Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T23:25:38.253Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A (001) x-ray diffraction study of stage 1 α and β phases of graphite-CsBix

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Ming Hong Yang
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40506
Peter C. Eklund
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40506
Get access

Abstract

Results are reported of (00l) x-ray studies of the α(Ic = 10.65 Å) and β(Ic = 11.49 Å) phases of stage 1 graphite-CsBix ternary intercalation compounds that are air stable. The integrated intensities of the (OOl) x-ray lines are analyzed in terms of a centrosymmetric sandwich model that consists of two laycrs each of Cs, Bi, and C. The results of these analyses indicate that the Bi layers are nearly centered in the cell as Suggested by Lagrange et al. [Synth. Met. 12, 201 (1985)]. Furthermore, stoichiometries of the α and β phases are found to be Cs0.99 Bi0.43C4 and Cs0.83Bi0.81C4, respectively. The β phase is found to contain nearly twice as many Bi atoms'. The sample mass change upon intercalation is in good agreement with the x-ray analyses. The substantial difference in the Bi concentration in the α and β phases would be expected to have strong influence on the superconducting properties of these graphite intercalation compounds (GIC's).

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Lagrange, P., Bendriss-Rerhrhaye, A., Mareche, J. F., and McRae, E., Synth. Met. 12, 201 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Yang, M. H., Eklund, P. C., and Kamitakahara, W. A., Extended Abstracts: Graphite Intercalation Compounds, edited by Eklund, P. C., Dresselhaus, M. S., and Dresselhaus, G. (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA, 1984), p. 127.Google Scholar
3Kamitakara, W. A., DeLong, L. E., Eklund, P. C., and Nicklow, R. M., Phys. Rev. B 29, 460 (1984); H. J. Kim, H. Mertway, T. Kach, J. E. Fischer, D. B. McWhan, and J. D. Axe, ibid. 29, 5947 (1984).Google Scholar
4Yang, M. H. and Eklund, P. C. (to be published).Google Scholar
5Yang, M. H. and Eklund, P. C. (to be published).Google Scholar
6Moore, A. W., Chemistry and Physics of Carbon, edited by Walker, P. L. and Thrower, P. A. (Dekker, New York, 1973), Vol. 11, p. 69.Google Scholar
7Cullity, B. D., Elements of X-ray Diffraction (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1956), p. 190.Google Scholar
8Reference 7, p. 117.Google Scholar
9International Table for X-Ray Crystallography, edited by Ibers, J. A. and Hamilton, W. C. (Kynoch, Birmingham, England, 1974), Vol. 4, p. 72.Google Scholar
10Leung, S. Y., Dresselhaus, M. S., Underhill, C., Krapchev, T., Dresselhaus, G., and Wuensch, B. J., Phys. Rev. B 24, 3505 (1981).Google Scholar
11Chen, R. and Trucano, P., Acta Crystallogr. A 33, 823 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Lenge's Handbook of Chemistry, edited by Dean, John A. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1985), pp. 3122.Google Scholar