Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T13:16:14.464Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Neil Smith, Acquiring phonology: A cross-generational case-study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. Pp. xvii+265.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 January 2012

JOSEPH PAUL STEMBERGER*
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia
*
Author's address:Department of Linguistics, Totem Field Studios, 2613 West Mall, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6S 1A6, CanadaJoseph.Stemberger@ubc.ca

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bernhardt, Barbara H. & Stemberger, Joseph Paul. 1998. Handbook of phonological development: From the perspective of constraint-based nonlinear phonology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Dodd, Barbara & McEvoy, Sandra. 1994. Twin language or phonological disorder. Journal of Child Language 21.2, 273289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Felsenfeld, Susan, McGue, Matt & Broen, Patricia A.. 1995. Familial aggregation of phonological disorders: Results from a 28-year follow-up. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 38.5, 10911107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gnanadesikan, Amalia E. 2004. Markedness and faithfulness constraints in child phonology. In Kager, René, Pater, Joe & Zonneveld, Wim (eds.), Constraints in phonological acquisition, 73108. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Read, Charles. 1975. Children's categorization of speech sounds in English. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar
Smith, Neil V. 1973. The acquisition of phonology: A case study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar