Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T19:11:57.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Conceiving of Products and the Products of Conception: Reflections on Commodification, Consumption, ART, and Abortion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Jody Lyneé Madeira
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Thorny and difficult questions permeate the issue of commodification of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) and abortion. Are ART and abortion services or medical treatment? Are those who seek them patients or consumers? How should we understand the complex relationship between money, markets, choice, and the care relationship?

This paper rejects the dichotomy between patient and consumer roles and focuses instead on how attributes of each are meaningful to those seeking health care. Arguing that health care is already commodified, it suggests that both medicine and the market offer strategies for handling commodification. The important questions are how we understand these attributes and their role in care relationships, and which attributes we should encourage. The medical profession and patient role have long accommodated commodification, using fiduciary roles, flat fees and opaque pricing to distance payment and pricing from care provision.

Type
Symposium
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 43 , Issue 2 , Summer 2015 , pp. 293 - 306
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hall, M. A., “The Legal and Historical Foundations of Patients as Medical Consumers,” Georgetown Law Journal 96, no. 2 (2008): 583–597, at 585 n.8.Google Scholar
Pickering, W. G., “A Nation of People Called Patients,” Journal of Medical Ethics 17, no. 2 (1991): 91–92, at 91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neuberger, J. Tallis, R., “Do We Need a New Word for Patients?” British Medical Journal 318, no. 7222 (1999): 1756–1758, at 1756, 1757. See also Hall, supra note 1, at 585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, M. A. Schneider, C. E., “Patients as Consumers: Courts, Contracts and the New Medical Marketplace,” Michigan Law Review 106, no. 4 (2008): 643–689, at 688.Google Scholar
Id., at 652, 688. See also Tomes, N., “Patients or Health Care Consumers? Why the History of Contested Terms Matters,” in Stevens, R. A. Rosenberg, C. E. Burns, J. R., eds., History and Health Policy in the United States: Putting the Past Back In (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2006): At 106.Google Scholar
See Tomes, , supra note 5, at 85, 87.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
See Pickering, , supra note 2.Google Scholar
See Neuberger, Tallis, , supra note 3, at 1756–1757.Google Scholar
See Hall, , supra note 1, at 584; Hall and Schneider, supra note 4, at 647. Until recent years, however, health insurance has most often covered “in-network” services and not given care seekers incentives to research health care costs or seek out the least expensive providers.Google Scholar
Herzberg, S. R., “Client or Patient: Which Term Is More Appropriate for Use in Occupational Therapy?” American Journal of Occupational Therapy 44, no. 6 (1990): 561–564, at 562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loudon, J. et al., “Patients, Clients, Users or Customers: What Should We Call People Attending Sexual Health Services?” Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care 38, no. 1 (2012): 19–22, at 19, 21; see Hall, supra note 1, at 584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Herzberg, , supra note 11, at 561; Annas, G., Some Choice: Law, Medicine, and the Market (New York: Oxford University Press, 1998): At 46.Google Scholar
See Tomes, , supra note 5, at 83.Google Scholar
Arrow, K. J., “Uncertainty and the Welfare Economics of Medical Care,” American Economic Review 53, no. 5 (1963): 941–73, at 965.Google Scholar
See Tomes, , supra note 5, at 85.Google Scholar
See Hall, , supra note 1, at 585.Google Scholar
