Skip to main content Accessibility help

An empirical examination of the emergence of collective psychological ownership in work team contexts

  • Jon L. Pierce (a1), Dahui Li (a1), Iiro Jussila (a2) and Jianyou Wang (a3)


As work teams have increasingly become the cornerstone of the post bureaucratic organization, there have been calls for a greater understanding of collective thought and action. Such understanding is deemed important for the design and management of teamwork. Theory suggests that feelings of ownership manifest themselves at the collective level, and positively affect team performance effectiveness. This study illuminates the role played by teamwork complexity and team self-management in the emergence of the psychological processes that are associated with the manifestation of job-focused collective psychological ownership (CPO). In addition, employment of serial mediation suggests that both teamwork dimensions put employees on two routes (intimate knowing of and the collective investment of the team members' selves into the job) that lead to the emergence of a collective sense of ownership, and together these two route variables and CPO sequentially mediated a positive relationship between teamwork design and team performance effectiveness.


Corresponding author

*Corresponding author. Email:


Hide All
Altman, I. (1975). The environment and social behavior: Privacy, personal space, territory and crowding. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Henry Holt & Co.
Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15, 159216.
Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In Klein, K. J. & Kozlowski, S. W. (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp. 349381). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Brislin, R. W. (1980). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1, 185216.
Brown, G., & Crossley, C. (2008). What about psychological ownership and territoriality? Questions we are starting to ask. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Los Angeles, CA.
Brown, G., Pierce, J. L., & Crossley, C. (2014). Toward an understanding of the development of ownership feelings. Journal Organizational Behavior, 35, 318338. doi: 10.1002/job.1869.
Campion, M. A., Papper, E. M., & Medsker, G. J. (1996). Relations between work team characteristics and effectiveness: A replication and extension. Personnel Psychology, 49, 429452.
Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Salas, E., & Converse, S. (1993). Shared mental models in expert team decision making. In Castellan, N. J. (Ed.), Individual and group decision making (pp. 221245). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Carron, A. V., & Spink, K. S. (1995). The group-size cohesion relationship in minimal groups. Small Group Research, 26, 86105. doi: 10.1177/104649649561005.
Chan, D. (1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of comparison models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 234246.
Cooke, N. J. (2015). Team cognition as interaction. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 415419. doi: 10.1177/0963721415602474.
Cooney, R. (2004). Empowered self-management and the design of work teams. Personnel Review, 33, 677692. doi: 10/1108/00483480410561556.
Cram, F., & Paton, H. (1993). Personal possessions and self-identity: The experiences of elderly women in three residential settings. Australian Journal of Aging, 12, 1924.
Devine, D. J., Clayton, L. D., Philips, J. L., Dunford, B. B., & Mehner, S. B. (1999). Teams in organizations: Prevalence, characteristics, and effectiveness. Small Group Research, 30, 678711.
Dipboye, R. L. (1977). A critical review of Korman's self-consistency theory of work motivation and occupational choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 18, 108126.
Dittmar, H. (1992). The social psychology of material possessions: To have is to be. New York: St. Martin's Press.
Dunham, R. B. (1976). The measurement and dimensionality of job characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 404409.
Forsyth, D. R. (2010). Components of cohesion. In Group dynamics (5th ed., pp. 118122). Wadsworth: Cengage Learning.
Gibson, B. G. (2001). From knowledge accumulation to accommodation: Cycles of collective cognition in work groups. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 121134.
Gibson, B. G., & Earley, C. P. (2007). Collective cognition in action: Accumulation, interaction, examination, and recommendation in the development and operation of group efficacy beliefs in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 32, 438458.
Glick, W. H. (1985). Conceptualizing and measuring organizational and psychological climate: Pitfalls in multilevel research. Academy of Management Review, 10, 601616.
Goodwin, J., Jasper, J. M., & Poletta, F. (2000). The return of the repressed: The fall and rise of emotions in social movement theory. Mobilization, 5, 6583.
Grand, J. A., Braun, M. T., Kuljamin, G., Koslowski, S. W. J., & Chao, G. T. (2016). The dynamics of team cognition: A process-oriented theory of knowledge emergence in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101, 13531386. doi: org/10.1037/ap1000136.
Grant, A. M., Fried, Y., & Juillerat, T. (2011). Work matters: Job design in classic and contemporary perspectives. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 417453). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.
Hackman, J. R. (1987). The design of work teams. In Lorsch, J. W. (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 315342). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975). Development of the Job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 159170.
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Gilford Press.
Heino, N., Tuominen, P., Tuominen, T., & Jussila, I. (2018). The socio-psychological challenges of succession in family firms: The implications of collective psychological ownership. In E. Menili & C. Dibrell (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of heterogeneity among family firms (pp. 715746). Palgrave.
Idaszak, J. R., & Drasgow, F. (1987). A revision of the Job diagnostic survey: Elimination of a measurement artifact. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 6974.
James, L. R. (1982). Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreements. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 8598.
James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 219229.
James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1993). An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 306309.
James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York: Holt.
Ji, L.-J., Peng, K., & Nisbett, R. E. (2000). Culture, control, and perception of relationships in the environment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 943955. doi: 10.11037/0022-3514.78-5943.
Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley.
Kirkman, B. L., & Rosen, B. (1999). Beyond self-management, antecedents and consequences of team empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 19982000. doi: 10.1177/0021886313479998.
Klimoski, R., & Mohammed, S. (1994). Team mental model: Construct or metaphor. Journal of Management, 20, 403437. doi: org/10.1016/0149-2063(94)90021-3.
Korman, A. H. (1971). Organizational achievement, aggression and creativity: Some suggestions toward an integrated theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 6, 593613.
Korman, A. H. (1976). Hypothesis of work behavior revisited and an extension. Academy of Management Review, 1, 5063. doi: 10.5465/AMR.1976.4408762.
Korman, A. H. (2001). Self-enhancement and self-protection: Toward a theory of work motivation. In Erez, M., Kleinbeck, U., & Thierry, H. (Eds.), Work motivation in the context of a globalizing economy (pp. 121130). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associations, Inc.
Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Chao, G. T. (2012). The dynamics of emergence: Cognition and cohesion in work teams. Managerial and Decision Economics, 33, 335354. doi: 10.1002/mde.2552.
Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Klein, K. J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In Klein, K. J. and Kozlowski, S. W. J. (Eds.), Multilevel theory research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 390). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
LeBreton, J. M., & Senter, J. L. (2008). Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 815852. doi: 10.1177/1094428106296642.
Ley, D., & Cybriwsky, R. (1974). Urban graffiti as territorial markers. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 64, 491505.
Lim, B., & Klein, K. (2006). Team mental models and team performance: A field study of the effects of team mental model similarity and accuracy. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 403. doi: /10.1002/job.387.
Lim, B.-C., & Ployhart, R. E. (2004). Transformational leadership: Relations to the five-factor model and team performance in typical and maximum contexts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 610621. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.4.610.
Mathieu, J. E., Heffner, T. S., Goodwin, G. F., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2000). The influence of shared mental models on team processes and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 273283. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.85.2.273.
Mathieu, J. E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Kukenberger, M. R., Donsbach, J. S., & Alliger, G. M. (2015). Team role experiences and orientation: A measure and tests of construct validity. Group & Organization Management, 40, 634. doi: 10.1177/105960114562000.
Morgeson, F. P., & Hofmann, D. A. (1999). The structure and function of collective constructs: Implications for multilevel research and theory development. Academy of Management Review, 24, 249265.
Morgeson, F. P., & Humphrey, S. E. (2006). The work design questionnaire (WDQ): Developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 13211339. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1321.
Peng, H., & Pierce, J. L. (2015). Job- and organization-based psychological ownership: Relationship and outcomes. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 30(1), 151168. doi: 10.1108j.p07-2012-0201.
Piccolo, R. F., & Colquitt, J. A. (2006). Transformational leadership and job behaviors: The mediating role of core job characteristics. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 327340. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2006.20786079.
Pierce, J. L., & Jussila, I. (2010). Collective psychological ownership within the work and organizational context: Construct introduction and elaboration. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 810834. doi: 10.1002/job.628.
Pierce, J. L., Jussila, I., & Li, D. (2018). Development and validation of an instrument for assessing collective psychological ownership in organizational field settings. Journal of Management & Organization, 24, 776792.
Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. T. (2003). The state of psychological ownership: Integrating and extending a century of research. Review of General Psychology, 7, 84107. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680-7.1.84.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879903. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717731. doi: 10.3758/BRM.40.3.879.
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879891.
Quinteiro, P. M., Passos, A., & Curral, L. (2016). Though self-leadership and effectiveness in self-management teams. Leadership, 12(1), 110126.
Rantanen, N., & Jussila, I. (2011). F-CPO: A collective psychological ownership approach to capturing realized family influence on business. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 2, 139150.
Rousseau, V., & Aube, C. (2010). Team self-management behaviors and team effectiveness: The moderating effect of task routineness. Group & Organization Management, 35, 751781. doi: 10.1177/105960110390835.
Seligman, M. E. P. (1975). Helpleness. San Francisco: Freeman.
Shalley, C. F., Gilson, L. L., & Blum, T. (2009). Interactive effects of growth need strength, work context, and job complexity on self-reported creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 489505.
Swann, W. B., Johnson, R. E., & Bosson, J. L. (2009). Identity negotiation at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 29, 81109.
Tata, J., & Prasad, S. (2004). Team self-management, organizational structure, and judgments of team effectiveness. Journal of Management Issues, XVI(2), 248265.
Tetrick, L. E., & LaRocco, J. M. (1987). Understanding, prediction, and control as moderators of the relationship between perceived stress, satisfaction and psychological well-being. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 538543.
Thrasher, F. M. (1927). The gang. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Wageman, R., Hackman, J. R., & Lehman, E. (2005). Team diagnostic survey: Development of an instrument. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 41, 125. doi: 10.1077/002186305281984.
Weick, K. E., & Roberts, K. H. (1993). Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 357–181.
Yablonsky, L. (1962). The violent gang. New York: Macmillan.
Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 97206. doi: 10.1086/651257.


An empirical examination of the emergence of collective psychological ownership in work team contexts

  • Jon L. Pierce (a1), Dahui Li (a1), Iiro Jussila (a2) and Jianyou Wang (a3)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed