Skip to main content Accessibility help

The relationship between innovation and performance in special nonprofit firms: Social and cooperative agrifood firms

  • Hsing Hung Chen (a1), Amy H I Lee (a2) and Jack Chen (a3)


Firms are continually trying to identify innovation sources in order to improve organizational performance, but the identification of such origins is a complex and poorly understood issue, particularly as far as nonprofit firms are concerned. The social and cooperative agrifood arrangement has become one of the main and newest types of nonprofit organization in China since the implementation of the law related to specialized cooperatives, on July 1, 2007. In this research, a conceptual model is proposed to show that the characteristics of innovative sources can determine a firm’s absorptive capacity, which in turn can impact its performance. Therefore, absorptive capacity can be expected to enable the mediation of the relationships of innovative sources with the performance of firms. By means of theoretical analysis and practical investigation, this paper provides an assessment of the use of innovation sources and finds critical factors that may foster competitive and sustainable advantages.


Corresponding author

Corresponding author:


Hide All
Abecassis-Moedas, C., & Mahmoud-Jouini, S. B. (2008). Absorptive capacity and source-recipient complementality in designing new products: An empirically derived framework. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25, 473490.
Arbuckle, J. L. (2007). AMOS 16.0 user’s guide. Spring House, PA: AMOS Development Corp.
Bryant, A., & Koksarova, J. (2010). Transforming a nonprofit work environment for creativity. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 21(1), 7792.
Castro, G. M. (2015). Knowledge management and innovation in knowledge-based and high-tech industrial markets: The role of openness and absorptive capacity. Industrial Marketing Management, 47, 143146.
Chinanews. (2015). Current news related to the development of special nonprofit firms: Social and cooperative agrifood firms in China. Retrieved from
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128152.
Emden, Z., Calantone, R. J., & Droge, C. (2006). Collaborating for new product development: Selecting the partner with maximum potential to create value. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23, 330341.
Fernanda, R. (2014). The use of archives as a means of organization, representation and retrieval of information. Knowledge Organization, 41(4), 319326.
Filippetti, A., & Archibugi, D. (2011). Innovation in times of crisis: National systems of innovation, structure, and demand. Research Policy, 40, 179192.
Fornell, C., & Larker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(February), 3950.
Fredette, C., & Bradshaw, P. (2012). Social capital and nonprofit governance effectiveness. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 22(4), 391409.
Freeman, R. E. (1999). Divergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review, 24, 233236.
Gallie, D. (2007). Employment regimes and the quality of work. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Gatignon, H., & Xuereb, J. M. (1997). Strategic orientation of the firm and new product performance. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(1), 7790.
George, G., Zahra, S. A., Wheatley, K. K., & Khan, R. (2001). The effects of alliance portfolio characteristics and absorptive capacity on performance: A study of biotechnology firms. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 12, 205226.
Gholizadeh, H., Bonyadi Naeini, A., & Moini, A. (2015). Proposing a model for absorption capacity of technology. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 4(1), 113124.
Greenwood, R., & Hinings, C. R. (2006). Understanding radical organizational change: Bringing together the old and the new institutionalism. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 10221054.
Guzman, I., & Arcas, N. (2008). The usefulness of accounting information in the measurement of technical efficiency in agricultural cooperatives. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 79(1), 107131.
Hienerth, C., & Lettl, C. (2015). Exploring new peer communities enable lead user innovations to become standard equipment in the industry. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(S1), 175195.
Hill, C. W. L., & Jones, G. R. (2007). Strategic management: An integrated approach. USA: Houghton Mifflin.
Huang, K.-F., Lin, K. H., Wua, L. Y., & Yu, P. H. (2015). Absorptive capacity and autonomous R&D climate roles in firm innovation. Journal of Business Research, 68, 8794.
International Cooperative Alliance. (2010). Current news related to the development of special nonprofit firms: Social and cooperative agrifood firms in international countries. Retrieved from
Ish, D., Tyrner, B., & Fulton, M. (2006). International seminar on legislation for farmer co-operatives in China: A Canadian perspective (pp. 1–16). Saskatoon, Canada: Centre for the Study of Co-operatives, University of Saskatchewan. Retrieved from FarmerCoopsChina.pdf.
Jaskyte, K. (2014). Boards of directors and innovation in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 22(4), 439459.
Jones, T. M., Felps, W., & Bigley, G. A. (2013). Ethical theory and stakeholder-related decisions: The role of stakeholder culture. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 137155.
Kim, C. W., & Mauborgne, R. (1997). Value innovation: The strategic logic of high growth. Harvard Business Review, January–February, 102115.
Kim, L. (1998). Crisis construction and organizational learning: Capability building in catching-up at Hyundai Motor. Organization Science, 9, 506521.
Leana, C. R., & Pil, F. K. (2006). Social capital and organizational performance: Evidence from urban public schools. Organization Science, 17(3), 353366.
Lybbert, T. J., & Sumner, D. A. (2012). Agricultural technologies for climate change in developing countries: Policy options for innovation and technology diffusion. Food Policy, 37, 114123.
Maclndoe, H., & Barman, E. (2014). How organizational stakeholders shape performance measurement in nonprofits: Exploring a multidimensional measure. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39(3), 416431.
McAdam, M., McAdam, R., Dunn, A., & McCall, C. (2015). Regional horizontal networks within the SME agri-food sector: An innovation and social network perspective. Regional Studies, 52(8), 114.
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. America Journal of Sociology, 83, 340363.
Nair, N., & Bhatnagar, D. (2015). Understanding workplace deviant behavior in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 21(3), 289309.
Narver, J. C., & Slater, S. F. (1990). The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. Journal of Marketing, 54(4), 2035.
NFPL. (2009). The international center for not-for-profit law, FAQ: What is the difference between non-profit and not-for-profit? Retrieved from, 2009.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Olson, E. M., Slater, S. F., & Hult, T. M. (2005). The performance implications of fit among business strategy, marketing organization structure and strategic behavior. Journal of Marketing, 69, 4965.
O’Sullian, A., & Sheffrin, S. M. (2003). Economics: Principles in action. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Pavia, T. M. (1991). The early stages of new product development in entrepreneurial high-tech firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 8(1), 1831.
Ritala, P., & Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, P. (2013). Incremental and radical innovation in cooperation – The role of absorptive capacity and appropriability. Journal of Product Innovation management, 30(1), 154169.
Robbins, S. P., & DeCenzo, D. A. (2007). Fundamentals of management: Essential concepts and applications. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
SFC. (2007). The law of specialized farmers cooperatives (SFC) in China, The Department of Agriculture, China.
Spear, S., & Bowen, H.K. (1999). Decoding the DNA of the Toyota production system. Harvard Business Review, September–October, 97106.
Spithoven, A., Frantzen, D., & Clarysse, B. (2010). Heterogeneous firm-level effects of knowledge exchanges on product innovation: Differences between dynamic and lagging product innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27, 362381.
Streiner, D. L. (2003). Being inconsistent about consistency: When coefficient alpha does and doesn't matter. Journal of Personality Assessment, 80(3), 217222.
Tangpong, C., & Pesek, J. G. (2007). Shareholder value ideology, reciprocity and decision making in moral dilemmas. Journal of Managerial Issues, 19(3), 379396.
Troy, L. C., Szymanski, D. M., & Varadarajan, R. P. (2001). Generating new product ideas: An initial investigation of the role of market information and organizational characteristics. Academy of Marketing Science, 29(1), 89101.
Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2000). Absorptive capacity: A review and conceptualization. Best Paper Proceedings of the Academy of Management National Meeting, Toronto.
Zahra, S. A., & Hayton, J. C. (2008). The effect of international venturing on firm performance: The moderating influence of absorptive capacity. Journal of Business Venturing, 23, 195220.
Zhang, H. I. (2010). Summarized experiences after the execution of the law of specialized farmers cooperatives. Journal of Agriculture Foods, 23, 6166. (in Chinese version).
Zhang, J., Baden-Fuller, C., & Nangematin, V. (2013). Technological knowledge base, R&D organization structure and alliance formation: Evidence from the biopharmaceutical industry. Research Policy, 36, 515528.
Zhao, K. Y., & Wu, S. N. (2014). The network pattern of journal knowledge transfer in library and information science in China. Knowledge Organization, 41(4), 276287.
Zilber, T. B. (2002). Institutionalization as interplay between actions, meaning, and actors: The case of a rape crisis center in Israel. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 234254.


The relationship between innovation and performance in special nonprofit firms: Social and cooperative agrifood firms

  • Hsing Hung Chen (a1), Amy H I Lee (a2) and Jack Chen (a3)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed