Hostname: page-component-f7d5f74f5-cz72t Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-10-04T14:41:34.046Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "corePageComponentGetUserInfoFromSharedSession": true, "coreDisableEcommerce": false, "coreDisableSocialShare": false, "coreDisableEcommerceForArticlePurchase": false, "coreDisableEcommerceForBookPurchase": false, "coreDisableEcommerceForElementPurchase": false, "coreUseNewShare": true, "useRatesEcommerce": true } hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Managing unethical behavior in organizations: The need for a behavioral business ethics approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2016

David De Cremer  and
Wim Vandekerckhove
David De Cremer*
Affiliation:
Judge Business School, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
Wim Vandekerckhove
Affiliation:
University of Greenwich Business School, Greenwich, UK
*
Corresponding author: d.decremer@jbs.cam.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Issues of morality and ethics have increasingly become more important in organizations and business settings. Traditionally, these issues of ethics and social responsibility in business settings have been discussed and commented on by prescriptive approaches that are grounded in philosophical traditions. Building on the idea that we need to develop a more comprehensive and complete understanding of the value that people assign to ethics and how it influences their actions and decisions, in the present article we discuss and review the importance and relevance of adopting also a descriptive approach that is grounded in the behavioral sciences (referred to as behavioral business ethics). This approach has the advantages to promote our insights into how people can show both good and bad behavior and why this is the case. Behavioral business ethics therefore represents an important research challenge for organizational researchers to pursue and engage more meaningfully with more prescriptive approaches.

Keywords

individual ethical behaviorleadershiporganizational justicepractice
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 23 , Issue 3 , May 2017 , pp. 437 - 455
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alzola, M. (2011). The reconciliation project: Separation and integration in business ethics research. Journal of Business Ethics, 99, 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arendt, H. (1963). Eichmann in Jerusalem: A report on the banality of evil. New York, NY: Viking Press.Google Scholar
Arnaud, A., & Schminke, M. (2012). The ethical climate and context of organizations: A comprehensive model. Organization Science, 23(6), 1767–1780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asch, S. E. (1955). Opinions and social pressure. Scientific American, 193, 31–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashforth, B., & Anand, V. (2003). The normalization of corruption in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 1–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banaji, M. R., & Bhaskar, R. (2000). Implicit stereotypes and memory: The bounded rationality of social beliefs. In D. L. Schacter, & E. Scarry (Eds.), Memory, brain, and belief (pp. 139–175). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Banaji, M. R., Bazerman, M., & Chugh, D. (2003). How (Un)ethical are you? Harvard Business Review, 81(12), 56–64.Google ScholarPubMed
Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpretation of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(3), 193–209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barnett, T., & Vaicys, C. (2000). The moderating effect of individuals’ perception of ethical work climate on ethical judgments and behavioral intentions. Journal of Business Ethics, 27(4), 351–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauman, Z. (1991). Modernity and the holocaust. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bazerman, M. H., & Banaji, M. R. (2004). The social psychology of ordinary ethical failures. Social Justice Research, 17(2), 111–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bazerman, M., Tenbrunsel, A., & Wade-Benzoni, K. (1998). Negotiating with yourself and losing: Making decisions with competing internal preferences. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 225–241.Google Scholar
Bennett, R. J., & Robinson, S. L. (2000). Development of a measure of workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 349–360.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bersoff, D. M. (1999). Why good people sometimes do bad things: Motivated reasoning and unethical behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(1), 28–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beu, D., & Buckley, M. R. (2004). Using accountability to create a more ethical climate. Human Resource Management Review, 14(1), 67–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boas, S., Pillai, R., Bligh, M., & Uhl-Bien, M. (2006). Follower-centered perspectives on leadership: A tribute to the memory of James R. Meindl. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Brewer, M. B., & Kramer, R. M. (1986). Choice behavior in social dilemmas: Effects of social identity, group size and decision framing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(3), 543–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brief, A. P. (2012). The good, the bad, and the ugly: What behavioral business ethics researchers ought to be studying. In D. De Cremer, & A. Tenbrunsel (Eds.), Behavioral business ethics: Shaping an emerging field, 17–46). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brown, A. J., Vandekerckhove, W., & Dreyfus, S. (2014). The relationship between transparency, whistleblowing, and public trust. In P. Ala’I, & R. G. Vaughn (Eds.), Research handbook on transparency (pp. 30–58). Cheltenham/Northamton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Brown, M., Treviño, L. K., & Harrison, D. