National Institutes of Health, “Genomic Data Sharing Policy” (2014), available at <https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-14-124.html> (last visited January 10, 2019); D. B. Taichman, J. Backus, C. Baethge, and H. Bauchner et al., “Sharing Clinical Trial Data: A Proposal From the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors,” Annals of Internal Medicine 164, no. 7 (2016): 505–506, available at <http://annals.org/article.aspx?doi=10.7326/M15-2928> (last visited January 10, 2019).+(last+visited+January+10,+2019);+D.+B.+Taichman,+J.+Backus,+C.+Baethge,+and+H.+Bauchner+et+al.,+“Sharing+Clinical+Trial+Data:+A+Proposal+From+the+International+Committee+of+Medical+Journal+Editors,”+Annals+of+Internal+Medicine+164,+no.+7+(2016):+505–506,+available+at++(last+visited+January+10,+2019).>Google Scholar

Sage Bionetworks is an example of an open science advocate.Google Scholar

Villanueva, A.G., Cook-Deegan, R., Koenig, B.A., and Deverka, P.A. et al., “Characterizing the Biomedical Data-Sharing Landscape,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 47, no. 1 (2019): 21-30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deverka, P.A., Majumder, M.A., Villanueva, A.G., and Anderson, M. et al., “Creating a Data Resource: What Will It Take to Build a Medical Information Commons?” Genome Medicine 9, no. 84 (2017): 1-5, available at <https://genomemedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13073-017-0476-3> (last visited January 10, 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Majumder, M.A., Zuk, P.D., and McGuire, A.L., “Medical Information Commons,” draft, in Routledge Handbook of the Study of the Commons (Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, Forthcoming 2018), available at <https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3131913> (last visited January 10, 2019).+(last+visited+January+10,+2019).>Google Scholar

See GA4GH Framework for Responsible Sharing of Genomic and Health-Related Data (2014), available at <https://thehugojournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s11568-014-0003-1> (last visited January 10, 2019) and Privacy and Security Policy (2015), available at <https://www.ga4gh.org/wp-content/uploads/Privacy-and-Security-Policy.pdf> (last visited January 10, 2019). See also OECD Guidelines on Human Biobanks and Genetic Research Databases (2009), available at <http://www.oecd.org/sti/emerging-tech/44054609.pdf> (last visited January 10, 2019).+(last+visited+January+10,+2019)+and+Privacy+and+Security+Policy+(2015),+available+at++(last+visited+January+10,+2019).+See+also+OECD+Guidelines+on+Human+Biobanks+and+Genetic+Research+Databases+(2009),+available+at++(last+visited+January+10,+2019).>Google Scholar

See Deverka, supra note 4.Google Scholar

Knoppers, B.M., “Framework for Responsible Sharing of Genomic and Health-Related Data,” The HUGO Journal 8, no. 1 (2014): 3, available at <https://doi.org/10.1186/s11568-014-0003-1> (last visited January 10, 2019); National Institutes of Health, “Precision Medicine Initiative: Privacy and Trust Principles,” All of Us Research Program, available at <https://allofus.nih.gov/about/program-overview/precision-medicine-initiative-privacy-and-trust-principles#precision-medicine-initiative-privacy-and-trust-principles-2> (last visited January 10, 2019); See also A. Adjekum, M. Ienca, and E. Vayena “What Is Trust? Ethics and Risk Governance in Precision Medicine and Predictive Analytics,” Omics: A Journal of Integrative Biology 21, no. 12 (2017): 704–710, available at <https://doi.org/10.1089/omi.2017.0156> (last visited January 10, 2019); Deverka, supra note 4; A.L. McGuire, M.A. Majumder, A.G. Villanueva, and J. Bardill et al., “Importance of Participant-Centricity and Trust for a Sustainable Medical Information Commons,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 47, no. 1 (2019): 12-20; R. Cook-Deegan and A.L. McGuire, “Moving beyond Bermuda: Sharing Data to Build a Medical Information Commons,” Genome Research 27, no. 6 (2017): 897–901, available at <https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.216911.116> (last visited January 10, 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

See Villanueva, supra note 3.Google Scholar

See id.Google Scholar

For description of these categories see Villanueva, supra note 3. Definitions reproduced here: open-access data-sharing initiatives offer data access with no required action, such as creating an account or submitting an application. Controlled-access data-sharing initiatives require an action, such as application submission and approval and/or data use agreement, to grant data access.Google Scholar

