Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T06:10:26.990Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

CdS-sensitized single-crystalline TiO2 nanorods and polycrystalline nanotubes for solar hydrogen generation – ERRATUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 March 2013

Abstract

Type
Erratum
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2013

doi: 10.1557/jmr.2012.373, Published by Cambridge University Press, 19 November 2012.

In Shaislamov et al.Reference Shaislamov and Yang1, Figs. 3 and 4 are misrepresented. Correct representations are displayed below

FIG. 3. Photocurrent measurement results of the TiO2 nanostructured photoanodes. (a) and (b) show photocurrent response of the bare TiO2, CdS/TiO2, and CdS/TiO2 after heat treatment anodes under white (a) and visible light (b). (c) and (d) are photocurrent of TiO2 nanotubes under white and visible light irradiation, respectively.

FIG. 4. IPCE results of TNRs (a) and nanotubes (b) before and after CdS sensitization. (c) Hydrogen evolution rates for CdS-sensitized nanorods and nanotubes.

The publisher regrets the error.

References

REFERENCE

Shaislamov, Ulugbek and Yang, Bee Lyong: CdS-sensitized single-crystalline TiO2 nanorods and polycrystalline nanotubes for solar hydrogen generation. J. Mater. Res. 28(3), 497501 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

FIG. 3. Photocurrent measurement results of the TiO2 nanostructured photoanodes. (a) and (b) show photocurrent response of the bare TiO2, CdS/TiO2, and CdS/TiO2 after heat treatment anodes under white (a) and visible light (b). (c) and (d) are photocurrent of TiO2 nanotubes under white and visible light irradiation, respectively.

Figure 1

FIG. 4. IPCE results of TNRs (a) and nanotubes (b) before and after CdS sensitization. (c) Hydrogen evolution rates for CdS-sensitized nanorods and nanotubes.