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97(2), 117–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchan, H. F. (2005). Ethical decision making in the public accounting profession: An extension of Ajzen’s theory of planned behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 61(2), 165–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burggraeve, R. (1999). Violence and the vulnerable face of the other. Journal of Social Philosophy, 30(1), 29–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cain, D. M., Loewenstein, G., & Moore, D. A. (2005). The dirt on coming clean: Perverse effects of disclosing conflicts of interest. Journal of Legal Studies, 34(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. (1999). Dual process theories in social psychology. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Chugh, D., Bazerman, M. H., & Banaji, M. R. (2005). Bounded ethicality as a psychological barrier to recognizing conflicts of interest. In D. A. Moore, D. M. Cain, G. Loewenstein, & M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Conflicts of interest: problems and solutions from law, medicine and organizational settings (pp. 74–95). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darley, J. M. (1992). Social organization for the production of evil. Psychological Inquiry, 3(2), 199–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Cremer, D., & Tenbrunsel, A. E. (2012). Behavioral business ethics: Shaping an emerging field. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
De Cremer, D. (2003). How self-conception may lead to inequality: An experimental investigation of the impact of hierarchical roles on the equality-rule when allocating organizational resources. Group and Organization Management, 28(2), 282–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Cremer, D. (2009). Being unethical or becoming unethical: An introduction. In D. De Cremer (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on ethical behavior and decision making (pp. 3–13). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
De Cremer, D. (2010a). On the psychology of preventing and dealing with ethical failures: A behavioral ethics approach. In M. Schminke (Ed.), Managerial ethics (pp. 111–125). New York, NY: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
De Cremer, D. (2010b). Breaking the corruption habit. Business Strategy Review, 21(1), 67–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Cremer, D. (2010c). When financial compensations versus apologies matter after transgressions in bargaining: It depends on whether the transgression involved losses or gains. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31(6), 843–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Cremer, D. (2014). Why ethics is often grey and not white: Business ethics challenges in a global world. World Financial Review, January/February, 23–25.Google Scholar
De Cremer, D., & van Dijk, E. (2005). When and why leaders put themselves first: Leader behavior in resource allocations as a function of feeling entitled. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35(4), 553–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Cremer, D., & van Dijk, E. (2008). Leader-follower effects in resource dilemmas: The roles of leadership selection and social responsibility. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 11(3), 355–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Cremer, D., & van Knippenberg, D. (2003). Cooperation with leaders in social dilemmas: On the effects of procedural fairness and outcome favorability in structural cooperation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91(1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Cremer, D., Hoogervorst, N., & Desmet, P. (2012). Procedural justice and sanctions in social dilemmas: The moderating effects of group feedback and identification. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(7), 1675–1693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Cremer, D., Mayer, D. M., Van Dijke, M., Schouten, B. C., & Bardes, M. (2009). Self-sacrificial leadership promoting prosocial behavior: The moderating role of prevention focus. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(4), 887–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Cremer, D., Pillutla, M., & Reinders Folmer, C. (2011). How important is an apology to you? Forecasting errors in predicting the true value of apologies. Psychological Science, 22(1), 45–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Cremer, D., Snyder, M., & Dewitte, S. (2001). The less I trust, the less I contribute (or not)? The effects of trust, accountability and self-monitoring in social dilemmas. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31(1), 93–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Cremer, D., Tenbrunsel, A., & van Dijke, M. (2010). Regulating ethical failures: Insights from psychology. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(1), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Cremer, D., van Dick, R., Tenbrunsel, A. E., Pillutla, M., & Murnighan, J. K. (2011). On ethical behaviour and decision making in management: A behavioural ethics approach. British Journal of Management, 22(1), 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Cremer, D., van Dijk, E., & Pillutla, M. (2010). Explaining unfair offers in ultimatum games and their effects on trust: An experimental approach. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20(1), 107–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Cremer, D., van Dijke, M., & Mayer, D. (2010). Cooperating when ‘you’ and ‘I’ are treated fairly: The moderating role of leader prototypicality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(6), 1121–1133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desmet, P., De Cremer, D., & van Dijk, E. (2011). In money we trust? When financial compensations matter in repairing trust perceptions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 114(2), 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epley, N., & Dunning, D. (2000). Feeling ‘holier than thou’: Are self-serving assessments produced by errors in self- or social prediction? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 861–875.Google Scholar