Harris, P.A., Taylor, R., Thielke, R., and Payne, J. et al., “Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) — A Metadata-Driven Methodology and Workflow Process for Providing Translational Research Informatics Support,” Journal of Biomedical Informatics 42, no. 2 (2016): 377-381, available at <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010> (last visited January 10, 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

The Global Alliance for Genomics and Health, Data Sharing Lexicon (March 2016), GA4GH Website, available at <https://www.ga4gh.org/docs/ga4ghtoolkit/regulatoryandethics/GA4GH_Data_Sharing_Lexicon_Mar15.pdf> (last visited January 10, 2019), at 6.+(last+visited+January+10,+2019),+at+6.>Google Scholar

The 34 initiatives reviewed, in alphabetical order, were: Altruist Database; Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative; AmbryShare; Cancer Genome Characterization Initiative; CF Foundation Patient Registry; Colon Cancer Family Registry; Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults; Critical Path Institute CPAD; Database of Chromosomal Imbalance and Phenotype in Humans Using Ensembl Resources; Duchenne Registry; Framingham Heart Study; Genes for Good; Global FKRP Registry; HEROIC Registry; Jackson Heart Study; Kaiser Permanente Research Bank; Metastatic Breast Cancer Project; MSSNG; Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation Researcher Gateway; MyVHL: Patient Natural History Study; Open Humans; openSNP; PAH Biobank; Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative; Personalized Medicine Research Project Database; Project GENIE; Psychiatric Genomics Consortium; Rare Epilepsy Network; Simons Foundation Autism Research Initiative (SFARI Base); Texas Alzheimer's Research and Care Consortium; Texas Cancer Research Biobank; The Genographic Project DNA Analysis Repository; The Harvard Personal Genome Project; Wisconsin Registry for Alzheimer's Prevention.Google Scholar

Zip code is often used as a geographic scale in studies of health and the built environment. Because zip codes can be used to connect data from different databases to examine environmental attributes, zip codes were captured as part of the built environment variable.Google Scholar

Of note, some of the initiatives reviewed enrolled participants and collected data in a clinical setting or at an academic institution and shared data electronically online. A few of the initiatives reviewed enrolled participants through the website, and those that provided consent or terms of use information for collecting and sharing research data on minors indicated that the website was intended for adults or that only the parent or legal guardian may enroll a child under 13. Therefore, Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) would not be triggered.Google Scholar

AliveAndKickn, HEROIC Registry Website, available at <https://aliveandkickn.org/heroic-registry-0> (last visited January 10, 2019).+(last+visited+January+10,+2019).>Google Scholar

See openSNP, Sign Up Website, available at <https://open-snp.org/signup> (last visited January 10, 2019).+(last+visited+January+10,+2019).>Google Scholar

National Institutes of Health, Certificates of Confidentiality: Background Information, Research Involving Human Subjects Website, available at <https://humansubjects.nih.gov/coc/background> (last visited January 10, 2019).+(last+visited+January+10,+2019).>Google Scholar

Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, Frequently Asked Questions, Personalized Medicine Research Project Website, available at <http://www.marshfieldresearch.org/chg/pmrp/faqs> (last visited January 10, 2019).+(last+visited+January+10,+2019).>Google Scholar

Framingham Heart Study, Genetic Data, Framingham Heart Study Website, available at <https://www.framinghamheart-study.org/fhs-for-researchers/genetic-data/> (last visited January 10, 2019).+(last+visited+January+10,+2019).>Google Scholar

See the terms of access and information on data access on the AACR Project GENIE: Data Website (September 21, 2018), available at <https://www.aacr.org/RESEARCH/RESEARCH/PAGES/AACR-PROJECT-GENIE-DATA.ASPX> (last visited January 10, 2019).+(last+visited+January+10,+2019).>Google Scholar

Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, Data Sharing and Publication Policy (January 2016) at 1, available at <http://adni.loni.usc.edu/wp-content/uploads/how_to_apply/ADNI_DSP_Policy.pdf> (last visited January 10, 2019).+(last+visited+January+10,+2019).>Google Scholar

See “Data Sharing” section in Simons Collection Researcher Distribution Agreement (May 2017), available at <http://simonsfoundation.s3.amazonaws.com/share/Policies_and_forms/2017/FormUpdates_2017_06_08/SFARI-RDA.pdf> (last visited January 10, 2019).+(last+visited+January+10,+2019).>Google Scholar

Categories of members involved in data-sharing decisions are not mutually exclusive.Google Scholar