Raphael, B. Emerson, B., “Are Patients Clients or People?” Medical Journal of Australia 154, no. 3 (1991): 183–184, at 184.Google Scholar
Ramdass, M. J. et al., “Question of ‘Patients’ Versus ‘Clients,” Journal of Qualitative Clinical Practice 21, no. 1–2 (2001): 14–15; Wing, P. C., “Patient or Client? If in Doubt, Ask,” Canadian Medical Association Journal 157, no. 3 (1997): 287–280; Simmons, P., “Service User, Patient, Client, User or Survivor: Describing Recipients of Mental Health Services,” Psychiatrist Online 34, no. 1 (2010): 20–23; Nair, B. R., “Patient, Client, or Customer?” Medical Journal of Australia 169, no. 11–12 (1998): 593; McGuire-Snieckus, R. McCabe, R. Priebe, S., “Patient, Client or Service User? A Survey of Patient Preferences of Dress and Address of Six Mental Health Professions,” Psychiatric Bulletin 27, no. 8 (2003): 305–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, D., “Commodification,” in Southerton, D., ed., Encyclopedia of Consumer Culture, vol. 1 (Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2011): 212–214, at 212; Ertman, M. Williams, J., “Preface: Freedom, Equality, and the Many Futures of Commodification,” in Ertman, M. Williams, J., eds., Rethinking Commodification (New York City: New York University Press, 2005): 1–7, at 1.Google Scholar
See Evans, , supra note 20.Google Scholar
Id., at 213.Google Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary, “Consumption,” available at <http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/39997?redirectedFrom=consumption#eid> (last visited April 10, 2015).+(last+visited+April+10,+2015).>Google Scholar
See Ertman, , supra note 20, at 2.Google Scholar
Radin, M. J., “Market Inalienability,” Harvard Law Review 100, no. 8 (1987): 1849–1937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
505 U.S. 833 (1992).Google Scholar
See Siegel, R. B., “The Right's Reasons: Constitutional Conflict and the Spread of Women-Protective Anti-Abortion Argument,” Duke Law Journal 57, no. 6 (2008): 1641–1692.Google Scholar
Missouri Right to Life, “Missouri House Passes Legislation That Extends Reflection Period to 72 Hours and Requires Parental Notification,” May 13, 2014, available at <http://missourilife.org/news/2014/2014-03-12.html> (last visited April 10, 2015).+(last+visited+April+10,+2015).>Google Scholar
Hord, C. E., “Making Safe Making Safe Abortion Accessible: A Practical Guide for Advocates (IPAS),” available at <http://www.ipas.org/∼/media/Files/Ipas%20Publications/AdvocacyGuide.ashx> (last visited April 10, 2015).+(last+visited+April+10,+2015).>Google Scholar
Schneiderman, D., “Constitutionalizing the Culture-Ideology of Consumerism,” Social and Legal Studies 7, no. 2 (1998): 213–238, at 219.Google Scholar
Id., at 218–219.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. S., The Public Life of the Fetal Sonogram: Technology, Consumption, and the Politics of Reproduction (Rutgers: Rutgers University Press, 2008): At 118–119.Google Scholar
Radin, M. J. Sunder, M., “Introduction: The Subject and Object of Commodification, in Rethinking Commodification,” in Rethinking Commodification, supra note 20.Google Scholar
Fletcher, R., “Legal Form, Commodities and Reproduction: Reading Pashukanis,” in Drakopoulou, M., ed., Feminist Encounters with Legal Philosophy (New York: Routledge, 2013): At 138–157.Google Scholar
Krawiec, K., “The Dark Side of Commodification Critiques: Politics and Elitism in Standardized Testing,” Washington University Journal of Law and Policy 35 (2011): 349–362, at 350–354; Cohen, I. G., “The Price of Everything, the Value of Nothing: Reframing the Commodification Debate,” Harvard Law Review 117, no. 2 (2003): 689–710, at 690–691.Google Scholar
Zelizer, V. A., The Purchase of Intimacy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007): At 22.Google Scholar
See Radin, , supra note 25.Google Scholar
