahr*
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99164-2920
Hussein M. Zbib
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99164-2920
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: dfbahr@purdue.edu
Get access

Abstract

The effect of crystallographic orientation and sample volume on incipient plasticity of commercially pure polycrystalline nickel 200 was investigated using electron back scatter diffraction (EBSD) and nanoindentation. A nickel sample was annealed, and grain orientations were determined using EBSD. Specifically oriented grains were indented using tips of nominal radii 100, 1000, and 1300 nm. The onset of plasticity in relatively defect-free small volumes is characterized by a sharp “pop-in” event during load-controlled nanoindentation. Grains in the (001) orientation yield at higher pressures; larger radii tips are more sensitive to orientation effects but yield at lower stresses. Subsurface defects may result in the dominance of tip radius over orientation, indicated by statistical analysis of yield points. An activation volume analysis, in conjunction with the yield pressure as a function of tip size, suggests that dislocation loops may play a critical role in causing these effects.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 27 , Issue 24 , 28 December 2012 , pp. 3058 - 3065
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Doerner, M.F. and Nix, W.D.: A method for interpreting the data from depth-sensing indentation instruments. J. Mater. Res. 1, 601–609 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, W.C. and Pharr, G.M.: Measurement of hardness and elastic modulus by instrumented indentation: Advances in understanding and refinement to methodology. J. Mater. Res. 19, 3–20 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venkataraman, S.K., Kohlstedt, D.L., and Gerberich, W.W.: Continuous microindentation of passivating surfaces. J. Mater. Res. 8, 685–688 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelchner, C.L., Plimpton, S.J., and Hamilton, J.C.: Dislocation nucleation and defect structure during surface indentation. Phys. Rev. B 58, 11085–11088 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuh, C.A. and Lund, A.C.: Application of nucleation theory to the rate dependence of incipient plasticity during nanoindentation. J. Mater. Res. 19, 2152–2158 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, T. and Li, J.: Ultra-strength materials. Prog. Mater. Sci. 55, 710–757 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, L., Morris, D.J., Jennerjohn, S.L., Bahr, D.F., and Levine, L.: Finite element analysis and experimental investigation of the Hertzian assumption on the characterization of initial plastic yield. J. Mater. Res. 24, 1059–1068 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minor, A.M., Ayed Asif, S.A., Shan, Z., Stach, E.A., Cyrankowski, E., Wyrobek, T.J., and Warren, O.L.: A new view of the onset of plasticity during the nanoindentation of aluminum. Nat. Mater. 5, 697–702 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bahr, D.F., Jennerjohn, S.L., and Morris, D.J.: Dislocation nucleation and multiplication in small volumes: The onset of plasticity during indentation testing. JOM 61(2), 56–60 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zbib, A.A. and Bahr, D.F.: Dislocation nucleation and source activation during nanoindentation yield points. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 38, 2249–2255 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuh, C.A., Mason, J.K., and Lund, A.C.: Quantitative insight into dislocation nucleation from high-temperature nanoindentation experiments. Nat. Mater. 4, 617–621 (2005).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Betteridge, W.: Nickel and Its Alloys (Ellis Horwood Ltd., West Sussex, England, 1984), p. 66.Google Scholar
Johnson, K.L.: Contact Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, L., Morris, D.J., Jennerjohn, S.L., Bahr, D.F., and Levine, L.: The role of probe shape on the initiation of metal plasticity in nanoindentation. Acta Mater. 60(12), 4729–4739 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corcoran, S.G., Colton, R.J., Lilleodden, E.T., and Gerberich, W.W.: Anomalous plastic deformation at surfaces: Nanoindentation of gold single crystals. Phys. Rev. B 55, 16057 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiely, J.D. and Houston, J.E.: Nanomechanical properties of Au (1 1 1), (0 0 1) and (1 1 0) surfaces. Phys. Rev. B 57(19), 12588–12594 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, W., Jiang, C.B., and Lu, K.: Deformation behavior of Ni3Al single crystals during nanoindentation. Acta Mater. 51, 6169–6180 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, T.L., Gao, Y.F., Bei, H., and George, E.P.: Indentation Schmid factor and orientation dependence of nanoindentation pop-in behavior of NiAl single crystals. J. Mech. Phys. Solids. 59, 1147–1162 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salehinia, I., Lawrence, S.K., and Bahr, D.F.: Acta Mater. (2012, submitted).Google Scholar
Salehinia, I., Perez, V., and Bahr, D.F.: Effect of vacancies on incipient plasticity during contact loading. Philos. Mag. 92(5), 550–570 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salehinia, I. and Bahr, D.F.: The impact of a variety of point defects on the inception of plastic deformation in dislocation free metals. Scr. Mater. 66, 339–342 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiedershich, H.: Hardening mechanisms and the theory of deformation. J. Met. 16, 425–430 (1954).Google Scholar
Wang, W., Zhong, Y., Lu, K., McDowell, D.L., and Zhu, T.: Size effects and strength fluctuations in nanoscale plasticity. Acta Mater. 60, 3302–3309 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorenz, D., Zeckzer, A., Hilpert, U., Grau, P., Johansen, H., and Leipner, H.S.: Pop-in effect as homogenous nucleation of dislocations during nanoindentation. Phys. Rev. B 67, 172101 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michalske, T.A. and Houston, J.E.: Dislocation nucleation at nano-scale contacts. Acta Mater. 46, 391 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bahr, D.F., Kramer, D.E., and Gerberich, W.W.: Non-linear deformation mechanisms during nanoindentation. Acta Mater. 46, 3605 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiu, Y.L. and Ngan, A.H.W.: Time-dependent characteristics of incipient plasticity in nanoindentation of a Ni3Al single crystal. Acta Mater. 50, 1599 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tymiak, N.I., Kramer, D.E., Bahr, D.F., Wyrobek, J.T., and Gerberich, W.W.: Plastic strain and strain gradients at very small indentation depths. Acta Mater. 49, 1021 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ngan, A.H.W., Zuo, L., and Wo, P.C.: Probabilistic nature of the nucleation of dislocations in an applied stress field. Scr. Mater. 54, 589 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: Image

Lawrence Supplementary Material

Appendix

Download Lawrence Supplementary Material(Image)
Image 24.4 MB