Annells, M. (1996). Hermeneutic phenomenology: Philosophical perspectives and current use in nursing research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 23, 705–713.
Asch, D., & Salaman, G. (2002). The challenge of change. European Business Journal, 14(3), 133–143.
Baghai, M. A., Everingham, B., & White, D. (2000). Growth down under. The Mckinsey Quarterly, 1, 12–14.
Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2003). Exploitation, exploration, & process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 238–256.
Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Davis, J. P., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Bingham, C. B. (2009). Optimal structure, market dynamism, and the strategy of simple rule. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54, 413–452.
Daymon, C., & Holloway, I. (2002). Qualitative research methods in public relations and marketing communications. London: Routledge.
Deetz, S. (1996). Describing differences in approaches to organization science: Rethinking Burrell and Morgan and their legacy. Organization Science, 7(2), 191–207.
Denis, J.-L., Lamothe, L., & Langley, A. (2001). The dynamics of collective leadership and strategic change in pluralistic organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 809–837.
De Vault, M. L. (1995). Ethnicity and expertise: Racial-ethnic knowledge in sociological research. Gender and Society, 9(5), 612–631.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532–550.
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Brown, S. L. (1998). Competing on the edge: Strategy as structured chaos. Long Range Planning, 31(5), 786–789.
Evans, P. (1999). HRM on the edge: A duality perspective. Organization, 6(2), 325–338.
Farjoun, M. (2010). Beyond dualism: Stability and change as a duality. Academy of Management Review, 35(2), 202–225.
Farquhar, J. D. (2012). Case study research for business. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Fetterman, D. M. (1989). Ethnography: Step by step (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Galvin, P. (2014). A new vision for the journal of management & organization: The role of context. Journal of Management & Organization, 20(1), 1–5.
Ghoshal, S., & Bartlett, C. A. (1995). Building the entrepreneurial corporation: New organizational processes, new managerial tasks. European Management Journal, 13(2), 139–155.
Gillham, B. (2000a). Case study research methods. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
Gillham, B. (2000b). Developing questionnaires. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
Glaser, B. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing Co.
Graetz, F., & Smith, A. (2008). The role of dualities in arbitrating continuity and change in forms of organizing. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10(3), 265–280.
Graetz, F., & Smith, A. (2011). Duality theory and the management of the change-stability paradox. Journal of Management and Organization, 17(4), 534–547.
Groysberg, B., & Lee, L.-E. (2009). Hiring stars and their colleagues: Exploration and exploitation in professional service firms. Organization Science, 20(4), 740–758.
Hammersley, M. (1989). The dilemma of qualitative method. London: Routledge.
Isabella, L. A. (1990). Evolving interpretations as change unfolds: How managers construe key organizational events. Academy of Management Journal, 33(1), 7–41.
Jackson, P., & Harris, L. (2003). E-business and organizational change: Reconciling traditional values with business transformation. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 16(5s), 497–511.
Jansen, J. J. P., Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science, 52(11), 1661–1674.
Jennings, G. (2001). Tourism research. Milton, Australia: John Wiley & Sons.
Leana, C. R., & Barry, B. (2000). Stability and change as simultaneous experiences in organizational life. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 753–759.
Lewin, A. Y., Long, C., & Carroll, T. (1999). The coevolution of new organizational forms. Organization Science, 10(5), 535–550.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Lubatkin, M. H., Simsek, Z., Ling, Y., & Veiga, J. F. (2006). Ambidexterity and performance in small-to-medium-sized firms. Journal of Management, 32, 646–672.
Luscher, L. S., & Lewis, M. E. (2008). Organizational change and managerial sensemaking: Working through paradox. Academy of Management Journal, 51(2), 221–240.
Miles, M., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Minichiello, V., Aroni, R., & Hays, T. (2008). In-depth interviewing (3rd ed.). New York: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
Moore, G. A. (2007). To succeed in the long term, focus on the middle term. Harvard Business Review, 8(7–8), 2–8.
O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2004). The ambidextrous organization. Harvard Business Review, 82(4), 74–81.
Pettigrew, S. (2000). Ethnography and grounded theory: A happy marriage?
Advances in consumer research, 27, 256–260.
Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G., & Tushman, M. L. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organization Science, 20(4), 685–695.
Rindova, V. P., & Kotha, S. (2001). Continuous ‘morphing’: Competing through dynamic capabilities, form, and function. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 1263–1280.
Seo, M. G., Putnam, L. L., & Bartunek, J. M. (2004). Dualities and tensions of planned organizational change. In Poole M. S., & Van De Ven A. H. (Eds.), Handbook of organizational change and innovation (pp. 73–107). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Smith, W., & Lewis, M. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36, 381–403.
Smith, W. K., & Tushman, M. L. (2005). Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organization Science, 16(5), 522–536.
Sjoberg, G., Williams, N., Vaughan, T. R., & Sjoberg, A. F. (1991). The case study approach in social research. In Feagin, J. R., Orum, A. M., & Sjoberg, G. (Eds.), A case for the case study (pp. 27–79). Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
Strauss, A. (1995). Notes on the nature and development of general theories. Qualitative Inquiry, 1(1), 7–18.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology. In Denzin N. K., & Lincoln Y. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 273–285). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Suddaby, R. (2006). What grounded theory is not. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 633–642.
Taylor, A., & Helfat, C. E. (2009). Organizational linkages for surviving technical change: Complementary assets, middle management, and ambidexterity. Organization Science, 20(4), 718–739.
Tushman, M., Smith, W. K., Chapman Wood, R., Westerman, G., & O’Reilly, C. A. (2010). Organizational designs and innovation streams. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(5), 1331–1366.
Tushman, M., Lakhani, K., & Lifshitz-Assaf, H. (2012). Open innovation and organizational design. Journal of Organizational Design, 1(1), 24–27.
Volberda, H. W. (1998). Building the flexible firm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Whiteley, A. M. (2004). Grounded research: A modified grounded theory for the business setting. Qualitative Research Journal, 4(2), 27–47.
Whittington, R., & Pettigrew, A. M. (2003). Complementarities thinking. In Pettigrew A. M., Whittington R. L., Melin L., Sanchez-Runde C., Van Den Bosch F. A. J., Ruigrok W., & Numagami T. (Eds.), Innovative forms of organizing (pp. 125–132). London: Sage.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research – Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.