Erondu, E., Sharland, A., & Okpara, J.O. (2004). Corporate ethics in Nigeria: A test of the concept of an ethical climate. Journal of Business Ethics, 51(4), 349–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eyal, T., Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (2008). Judging near and distant virtue and vice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(4), 1204–1209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foot, Ph. (1967). The problem of abortion and the doctrine of the double effect. Oxford Review, 5, 5–15.Google Scholar
Fritzsche, D. J. (2000). Ethical climates and the ethical dimension of decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 24(2), 125–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, D. T., Pinel, E. C., Wilson, T. D., Blumberg, S. J., & Wheatley, T. (1998). Immune neglect: A source of durability bias in affective forecasting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(3), 617–638.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gino, F., & Bazerman, M. H. (2009). When misconduct goes unnoticed: The acceptability of gradual erosion in others’ unethical behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 708–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gino, F., Schweitzer, M. E., & Mead, N. L. (2011). Unable to resist temptation: How self-control depletion promotes unethical behaviour. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115(2), 191–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, J. (2013). Moral tribes: Emotion, reason, and the gap between us and them. London, UK: Atlentic Books.Google Scholar
Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293(5537), 2105–2108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Habermas, J. (1991). Moral consciousness and comunicative action. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814–834.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haidt, J. (2007). The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, 316(5827), 998–1002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harbour, M., & Kisfalvi, V. (2014). In the eye of the beholder: An exploration of managerial courage. Journal of Business Ethics, 119, 493–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilbig, B. E., & Hessler, C. M. (2013). What lies beneath: How the distance between truth and lie drives dishonesty. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(2), 263–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, D. (1969). An enquiry concerning the principles of morals. La Salle, IL: Open Court. (Original work published 1777).Google Scholar
Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 366–395.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (2000). Choices, values, and frames. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1959). Foundation of the metaphysics of morals (Translated by L. W. Beck). Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill (Original work published 1785).Google Scholar
Kern, M., & Chugh, D. (2009). Bounded ethicality: The perils of loss framing. Psychological Science, 20(3), 378–384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khandwalla, P. N. (1977). The design of organizations. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Kish-Gephart, J. J., Harrison, D. A., & Treviño, L. K. (2010). Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: Meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kouchaki, M., Smith-Crowe, K., Brief, A. P., & Sousa, C. (2013). Seeing green: Mere exposure to money triggers a business decision frame and unethical outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 121(1), 53–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, P. Y., & Lorsch, J. (1967). Organization and environment: Managing differentiation and integration. Boston, MA: Division of Research, Harvard University School.Google Scholar
Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In K. Gergen, M. Greenberg, & R. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 27–55). New York, NY: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, D. (2002). Change blindness blindness: as visual metacognition. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 9(5-6), 111–130.Google Scholar
Levinas, E. (1969). Totality and infinity: An essay on exteriority (Translated by A. Lingis). Pittsburgh: Dusquesne University Press (Original work published in 1961).Google Scholar
Levinas, E. (2003). Humanism of the other. Chicago: University of Illinois Press. (Original work published in 1972).Google Scholar
Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Stephan, E. (2007). Psychological distance. In A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles, Vol. 2, pp. 353–383). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Lind, E. A., & Tyler, R. T. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York/London: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyotard, J. F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge (Translated by G. Bennington & B. Massumi). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minneapolis (Original work published in 1979).Google Scholar