Pellegrino, E. D., “The Commodification of Medical and Health Care: The Moral Consequences of a Paradigm Shift from a Professional to a Market Ethic,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24, no. 3 (1999): 243–66, at 252.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Petchesky, R., “The Body as Property: A Feminist Re-vision,” in Ginsburg, F.D. Rapp, R., eds., Conceiving the New World Order: The Global Politics of Reproduction (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995): At 387–406. See also Duxbury, N., “Do Markets Degrade?” Modern Law Review 59, no. 3 (1996): 331–348, at 343.Google Scholar
See Krawiec, , supra note 35, at 349–350.Google Scholar
See Radin, Sunder, , supra note 33, at 13; Zelizer, supra note 36; Satz, D., Why Some Things Should Not Be for Sale: The Moral Limits of Markets (New York: Oxford University Press, 2012): At 11; Sandel, M. J., What Money Can’t Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2012): At 15.Google Scholar
Ertman, M. M., “What's Wrong With a Parenthood Market? A New and Improved Theory of Commodification,” in Rethinking Commodification, supra note 20.Google Scholar
Fletcher, R., “Reproductive Consumption,” Feminist Theory 7, no. 1 (2006): 27–47, at 28, 30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Taylor, , supra note 32, at 140.Google Scholar
I am indebted to I. Glenn Cohen for this observation.Google Scholar
Krawiec, K., “Altruism and Intermediation in the Market for Babies,” Washington and Lee Law Review 66, no. 1 (2009): 203–257, at 241.Google Scholar
Id., at 75.Google Scholar
Sassatelli, R., Consumer Culture: History, Theory and Politics (Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc., 2007): At 115, 142.Google Scholar
Becker, G., “Selling Hope: Commercialization and Consumption of the New Reproductive Technologies in the United States,” Sciences Sociales et Sante 18, no. 4 (2000): 105–126, at 109, 120.Google Scholar
Schneider, C. E. Hall, M. A., “The Patient Life: Can Consumers Direct Health Care?” American Journal of Law and Medicine 35, no. 1 (2009): 7–65, at 14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Becker, , supra note 50, at 116–117.Google Scholar
Madeira, J., “Woman Scorned: Resurrecting Infertile Women's Decision-Making Autonomy,” Maryland Law Review 71, no. 2 (2012): 339–410, at 366.Google Scholar
Harris, L. et al., “Dynamics of Stigma in Abortion Work: Findings from a Pilot Study of the Providers Share Workshop,” Social Science & Medicine 73, no. 7 (2011): 1062–1070, at 1062–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Krawiec, , supra note 47, at 213.Google Scholar
Hawkins, J., “Selling ART: An Empirical Assessment of Advertising on Fertility Clinics' Websites,” Indiana Law Journal 88, no. 4 (2013): 1147–1179, at 1149.Google Scholar
Hawkins, J., “Doctors as Bankers: Evidence From Fertility Markets,” Tulane Law Review 84, no. 4 (2010): 841–898, at 843, 849.Google Scholar
Id., at 850.Google Scholar
Id., at 844.Google Scholar
Id., at 873.Google Scholar
See Hawkins, , supra note 56, at 1155.Google Scholar
Levitan, I., “IVF Worldwide Blog: The 2nd IVF Worldwide Live Congress: A Marketing Wrap-Up,” available at <http://www.ivf-worldwide.com/ivf-worldwide-blog/the-2nd-ivf-world-wide-live-congress-a-marketing-wrap-up.html> (last visited April 10, 2015).+(last+visited+April+10,+2015).>Google Scholar
See Hawkins, , supra note 56, at 1156.Google Scholar
Ryan, M., Ethics and Economics of Assisted Reproduction: The Cost of Longing (Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 2001): At 23–24, 26–27.Google Scholar
Id., at 28; Krawiec, supra note 47, at 213.Google Scholar
See Becker, , supra note 50, at 106, 107–109, 120.Google Scholar
Id., at 110, 112.Google Scholar
Id., at 114, 119.Google Scholar
Id., at 116.Google Scholar
Id., at 117, 119.Google Scholar
Id., at 117, 121.Google Scholar
Id., at 121.Google Scholar
Bigelow v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 421 U.S. 809, 828 (1975).Google Scholar
Todd, S., “Secrecy and Safety: Health Care Workers in Abortion Clinics,” Labour/Le Travail 50, (2002): 401–406, at 405.Google Scholar
Sethna, C. Doull, M., “Accidental Tourists: Canadian Women, Abortion Tourism, and Travel,” Women's Studies 41, no. 4 (2012): 457–75, at 461.Google Scholar
See Todd, , supra note 74, at 403, 405.Google Scholar
Joffe, C., “Abortion Work: Strains, Coming Strategies, Policy Implications,” Social Work 24, no. 6 (1979): 485–489, at 486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breitton, K., “Surrogate Motherhood, Disability, and Abortion in the Case of ‘Baby S,”’ Penn Bioethics Journal VIII, no. ii (2012): 8–9, at 8.Google Scholar
Houle, K. L. F., Responsibility, Complexity, and Abortion: Toward a New Image of Ethical Thought (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2014): At 86.Google Scholar
See Roberts, S. et al., “Out-of-Pocket Costs and Insurance Coverage for Abortion in the United States,” Women's Health Issues 24, no. 2 (March-April 2014): e211–e218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See, e.g., Chelstowska, A., “Stigmatisation and Commercialisation of Abortion Services in Poland: Turning Sin into Gold,” Reproductive Health Matters 19, no. 37 (2011): 98–106; Wolfe, A., Whose Keeper? Social Science and Moral Obligation (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989): At 240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gitlow, H. S., “Abortion Services: Time for a Discussion of Marketing Policies,” Journal of Marketing 42, no. 2 (1978): 71–82, at 72; Garbarino, K. et al., The Abortion Business: A Report on Free-Standing Abortion Clinics (Cambridge, MA: Women's Research Action Project, 1975).Google Scholar
See Todd, , supra note 74, at 405.Google Scholar
Hoffman, M., Intimate Wars: The Life and Times of the Woman Who Brought Abortion from the Back Alley to the Boardroom (New York: Feminist Press at CUNY, 2012): At 82.Google Scholar
Id., at 183.Google Scholar
Id., at 184.Google Scholar
Simonds, W., Abortion at Work: Ideology and Practice in a Feminist Clinic (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1996): At 108.Google Scholar
Fletcher, R., “Reproductive Consumption: Adapting British Abortion Services to Irish Women's Needs,” Presentation at the Annual Meeting of the Law and Society Association (May 27, 2004), available at <http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p_mla_apa_research_citation/1/1/7/0/6/p117062_index.html?phpsessid=6nfu69vna6a7t4du8q7s866nc2> (last visited April 10, 2015); Whittaker, A. Speier, A., “‘Cycling Overseas’: Care, Commodification, and Stratification in Cross-Border Reproductive Travel,” Medical Anthropology 29, no. 4 (2010): 363–383.Google Scholar
See Sassatelli, , supra note 49, at 154.Google Scholar
Id., at 154, 156.Google Scholar
Id., at 156.Google Scholar
See Madeira, , supra note 53.Google Scholar
See Sassatelli, , supra note 49, at 156–157.Google Scholar
Id., at 160.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id., at 197.Google Scholar
Galvin, R. S., “Consumerism and Controversy: A Conversation with Regina Herzlinger,” Health Affairs 26, no. 5 (2007): 552–59, at 553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Madison, K. Jacobson, P. D., “Consumer-Directed Health Care,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review PEN-Numbra 156, (2007): 107–25, at 108, available at <http://www.pennlawreview.com/online/156-U-Pa-L-Rev-PENNum-bra-107.pdf> (last visited April 18, 2015).Google Scholar
Korobkin, R., “Comparative Effectiveness Research As Choice Architecture: The Behavioral Law and Economics Solutions to the Health Care Cost Crisis,” Michigan Law Review 112, no. 4 (2014): 523–574, at 525.Google Scholar
See Galvin, , supra note 97, at 559.Google Scholar
Id., at 553.Google Scholar
Id., at 554.Google Scholar
Id., at 554–555.Google Scholar
Id., at 556–557.Google Scholar
Id., at 557.Google Scholar
Id., at 557.Google Scholar
Gawande, A., “Big Med,” The New Yorker, August 13, 2012, available at <http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2012/08/13/120813fa_fact_gawande?currentPage=all> (last visited April 10, 2015).+(last+visited+April+10,+2015).>Google Scholar
The Kaiser Family Foundation and Agency for Health Care Research and Quality, National Survey on Americans as Health Care Consumers: An Update on the Role of Quality Information (2000): At Chart 4: Doctor Quality, available at <http://archive.ahrq.gov/professionals/quality-patient-safety/quality-resources/tools/kffupdate/kffchartbk00.pdf> (last visited April 18, 2015)+(last+visited+April+18,+2015)>Google Scholar
Id., at Chart 7: Other Indicators of Health Plan Quality.Google Scholar
See Madison, Jacobson, , supra note 98, at 111.Google Scholar
Id., at 112.Google Scholar
573 U.S.____ (2014) (Hobby Lobby case).Google Scholar
See, e.g., Philpott, D., “Why Christians Cannot Just ‘Lighten Up’ over the HHS Mandate,” Religious Freedom Project, Berkley Center for Religion, Peace & World Affairs, available at <http://berkleycenter.georgetown.edu/essays/why-christians-cannot-just-lighten-up-over-the-hhs-mandate> (last visited April 18, 2015).+(last+visited+April+18,+2015).>Google Scholar
Bitler, M. Schmidt, L., “Health Disparities and Infertility: Impacts of State Level Insurance Mandates,” Fertility and Sterility 85, no. 4 (2006): 858–865; Stephen, E. H. Chandra, A., “Use of Infertility Services in the United States: 1995,” Family Planning Perspectives 32, no. 3 (2000): 132–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Domar, A. et al., “A Prospective Investigation into the Reasons Why Insured United States Patients Drop Out of In Vitro Fertilization Treatment,” Fertility & Sterility 94, no. 4 (September 2010): 1457–1459.Google Scholar
See Guttmacher Institute, “Characteristics of Women Having Abortions,” available at <http://www.guttmacher.org/in-the-know/characteristics.html> (last visited April 10, 2015) (reporting that women with family incomes below the federal poverty level account for more than 40% of abortions, whereas those with incomes 200% above the poverty line have abortions at half the national rate).+(last+visited+April+10,+2015)+(reporting+that+women+with+family+incomes+below+the+federal+poverty+level+account+for+more+than+40%+of+abortions,+whereas+those+with+incomes+200%+above+the+poverty+line+have+abortions+at+half+the+national+rate).>Google Scholar
See Guttmacher Institute, “State Policies in Brief: An Overview of Abortion Laws,” available at <http://www.guttmacher.org/statecenter/spibs/spib_OAL.pdf> (last visited April 10, 2015).+(last+visited+April+10,+2015).>Google Scholar
See Guttmacher Institute, “State Policies in Brief: Counseling and Waiting Periods for Abortion,” available at <http://www.guttmacher.org/statecenter/spibs/spib_MWPA.pdf> (last visited April 10, 2015).+(last+visited+April+10,+2015).>Google Scholar
See Schneider, Hall, , supra note 51.Google Scholar
See Madison, Jacobson, , supra note 98, at 115.Google Scholar
Cohen, I. G., “Protecting Patients with Passports: Medical Tourism and the Patient-Protective Argument,” Iowa Law Review 95, no. 5 (2010): 1467–1567, at 1507–1508.Google Scholar
See Schneider, Hall, , supra note 51; Korobkin, supra note 99, at 531–538.Google Scholar
See Kaiser Family Foundation, supra note 108.Google Scholar
See Madison, K., “Regulating Health Care Quality in an Information Age,” U.C. Davis Law Review 40, no. 5 (2007): 1577–1654.Google Scholar
See Gawande, , supra note 107.Google Scholar
See Galvin, , supra note 97, at 557–558.Google Scholar
See Korobkin, , supra note 99, at 527.Google Scholar
Swanson, K., “The Doctor's Dilemma: Paternalism in the Medicolegal History of Assisted Reproduction and Abortion,” Intersections in Reproduction: Perspectives on Abortion, Assisted Reproductive Technologies, and Judicial Review, Program for the Study of Reproductive Justice, Yale Law School, April 2014.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
See Madison, Jacobson, , supra note 98, at 124.Google Scholar