Jackson Heart Study Community Outreach Center Website, available at <http://www.jsums.edu/jsucorc/> (last visited January 10, 2019).+(last+visited+January+10,+2019).>Google Scholar

For discussion on environmental impact on health, see Carlsten, C., Brauer, M., Brinkman, F., and Brook, J. et al., “Genes, The Environment and Personalized Medicine,” EMBO Reports 15, no. 7 (2014): 736–739, available at <https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4196974/> (last visited January 10, 2019); C. Jiang, X. Wang, X. Li, and J. Inlora et al., “Dynamic Human Environmental Exposome Revealed by Longitudinal Personal Monitoring,” Cell 175, no. 1 (2018): 277-291. e31, available at <https://www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674%2818%2931121-8> (last visited January 10, 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

See The Exposome in National Research Council, “Toward Precision Medicine: Building a Knowledge Network for Biomedical Research and a New Taxonomy of Disease” (2011): at 44, available at <https://www.nap.edu/catalog/13284/toward-precision-medicine-building-a-knowledge-network-for-biomedical-research> (last visited January 10, 2019).+(last+visited+January+10,+2019).>Google Scholar

Federal Trade Commission, The Equifax Data: What to Do (September 8, 2017), FTC Consumer Information Website, available at <https://www.consumer.ftc.gov/blog/2017/09/equifax-data-breach-what-do> (last visited January 10, 2019); S. Morse, “CMS Responds to Data Breach Affecting 75,000 in Federal ACA Portal, HEALTHCARE FINANCE (October 22, 2018), available at <https://www.healthcarefinancenews.com/news/cms-responds-data-breach-affecting-75000-federal-aca-portal> (last visited January 10, 2019).+(last+visited+January+10,+2019);+S.+Morse,+“CMS+Responds+to+Data+Breach+Affecting+75,000+in+Federal+ACA+Portal,+HEALTHCARE+FINANCE+(October+22,+2018),+available+at++(last+visited+January+10,+2019).>Google Scholar

Vaas, L., “Hacker-besieged DNA data tucked away under military care,” Naked Security, December 7, 2018, available at <https://nakedsecurity.sophos.com/2018/12/07/hacker-besieged-dna-data-tucked-away-under-military-care/> (last visited March 13, 2019).+(last+visited+March+13,+2019).>Google Scholar

Dyke, S.O.M., Kirby, E., Shabani, M., Thorogood, A., Kato, K., and Knoppers, B.M., “Registered Access: a ‘Triple-A'' Approach,” European Journal of Human Genetics 24, no. 12 (2016): 1676–1680, available at <https://www.nature.com/articles/ejhg2016115> (last visited January 10, 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

There is lively discussion in the literature about non-traditional, digital contracts, including Kar, R.B. and Radin, M.J., “Pseudo-Contract & Shared Meaning Analysis,” Harvard Law Review 132 (forthcoming 2019), available at <https://ssrn.com/abstract=3124018> (last visited January 10, 2019).+(last+visited+January+10,+2019).>Google Scholar

Majumder, M.A., Bollinger, J.M., Villanueva, A.G., Deverka, P.A., and Koenig, B.A., “The Role of Participants in a Medical Information Commons,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 47, no. 1 (2019): 51-61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Budin-Ljøsne, I., Teare, H.J.A., Kaye, J., and Beck, S. et al., “Dynamic Consent: A Potential Solution To Some of The Challenges of Modern Biomedical Research,” BMC Medical Ethics 18, no. 4 (2017), available at <https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-016-0162-9> (last visited January 10, 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koenig, B.A., “Have We Asked Too Much of Consent?” Hastings Center Report 44, no. 4 (2014): 33–34, available at <https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/hast.329> (last visited January 10, 2019); S. Garrett, D. Dohan, and B.A. Koenig, “Linking Broad Consent to Biobank Governance: Support from a Deliberative Public Engagement in California,” American Journal of Bioethics 15, no. 9 (2015): 56–57, available at <https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2015.1062177> (last visited January 10, 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knoppers, B.M., “Framework for Responsible Sharing of Genomic and Health-Related Data,” The HUGO Journal 8, no. 3 (2014), available at <https://thehugojournal.spring-eropen.com/articles/10.1186/s11568-014-0003-1> (last visited January 10, 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

For a discussion on a proposed “researcher reputation system,” see Erlich, Y., Williams, J.B., Glazer, D., and Yocum, K. et al., “Redefining Genomic Privacy: Trust and Empowerment,” PLOS Biology 12, no. 11 (2014): e1001983, available at <https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001983> (last visited January 10, 2019).Google Scholar