Mayer, D. M., Aquino, K., Greenbaum, R. L., & Kuenzi, M. (2012). Who displays ethical leadership, and why does it matter? An examination of antecedents and consequences of ethical leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 151–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, D. M., Kuezni, M., Greenbaum, R. L., Bardes, M., & Salvador, R. (2009). How low does ethical leadership flow? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integration model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734.Google Scholar
Miceli, M. P., Near, J. P., & Dworkin, T. M. (2008). Whistle-blowing in organizations. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. New York, NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Moore, C. (2008). Moral disengagement in processes of organizational corruption. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(1), 129–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, C. (2009). Psychological processes in organizational corruption. In D. De Cremer (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on ethical behavior and decision making (pp. 35–71). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Moore, C., & Gino, F. (2013). Ethically adrift: How others pull our moral compass from true North, and how we can fix it. Research in Organizational Behavior, 33, 53–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, D. A., & Loewenstein, G. (2004). Self-interest, automaticity, and the psychology of conflict of interest. Social Justice Research, 17(2), 189–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otsuka, M. (2008). Double effect, triple effect and the trolley problem: Squaring the circle in looping cases. Utilitas, 20(1), 92–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pillutla, M. M., Murnighan, J. K., & De Cremer, D. (2009). Transgressions as opportunities to build trust. Unpublished manuscript, London Business School, UK.Google Scholar
Poppe, M., & Valkenberg, H. (2003). Effects of gain versus loss and certain versus probable outcomes on social value orientations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33(3), 331–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Reinders Folmer, C., & De Cremer, D. (2012). Bad For Me Or Bad For Us? Interpersonal Orientations and the impact of losses on unethical behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(6), 760–771.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York, NY: Praeger.Google Scholar
Reynolds, S. J. (2008). Moral attentiveness: Who pays attention to the moral aspects of life? Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(5), 1027–1041.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reynolds, S. J., & Ceranic, T. L. (2007). The effects of moral judgment and moral identity on moral behavior: An empirical examination of the moral individual. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1610–1624.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reynolds, S. J., Leavitt, K., & DeCelles, K. A. (2010). Automatic ethics: The effects of implicit assumptions and contextual cues on moral behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(4), 752–760.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 10, pp. 173–220). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ruedy, N. E., Moore, C., & Gino, F. (2013). The cheater’s high: The unexpected affective benefits of unethical behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(4), 531–548.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schaubroeck, J. M., Hannah, S. T., Avolio, B. J., Kozlowski, S. W. J., Lord, R. G., Treviño, L. K., Dimotakis, N., & Peng, A. C. (2012). Embedding ethical leadership within and across organization levels. Academy of Management Journal, 55(5), 1053–1078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2007). Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1096–1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schminke, M. (2010). Managerial ethics: Managing the psychology of morality. New York, NY: Routledge/Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Shalvi, S., Dana, J., & Handgraaf, M. J. J. (2011). Justified ethicality: Observing desired counterfactuals modifies ethical perceptions and behaviors. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115(2), 181–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slevin, D. P., & Covin, J. G. (1997). Strategy formation patterns, performance, and the significance of context. Journal of Management, 23, 189–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, M., & Cantor, N. (1998). Understanding personality and social behavior: A functionalist strategy. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 635–679). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Sondak, H., Neale, M. A., & Pinkley, R. L. (1995). The negotiated allocation of benefits and burdens: The impact of outcome valence, contribution, and relationship. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 64(3), 249–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stouten, J., De Cremer, D., & van Dijk, E. (2005). I am doing the best I can (for myself): Leadership roles as a function of variability on group harvest in resource dilemmas. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 9(3), 205–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stouten, J., Van Dijke, M., Mayer, D., De Cremer, D., & Eeuwema, M. (2013). Can a leader be seen as too ethical? The curvilinear effects of ethical leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(5), 680–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strack, F., & Mussweiler, T. (1997). Explaining the enigmatic anchoring effect: Mechanisms of selective accessibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(3), 437–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, S. E. (1989). Positive illusions: Creative self-deception and the healthy mind. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Tenbrunsel, A. E. (2005). Commentary: Bounded ethicality and conflicts of interest. In D. A. Moore, D. M. Cain, G. Loewenstein, & M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Conflicts of interest: Challenges and solutions in business, law, medicine and public policy (pp. 96–103). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Smith-Crowe, K. (2008). Ethical decision-making: Where we’ve been and where we’re going. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 545–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tenbrunsel, A. E., Smith-Crowe, K., & Umphress, E. E. (2003). Building houses on rocks: The role of the ethical infrastructure in organizations. Social Justice Research, 16(3), 285–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Thomson, J. J. (1985). The trolley problem. The Yale Law Journal, 94, 1395–1415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treviño, L. K. (1986). Ethical decision making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 601–617.Google Scholar
Treviño, L. K., Weaver, G. R., & Reynolds, S.J. (2006). Behavioral ethics in organizations: A review. Journal of Management, 32(6), 951–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal construal. Psychological Review, 110(3), 403–421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsahuridu, E., & Vandekerckhove, W. (2008). Organisational whistleblowing policies: making employees responsible or liable? Journal of Business Ethics, 82(1), 107–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turillo, C. J., Folger, R., Lavelle, J. J., Umphress, E. E., & Gee, J. O. (2002). Is virtue its own reward? Self-sacrificial decisions for the sake of fairness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89(1), 839–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(1974), 1124–1131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 452–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, T. R., & De Cremer, D. (2009). Ethics and rule adherence in groups. In D. De Cremer (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on ethical behavior and decision making (pp. 215–232). Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Tyler, T. R., Dienhart, J., & Thomas, T. (2008). The ethical commitment to compliance: Building value-based cultures. California Management Review, 50(2), 31–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, T. R. (1997). The psychology of legitimacy. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 323–344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Umphress, E. E., & Bingham, J. B. (2011). When employees do bad things for good reasons: Examining unethical pro-organizational behaviors. Organization Science, 22(3), 621–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unerman, J., & Bennett, M. (2004). Increased stakeholder dialogue and the internet: Towards greater corporate accountability or reinforcing capitalist hegemony? Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29(7), 685–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, E., & De Cremer, D. (2006). Putting one’s own interest first or not: Leader-follower effects and social value orientations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(10), 1352–1361.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vandekerckhove, W., & Commers, M. R. S. (2004). Whistle blowing and rational loyalty. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1-2), 225–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandekerckhove, W., & Tsahuridu, E. (2010). Risky rescues and the duty to blow the whistle. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(3), 362–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandekerckhove, W., Brown, A. J., & Tsahuridu, E. (2014). Managerial responsiveness to whistleblowing: Expanding the research horizon. In A. J. Brown, D. Lewis, R. Moberly, & W. Vandekerckhove (Eds.), International handbook on whistleblowing research (pp. 298–330). Cheltenham/Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Victor, B., & Cullen, J. B. (1987). A theory and measure of ethical climate in organizations. Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, 9, 51–71.Google Scholar
Walumbwa, F. O., & Schaubroeck, J. (2009). Leader personality traits and employee voice behavior: Mediating roles of ethical leadership and work group psychological safety. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1275–1286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, L., Zhong, C.-B., & Murnighan, J. K. (2014). The social and ethical consequences of a calculative mindset. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 125, 39–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, D. E., & Smith-Crowe, K. (2008). Deciding what’s right: The role of external sanctions and embarrassment in shaping moral judgments in the workplace. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 81–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, T. D., & Gilbert, D. T. (2003). Affective forecasting. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 345–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, T. D., & Gilbert, D. T. (2005). Affective forecasting knowing what to want. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(3), 131–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, T. D., Wheatley, T. P., Meyers, J. M., Gilbert, D. T., & Axsom, D. (2000). Focalism: A source of durability bias in affective forecasting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(5), 821–836.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zimbardo, P. G. (2007). The Lucifer effect: Understanding how good people turn evil. New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar