Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T16:31:59.521Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Abrasion of Al2O3–SiC–(Al, Si) composites made by melt oxidation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2012

R. Arvind Singh ,
V. Jayaram  and
S. K. Biswas
R. Arvind Singh
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560 012, India
V. Jayaram
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgy, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560 012, India
S. K. Biswas
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560 012, India
Get access

Extract

We report here the remarkable abrasion wear resistance (normal pressure: 2.92 to 5.42 MPa; sliding speed: 0.25 to 3 m/s) of a soft (relative to other structural ceramics) melt-oxidized ceramic matrix composite Al2O3 –SiC–(Al, Si). In spite of being half as hard and more porous than zirconia toughened alumina (ZTA), a common cutting tool material, this composite fabricated at 1100 °C shows wear resistance comparable to that of ZTA at sliding speeds more than 2 m/s. The ability of this composite to generate a metal-rich tribofilm when rubbed and its high thermal shock resistance are factors which may be responsible for this unique performance.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , January 1999 , pp. 64 - 67
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Newkirk, M. S., Urquhart, A. W., Zwicker, H. R., and Breval, E., J. Mater. Res. 1, 81 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Manor, E., Ni, H., Levi, C. G., and Mehrabian, R., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 76, 1777 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Dhandapani, S. P., Jayaram, V., and Surappa, M. K., Acta Metall. Mater. 42, 649 (1994).Google Scholar
4.Kern, W. A., McNallan, M. J., and Tressler, R. E., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 79 (7), 1881–1891 (1996).Google Scholar
5.Jayaram, V., Manna, R., Kshetrapal, M. G., Sarkar, J., and Biswas, S. K., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 79 (3), 770–772 (1996).Google Scholar
6.Ravikiran, A., Jayaram, V., and Biswas, S. K., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 80, 219–224 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Dwivedi, R. K., Ceram. Eng. Sci. Proc. 12 (9–10), 2203 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Sternitzke, M., Knechtel, M., Hoffman, M., Broszeit, E., and Rodel, J., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 79 (1), 121–128 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Blomberg, A., Olsson, M., and Hogmark, S., Wear 171, 77–89 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Denape, J. and Lamon, J., J. Mater. Sci. 25, 3592–3604 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Bowden, F. P. and Tabor, D., The Friction and Lubrication of Solids, Part I (Clarendon Press, Oxford, England, 1953), p. 143.Google Scholar